1887
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates how British Sign Language (BSL) learners develop positional and dimensional aspects of topographic space. The teaching of BSL has been occurring at an increasing rate, and many people are learning to use BSL to the advanced levels, which are generally referred to in the UK as BSL Levels 4 and 6 and are loosely equivalent to pre-C1 (advanced) and C1 (proficient), respectively, on the Common European Framework for Reference (Languages) scale. Spatial grammar is a crucial aspect of BSL (Brennan 1992), and this article provides insight into issues related to learning how to use topographic space, a feature of spatial grammar whereby real-world referent locations are replicated in the signing production. This study of L2 advanced learners of BSL explores the numbers and types of errors that are made when applying topographic features into their signing, with a particular focus on positioning and dimensionality aspects. Two scenarios are used do this: classroom layouts (Task 1) and a courtroom layout (Task 2). The study concludes with reflections on how BSL teachers can support L2 learners in improving their development of topographic skills.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00086.nun
2024-07-23
2025-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. Charles, Caroline Clapham & David Steel
    1997 Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research1(2). 93–121. 10.1177/136216889700100202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100202 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allbutt, John & Jonathan Ling
    2016 Adult college learners of British Sign Language: Educational provision and learner self-report variables associated with exam success. Sign Language Studies16(3). 330–360. 10.1353/sls.2016.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2016.0006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boers-Visker, Eveline
    2020Learning to use space: A study into the L2-acquisition process of adult learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertations. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brennan, Mary
    1992 The visual world of British Sign Language. InDavid Brien (ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brien, David
    1992 (ed.) Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brookfield, Stephen
    2017Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cormier, Kearsy, Jordon Fenlon & Adam Schembri
    2016 Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Paper presented at the12th Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, 4–7 January 2016, Melbourne, Australia.
  8. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Martine Zwets
    2013 Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics551. 119–139. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Day, Elaine M. & Stan M. Shapson
    1991 Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: an experimental study. Language Learning411. 21–58. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1991.tb00675.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00675.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Dörnyei, Zoltan & Ema Ushioda
    2001Teaching and researching motivation. Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dye, Matthew W. G. & Robin L. Thompson
    2020 Perception and production of language in the visual modality. InGary Morgan (ed.), Understanding deafness, language and cognitive development: Essays in honour of Bencie Woll, 133–157. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.25.08dye
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.25.08dye [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, Rod
    2002 The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. InEli Hinkel & Sandra Fotos (eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms, 14–34. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Emmorey, Karen, David Corina & Ursula Bellugi
    1995 Different processing of topographic and referential functions of space. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture and space. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fenlon, Jordan, Kearsy Cormier & Diane Brentari
    2018 The phonology of sign languages. InStephen J. Hannahs & Anna R. K. Bosch (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, 453–475. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferrara, Lindsay & Anna-Lena Nilsson
    2017 Describing spatial layouts as an L2M2 signed language learner. Sign Language & Linguistics20(1). 1–26. 10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer [Google Scholar]
  16. Frederiksen, Anne T. & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2019 Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited overexplicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions. Second Language Research35(2). 253–283. 10.1177/0267658317750220
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317750220 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldberg, Emily B.
    2015Assessing the American Sign Language version of the computerized revised token test. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Bachelor of Philosophy thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harley, Birgit
    1989 Functional Grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics101. 331–359. 10.1093/applin/10.3.331
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.3.331 [Google Scholar]
  19. Janzen, Terry
    2004 Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics15(2). 149–174. 10.1515/cogl.2004.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol.11). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Larsen-Freeman, Diane
    2008Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Llobera, Marcos
    1996 Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity701. 612–622. 10.1017/S0003598X00083745
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00083745 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lyster, Roy
    1994 The role of functional-analytical language teaching on aspects of French immersion learners’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics151. 263–287. 10.1093/applin/15.3.263
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.3.263 [Google Scholar]
  24. Marsaja, I. Gede
    2008Desa Kolok: A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mather, Susan M.
    1996 Initiation in visually constructed dialogue: Reading books with three-to eight-year-old students who are deaf and hard of hearing. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities – volume II: Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 109–131. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mertens, Donna M.
