Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews Sign language phonology

97811071134739781108761925€ 100.00USD 125.00€ 70.00USD 110.00


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Börstell, Carl, Onno Crasborn & Lori Whynot
    2020 Measuring lexical similarity across sign languages in Global Signbank. InProceedings of the LREC2020 9th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 21–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brentari, Diane
    1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019Sign language phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316286401
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286401 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookes, Heather & Victoria Nyst
    2014 Gestures in the Sub-Saharan region. InCornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1154–1161. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L.
    1994 A view of phonology from a cognitive and functional perspective. Cognitive Linguistics5(4). 285–305. 10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.285
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1994.5.4.285 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ann, Jean
    1993An investigation of the relation between physiology and handshape. Tucson, AZ: University of ArizonaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Caselli, Naomi K., Zed Sevcikova Sehyr, Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg & Karen Emmorey
    2016 ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods49. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Demey, Eline & Els van der Kooij
    2008 Phonological patterns in a dependency model: Allophonic relations grounded in phonetic and iconic motivation. Lingua118(8). 1109–1138. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fernald, Theodore B. & Donna Jo Napoli
    2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics3(1). 3–58. 10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman, Lynn
    1976Phonology of a soundless language: Phonological structure of the American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California at BerkeleyPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frishberg, Nancy & Bonnie Gough
    2000 Morphology in American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics3(1). 101–135. 10.1075/sll.3.1.07fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.1.07fri [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari
    2017 Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences40. 1–60. 10.1017/S0140525X15001247
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247 [Google Scholar]
  13. Green, E. Mara
    2014The nature of signs: Nepal’s deaf society, local sign, and the production of communicative sociality. Berkeley, CA: University of California BerkeleyPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    2010Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haviland, John
    2013 (Mis)understanding and obtuseness: “Ethnolinguistic borders” in a miniscule speech community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology23(3). 160–191. 10.1111/jola.12025
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12025 [Google Scholar]
  16. Horton, Laura
    2018Conventionalization of shared homesign systems in Guatemala: Social, lexical, and morphophonological dimensions. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hou, Lynn Yong-Shi
    2016“Making hands”: Family sign languages in the San Juan Quiahije community. Austin, TX: University of Texas at AustinPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kooij, Els van der
    2002Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden UniversityPhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kusters, Annelies
    2017 Gesture-based customer interactions: Deaf and hearing Mumbaikars’ multimodal and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Multilingualism14(3). 283–302. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindblom, Björn, Peter MacNeilage & Michael Studdert-Kennedy
    1983 Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals. Linguistics21(1). 181–204. 10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.181
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.181 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maddieson, Ian
    2011 Phonological complexity in linguistic patterning. InProceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 28–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Morgan, Hope E.
    2017The phonology of Kenyan Sign Language (southwestern dialect). San Diego, CA: University of California San DiegoPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Müller, Cornelia
    2018 Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology9. 1–20. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nettle, Daniel
    1998 Coevolution of phonology and the lexicon in twelve languages of West Africa. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics5(3). 240–245. 10.1080/09296179808590132
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179808590132 [Google Scholar]
  25. Neveu, Grace
    2019Lexical conventionalization and the emergence of grammatical devices in a second generation homesign system in Peru. Austin, TX: University of Texas at AustinPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nyst, Victoria
    2010 Sign languages in West Africa. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 405–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.019 [Google Scholar]
  27. Occhino, Corrine
    2017 An introduction to embodied cognitive phonology: Claw-5 handshape distribution in ASL and Libras. Complutense Journal of English Studies25. 60–103. 10.5209/CJES.57198
    https://doi.org/10.5209/CJES.57198 [Google Scholar]
  28. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    2017SignGram Blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [Open access atwww.degruyter.com/view/title/517764]. 10.1515/9781501511806
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
  29. Reed, Lauren W.
    2019Sign languages of Western Highlands, Papua New Guinea, and their challenges for sign language typology. Canberra, Australia: The Australian National UniversityMasters thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmaling, Constanze
    2000Maganar Hannu: Language of the hands. A descriptive analysis of Hausa Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schuit, Joke
    2013Signs of the Arctic: Typological aspects of Inuit Sign Language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universiteit van AmsterdamPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Trubetzkoy, Nikolaus
    1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson
    2013 High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition128(2). 179–186. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wilson, Margaret
    2002 Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9(4). 625–636. 10.3758/BF03196322
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322 [Google Scholar]
  35. Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie de Vos
    (eds.) 2012Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511496
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error