1887
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00075.koe
2023-07-03
2024-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acquaviva, Paolo
    2009 Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. InAlexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds.), York-Essex Morphology Meeting51, 1–21. York: University of York, Department of Language and Linguistic Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordachioaia & Elena Soare
    2010 Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: a Distributed Morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics46(3). 537–574. 10.1017/S0022226710000058
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000058 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bale, Alan & David Barner
    2009 The interpretation of functional heads: using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics261. 217–252. 10.1093/jos/ffp003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp003 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2012 Semantic triggers, linguistic variation and the mass-count distinction. InDiane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 238–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bale, Alan & Hrayr Khanjian
    2008 Classifiers and number marking. Semantics and Linguistic Theory181. 73–89. 10.3765/salt.v18i0.2478
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v18i0.2478 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borer, Hagit
    2005Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma
    1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry301. 509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chierchia, Gennaro
    1998a Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics61. 339–405. 10.1023/A:1008324218506
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1998b Plurality and mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. InSusan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010 Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese1741. 99–149. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2021 Mass vs. count: where do we stand? Outline of a theory of semantic variation. InTibor Kiss, Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Halima Husić (eds.), Things and stuff: the semantics of the count-mass distinction, 21–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108937979.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937979.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deal, Amy Rose
    2017 Countability distinction and semantic variation. Natural Language Semantics251. 125–176. 10.1007/s11050‑017‑9132‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9132-0 [Google Scholar]
  13. Doetjes, Jenny
    1997Quantifiers and selection: on the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Leiden: Leiden University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Embick, David
    2021 The motivation for roots in Distributed Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics71. 69–88. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑040620‑061341
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-040620-061341 [Google Scholar]
  15. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
    2012 Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. InGillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Franzon, Francesca, Giorgio Arcara & Chiara Zanini
    2021 The role of context and cognition in countability: a psycholinguistic account of lexical distributions. InTibor Kiss, Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Halima Husić (eds.), Things and stuff: the semantics of the count-mass distinction, 321–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108937979.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937979.015 [Google Scholar]
  17. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building201, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackendoff, Ray
    1991 Parts and boundaries. Cognition411. 9–45. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90031‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X [Google Scholar]
  19. Kelly, Justin Robert
    2013The syntax-semantics interface in distributed morphology. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Koulidobrova, Helen
    2021 Counting (on) bare nouns: revelations from American Sign Language. InTibor Kiss, Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Halima Husić (eds.), Things and stuff: the semantics of the count-mass distinction, 213–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108937979.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937979.010 [Google Scholar]
  21. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics4(2). 201–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nomoto, Hiroki
    2013Number in classifier languages. University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2006 Pluralization in sign and in speech: a cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology10(2). 135–182. 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.006 [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothstein, Susan
    2010 Counting and the mass-count distinction. Journal of Semantics27(3). 343–397. 10.1093/jos/ffq007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007 [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsoulas, George
    2009 On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. InClaire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman & David Foster Hill (eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT, 333–348. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Boven, Cindy
    2020 Fill the gap: a novel test to elicit nominal plurals in Sign Language of the Netherlands. FEAST31. 56–67. 10.31009/FEAST.i3.05
    https://doi.org/10.31009/FEAST.i3.05 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00075.koe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00075.koe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error