1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Subordination in French Sign Language (LSF), Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00054.hau-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00054.hau
2020-12-15
2021-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aristodemo, Valentina & Carlo Geraci
    2018 Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory36. 685–699. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9389‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Caponigro, Ivano & Kathryn Davidson
    2011 Ask, and tell as well: question-answer clauses in American Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics19(4). 323–371. 10.1007/s11050‑011‑9071‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9071-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Comrie, Bernard
    1989Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson, Kathryn, Ivano Caponigro & Rachel Mayberry
    2008 Clausal question-answer pairs: evidence from ASL. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics27. 108–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Den Dikken, Marcel
    2001 Specificational copular sentences and pseudoclefts: a case study. InMartin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 292–409. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder
    2000 Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica54(1). 41–89. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00050
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00050 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimmelman, Vadim & Lianne Vink
    2017 Question-answer pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language Studies17(4). 417–449. 10.1353/sls.2017.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2017.0013 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lehmann, Christian
    1986 On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics24. 663–680. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663 [Google Scholar]
  9. Noonan, Michael
    1985 Complementation. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pozniak, Céline
    2018Le traitement des relatives dans les langues: une approche comparative et multifactorielle. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris CitéPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    2017SignGram Blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511806
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
  12. Schlenker, Philippe
    2003 Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21(1). 157–214. 10.1023/A:1021843427276
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021843427276 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yun, Jiwon, Zhong Chen, Tim Hunter, John Whitman & John Hale
    2015 Uncertainty in processing relative clauses across East Asian languages. Journal of East Asian Linguistics24(2). 113–148. 10.1007/s10831‑014‑9126‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-014-9126-6 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00054.hau
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00054.hau
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error