Review of Kimmelman (2019): Information structure in sign languages: Evidence from Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of Netherlands

References

1. Büring, Daniel
   2016 (Contrastive) topic. InCaroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
   2013 The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics49(3). 515–565. 10.1017/S0022226713000054
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000054 [Google Scholar]
3. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
   1976 Subject and topic: a new typology of language. InCharles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic, 457–490. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kimmelman, Vadim
   2015 Topics and topic prominence in two sign languages. Journal of Pragmatics87. 156–170. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.004 [Google Scholar]
5. Kimmelman, Vadim & Lianne Vink
   2017 Question-answer pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language Studies17(4). 417–449. 10.1353/sls.2017.0013
   https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2017.0013 [Google Scholar]
6. Reinhart, Tanja
   1982 Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica27(1). 53–94.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Skopeteas, Stavros, Ines Fiedler, Sam Hellmuth, Anne Schwarz, Rubin Stoel, Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka
   2006 Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS): Reference Manual. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Surányi, Balász
   2016 Discourse-configurationality. InCaroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on information structure, 422–440. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sze, Felix
   2008 Topic constructions in Hong Kong Sign Language. Bristol: University of BristolPhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]