1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Iconicity as a mediator between verb semantics and morphosyntactic structure, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00058.oom-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00058.oom
2020-12-08
2021-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davidson, Kathryn
    2015 Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics & Philosophy38. 477–520. doi:  10.1007/s10988‑015‑9180‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9180-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. De Beuzeville, Louise , Trevor Johnston & Adam Schembri
    2009 The use of space with indicating verbs in Auslan: A corpus based investigation. Sign Language & Linguistics21(1). 3–39. doi:  10.1075/sll.12.1.03deb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.12.1.03deb [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenlon, Jordan , Adam Schembri & Kearsy Cormier
    2018 Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study. Language94(1). 84–118. doi:  10.1353/lan.2018.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56(2). 251–299. doi:  10.2307/413757
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413757 [Google Scholar]
  5. Malchukov, Andrej
    2005 Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, 73–117. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044651‑6/50006‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50006-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Matushansky, Ora
    2013 Gender confusion. In Lisa L.-S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, 271–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  7. Meir, Irit
    2002 A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory20(2). 413–450. doi:  10.1023/A:1015041113514
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015041113514 [Google Scholar]
  8. Meir, Irit , Carol Padden , Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics43(3). 531–563. doi:  10.1017/S0022226707004768
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
  9. Oomen, Marloes
    2017 Iconicity in argument structure: Psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics20(1). 55–108. doi:  10.1075/sll.20.1.03oom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.03oom [Google Scholar]
  10. Oomen, Marloes & Vadim Kimmelman
    2019 Body-anchored verbs and argument omission in two sign languages. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics4(1). 42. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.741
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.741 [Google Scholar]
  11. Padden, Carol
    1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1981 Split case-marking in verb types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics19(5/6). 389–438. doi:  10.1515/ling.1981.19.5‑6.389
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1981.19.5-6.389 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00058.oom
Loading
  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error