Topic-open-endedness

References

1. Bickerton, Derek
   1990 Language and species. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Bickerton, Derek
   2009 Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill and Wang.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carstairs-McCarty, Andrew
   1999 The origins of complex language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dachkovsky, Svetlana
   2016 The development of a relative clause marker from a deictic gesture in Israeli Sign Language. Talk presented atAnnual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS), Workshop 7: Sign language agreement revisited: New theoretical and experimental perspectives, Konstanz.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dachkovsky, Svetlana
   2018 Grammaticalization of intonation in Israeli Sign Language: From information structure to relative clause relations. Haifa: University of HaifaPhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Deacon, Terry
   1997 The symbolic species: The coevolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ergin, Rabia
   2017 Central Taurus Sign Language: A unique vantage point into language emergence. Somerville, MA: Tufts UniversityPhD dissertation. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/69f73091abbc97d1d2997408076c5301/1?pq-origsite=gscholarandcbl=18750anddiss=y
   [Google Scholar]
8. Evans, Nicholas
   2003 Bininj gun-wok: A pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Evans, Nicholas & Steven Levinson
   2009 The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences32. 429–492. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
10. Everett, Dan
    2012 Language: The cultural tool. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Frege, Gottlob
    1952 On concept and object. InPeter Geach (trans.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 42–55. Oxford: Blackwell. [Original 1892 Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie16. 192–205].
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gil, David
    2009 How much grammar does it take to sail a boat?InGeoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (Eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 19–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    2003 The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    2005 What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language. Linguistic Review22. 199–225. 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2‑4.199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199 [Google Scholar]
15. Hauser, Marc
    1996 The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hauser, Marc, Noam Chomsky & Tecumseh Fitch
    2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science298. 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
17. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2007 The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hobaiter, Cat & Richard W. Byrne
    2014 The meanings of Chimpanzee gestures. Current Biology24. 1596–1600. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.066
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.066 [Google Scholar]
19. Hockett, Charles F.
    1960 The origin of speech. Scientific American203. 88–111. 10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
20. Holm, John
    1989 Pidgins and Creoles. VolII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jackendoff, Ray
    2011 What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language87(3). 586–624. 10.1353/lan.2011.0063
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0063 [Google Scholar]
22. Kastner, Itamar, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler & Svetlana Dachkovsky
    2014 The emergence of embedded structure: Insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology5. 1–15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00525
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00525 [Google Scholar]
23. Kocab, Annemarie, Ann Senghas & Jesse Snedeker
    2016 Recursion in Nicaraguan Sign Language. InA. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1343–1348. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Available at: https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2016/papers/0239/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
24. Krifka, Manfred
    2008 Functional similarities between bimanual coordination and topic/comment structure. InRegine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (Eds), Variation, selection, development. Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 307–336. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liebal, Katja & Joseph Call
    2012 The origins of non-human primates’ manual gestures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B367(1585). 118–128. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0044
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0044 [Google Scholar]
26. Meir, Irit
    2010 Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical use of iconic forms. Language84(4). 865–896. 10.1353/lan.2010.0044
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0044 [Google Scholar]
27. Meir, Irit & Ariel Cohen
    2018 Metaphor in sign languages. Frontiers in Psychology9. 1025. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01025
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01025 [Google Scholar]
28. Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Emerging sign languages. InMarc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, Vol.2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Yifat Ziv Ben-Zeev, Sara Lanesman & Meyad Sarsour
    2016 How does a lexicon emerge in a new language? Insights from village sign languages of Israel. Iyunim be Safa ve-Hevra8(1–2). 11–43 (in Hebrew).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistic Society10. 493–509. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.1937
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.1937 [Google Scholar]
31. Pika, Simone & John C. Mitani
    2009 The directed scratch: Evidence for a referential gesture in chimpanzees?InRudolf Botha & Chris Knight (Eds.), The prehistory of language, 166–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545872.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
32. Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff
    2005 The faculty of language: What’s special about it?Cognition95. 201–236. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 [Google Scholar]
33. Pollick, Amy S. & Frans B. M. de Waal
    2007 Ape gesture and language evolution. The National Academy of Sciences104. 8184–8189. 10.1073/pnas.0702624104
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702624104 [Google Scholar]
34. Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2011 The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua121. 2014–2033. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007 [Google Scholar]
35. Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2005 The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. The National Academy of Sciences102(7). 2661–2665. 10.1073/pnas.0405448102
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102 [Google Scholar]
36. Sandler, Wendy
    2009 Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language. Semiotica174(1/4). 241–275.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sandler, Wendy
    2010 Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society108(3). 298–328. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01242.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01242.x [Google Scholar]
38. Sandler, Wendy
    2012 Dedicated gestures in the emergence of sign language. Gesture12(3). 265–307. 10.1075/gest.12.3.01san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.01san [Google Scholar]
39. Taub, Sarah
    2001 Language from the body. Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]