The role of iconicity and simultaneity in efficient communication in the visual modality

References

1. Gibson, Edward, Richard Futrell, Steven P. Piantadosi, Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Leon Bergen & Roger Levy
   2019 How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences23(5). 389–407. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003 [Google Scholar]
2. Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Wing C. So, Aslı Özyürek & Carolyn Mylander
   2008 The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105(27). 9163–9168. 10.1073/pnas.0710060105
   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710060105 [Google Scholar]
3. Grice, Herbert Paul
   1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
4. Levshina, Natalia
   2022 Communicative efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108887809
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887809 [Google Scholar]
5. Levshina, Natalia & Steven Moran
   2021 Efficiency in human languages: Corpus evidence for universal principles. Linguistics Vanguard7(s3). 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0081
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0081 [Google Scholar]
6. Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
   2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology11. 227. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
7. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
   2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
8. Slonimska, Anita, Aslı Özyürek & Olga Capirci
   2020 The role of iconicity and simultaneity for efficient communication: The case of Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognition2001. 104246. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246 [Google Scholar]
9. Slonimska, Anita, Aslı Özyürek & Olga Capirci
   2021 Using depiction for efficient communication in LIS (Italian Sign Language). Language and Cognition13(3). 367–396. 10.1017/langcog.2021.7
   https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.7 [Google Scholar]
10. Slonimska, Anita, Aslı Özyürek & Olga Capirci
    2022 Simultaneity as an emergent property of efficient communication in language: A comparison of silent gesture and sign language. Cognitive Science46(5). e13133. 10.1111/cogs.13133
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13133 [Google Scholar]
11. Temperley, David & Daniel Gildea
    2018 Minimizing syntactic dependency lengths: Typological/cognitive universal?Annual Review of Linguistics41. 67–80. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011817‑045617
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045617 [Google Scholar]
12. Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn
    (eds.) 2007 Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.281
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.281 [Google Scholar]