Development of spatial language and memory: Effects of language modality and late sign language exposure

References

1. Clark, Eve V.
   2004 How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences8(10). 472–478. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.012
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.012 [Google Scholar]
2. İlkbaşaran, Deniz
   2015 Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
   2022 Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults. Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. 10.3758/s13421‑022‑01281‑7
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7 [Google Scholar]
4. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Özyürek, A.
   Under review. Sign advantage for children: Signing children’s spatial expressions are more informative than speaking children’s speech and gestures combined.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
   2021 Effects and non-effects of late language exposure on spatial language development: Evidence from deaf adults and children. Language Learning and Development17, 1–25. 10.1080/15475441.2020.1823846
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1823846 [Google Scholar]
6. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
   2017 Effects of delayed language exposure on spatial language acquisition by signing children and adults. InGlenn Gunzelmann, Andrew Howes, Thora Tenbrink & Eddy Davelaar (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the cognitive science society (CogSci 2017), 2372–2376. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
   2021 Spatial language use predicts spatial memory of children: Evidence from sign, speech, and speech-plus-gesture. InTecumseh Fitch, Claus Lamm, Helmut Leder & Kristin Tessmar (eds.), Proceedings of the 43th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021), 672–678. Vienna: Cognitive Science Society.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lillo-Martin, Diane & John Henner
   2021 Acquisition of sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics7. 395–419. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑043020‑092357
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-043020-092357 [Google Scholar]
9. Mayberry, Rachel I.
   1998 The critical period for language acquisition and the deaf child’s language comprehension: A psycholinguistic approach. Bulletin de Audiophonologie14. 349–360.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mitchell, Rose E. & Michael A. Karchmer
    2004 Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies4(2). 138–163. 10.1353/sls.2004.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005 [Google Scholar]
11. Özyürek, Aslı
    2018 Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances. InMaya Hickmann, Edy Veneziano & Harriet Jisa (eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners, 123–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.22.07ozy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.07ozy [Google Scholar]
12. Perniss, Pamela M., Inge Zwitserlood & Aslı Özyürek
    2015 Does space structure spatial language? A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language91(3). 611–641. 10.1353/lan.2015.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0041 [Google Scholar]
13. Sümer, Beyza
    2015 Acquisition of spatial language by signing and speaking children: A comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sümer, Beyza & Aslı Özyürek
    2020 No effects of modality in development of locative expressions of space in signing and speaking children. Journal of Child Language47(6). 1101–1131. 10.1017/S0305000919000928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000928 [Google Scholar]