    2015Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mukalel, Joseph C.
    2005Approaches to English language teaching. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Murunoi, Hitoshi
    2001 Focus on from through interaction enhancement. Language Learning501. 617–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nunn, Nicola J.
    2018UNITED OR DIVIDED? A sociocultural study of conflict among British Sign Language users in the workplace. Preston: University of Central Lancashire PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Napier, Jemina & Lorraine Leeson
    2016Sign Language in action. Research and practice in applied linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Norris, John & Lourdes Ortega
    2001 Effectiveness of L2/Ln instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning501. 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  32. OpenStax College
    OpenStax College 2013 Anatomy & physiology. Available at: cnx.org/content/col11496/1.6/
  33. Özyürek, Aslı & Bencie Woll
    2019 Language in the visual modality: Co-speech gesture and sign language. InPeter Hagoort (ed.), Human language: From genes and brain to behavior, 67–83. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Padden, A Carol
    2015 Methods of research on sign language grammars. InEleni Orfanidou, Bencie Woll & Gary Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 141–155. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118346013.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346013.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Perniss, Pamela
    2012 Use of sign space. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 412–431. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.412
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.412 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pica, Teresa, Richard Young & Catherine Doughty
    1987 The impact of the interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly211. 735–758. 10.2307/3586992
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586992 [Google Scholar]
  37. Quinto-Pozos, David
    2011 Teaching American Sign Language to hearing adult learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics311. 137–158. 10.1017/S0267190511000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000195 [Google Scholar]
  38. Richards, Jack C. & David Nunan
    1990 (eds.) Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richards, Jack C., & Charles Lockhart
    1996Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rogers, Katherine D., Alys Young, Karina Lovell, Malcolm Campbell, Paul R. Scott, Sarah Kendal
    2013 The British Sign Language versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education18(1). 110–122. 10.1093/deafed/ens040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens040 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rogers, Katherine, Chris Evans, Malcolm Campbell, Alys Young & Karina Lovell
    2014 The reliability of British Sign Language and English versions of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure with d/Deaf populations in the UK: an initial study. Health and Social Care in the Community22(3). 278–289. 10.1111/hsc.12078
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12078 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosen, Russell S.
    2010 America Sign Language curricula: A review. Sign Language Studies10(3). 348–381. 10.1353/sls.0.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0050 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2019 Teaching L2/Ln sign language grammar. InRussell S. Rosen (ed.), The Routledge handbook of sign language pedagogy, 218–232. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315406824‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315406824-16 [Google Scholar]
  44. Savas, Perihan
    2012 Use of digital video recording in the preparation stage of pre-service foreign language teachers’ micro-teachings. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications3(3). 107–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sauvignon, Sandra J.
    1997Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Ready, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sheldon, Signy, Can Fenerci & Lauri Gurguryan
    2019 A neurocognitive perspective on the forms and functions of autobiographical memory retrieval. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience13(4). 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00004
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Skinner, B. F.
    1957Verbal Behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 10.1037/11256‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000 [Google Scholar]
  48. So, Wing Chee, Marie Coppola, Vincent Licciardello & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2005 The seeds of spatial grammar in the manual modality. Cognitive Science29(6). 1029–1043. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_38
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_38 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stokoe, William C.
    1960 Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers8. Buffalo: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education10(1), 3–37]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stokoe, William. C., Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Croneberg
    1965A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language, an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  52. Traxler, Rachel E. & Kimi Nakatsukasa
    2018 The effectiveness of voice-on and voice-off instruction on ASL vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research241. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tyrone, Martha E.
    2015 Instrumented measures of sign production and perception: Motion capture, movement analysis, eye-tracking, and reaction times. InEleni Orfanidou, Bencie Woll & Gary Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 89–104. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118346013.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346013.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Watson, John B.
    1930Behaviorism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilcox, Phyllis P.
    2000Metaphors in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis P. Wilcox
    1998Learning to see: Teaching American Sign Language as a second language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Williams, Marion & Robert L. Burden
    2004Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00086.nun
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00086.nun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error