1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Gesture in multiparty interaction by Emily Shaw

 
978-1-944838-43-0978-1-944838-44-7USD 80.00 / € 75.00

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00052.lep
2020-10-30
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Delaporte, Yves & Emily Shaw
    2009 Gesture and signs through history. Gesture9(1). 35–60. doi:  10.1075/gest.9.1.02sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.1.02sha [Google Scholar]
  2. Enfield, Nicholas J.
    2009The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuks, Orit
    2014 Gradient and categorically: Handshape’s two semiotic dimensions in Israeli Sign Language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics60. 207–225. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  4. Green, E. Mara
    2018 Performing gesture: The pragmatic functions of pantomimic and lexical repertoires in a natural sign narrative. Gesture16(2). 329–363. doi:  10.1075/gest.16.2.07gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.07gre [Google Scholar]
  5. Kendon, Adam
    2014 Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language.”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences369(1651). 20130293. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kok, Kasper I. & Alan Cienki
    2016 Cognitive Grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics27(1). 67–100. doi:  10.1515/cog‑2015‑0087
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0087 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kusters, Annelies & Sujit Sahasrabudhe
    2018 Language ideologies on the difference between gesture and sign. Language & Communication60. 44–63. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lepic, Ryan & Corrine Occhino
    2018 A Construction Morphology approach to sign language analysis. InGeert Booij (Ed.), The construction of words, 141–172. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑74394‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  9. Moriarty Harrelson, Erin
    2019 Deaf people with “no language”: Mobility and flexible accumulation in languaging practices of deaf people in Cambodia. Applied Linguistics Review10(1). 55–72. doi:  10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0081 [Google Scholar]
  10. Müller, Cornelia
    2018 Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology9 1651 doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  11. Occhino, Corrine, Benjamin Anible, Erin Wilkinson & Jill P. Morford
    2017 Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder: How language experience affects perceived iconicity. Gesture16(1). 99–125. doi:  10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ [Google Scholar]
  12. Shaw, Emily & Yves Delaporte
    2010 New perspectives on the history of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies11(2). 158–204. doi:  10.1353/sls.2010.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2010.0006 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2015A historical and etymological dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino
    2016 Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics27(3). 371–404. doi:  10.1515/cog‑2016‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00052.lep
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error