1887
image of Morphological reduplication in Sign Language of the Netherlands
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this online first article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00093.van
2025-01-23
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boersma, Paul
    1997 How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes
    2001 Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/002438901554586
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554586 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2020Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 6.1.27. URL: www.praat.org/. Accessed14 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Börstell, Carl
    . To appear. Iconic plurality across modalities. InOlga Fischer, Kimi Akita & Pamela Perniss eds. The Oxford handbook of iconicity in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood
    2008 The Corpus NGT: An online corpus for professionals and laymen. InOnno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.), Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora: 3rd workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages, –. Paris: ELDA.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crasborn, Onno, Inge Zwitserlood & Johan Ros
    2008The Corpus NGT: A digital open access corpus of movies and annotations of Sign Language of the Netherlands. URL: hdl.handle.net/hdl:1839/00-0000-0000-0004-DF8E-6. Accessed26 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
    2013 Perfective/imperfective aspect. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. URL: wals.info/chapter/65. Accessed16 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Downing, Laura J. & Sharon Inkelas
    2015 What is reduplication? Typology and analysis part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass(). –. 10.1111/lnc3.12152
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12152 [Google Scholar]
  10. Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels
    2012 Iconicity. InJochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ergin, Rabia, Ann Senghas, Ray Jackendoff & Lila Gleitman
    2020 Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.00048.erg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00048.erg [Google Scholar]
  12. Everaert, Martin
    2000 Types of anaphoric expressions: Reflexives and reciprocals. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.41.04eve
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.04eve [Google Scholar]
  13. Harder, Rita, Corline Koolhof & Trude Schermer
    2003Meervoud in de NGT: Verslag van een onderzoek in het kader van OCW subsidie [Plurality in NGT: Report of a study in the context of OCW subsidy 2003]. URL: https://www.gebarencentrum.nl/publicaties. Accessed7 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harley, Heidi & Maria Florez Leyva
    2009 Form and meaning in Hiaki (Yaqui) verbal reduplication. International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/596595
    https://doi.org/10.1086/596595 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hayes, Bruce & May Abad
    1989 Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua. –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(89)90044‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(89)90044-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin
    2001 Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, –. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2018 Reduplication and repetition in Russian Sign Language. InRita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110592498‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110592498-004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Klomp, Ulrika
    2021A descriptive grammar of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité
    2015 Arbitrariness and iconicity in total reduplication: Evidence from Caribbean Creoles. InDaniela Rossi (ed.), The why and how of total reduplication: Current issues and new perspectives, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sl.39.4.03kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.03kou [Google Scholar]
  21. Nyst, Victoria, Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa van der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller
    2021 Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: Towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2021‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-0026 [Google Scholar]
  22. Oomen, Marloes
    2016 The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau
    2017 Signing not (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Palfreyman, Nick
    2019Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and sociolinguistic analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501504822
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504822 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2003 Optimal reciprocals in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.6.1.03pfa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.6.1.03pfa [Google Scholar]
  26. 2005 Plural formation in German Sign Language: Constraints and strategies. InHelen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte — Sonderheft 15), –. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2016 Modality and meaning: Plurality of relations in German Sign Language. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
    [1993] 2004Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. [Technical report CU-CS-696-93, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, and technical report TR-2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, April 1993.]. 10.1002/9780470759400
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759400 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rathmann, Christian G.
    2005Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubino, Carl
    2013 Reduplication. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS online, v2020.3 [Data set]. URL: wals.info/chapter/27. Accessed4 October 2023. Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7385533
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 [Google Scholar]
  31. Spaelti, Philip
    1997Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  33. van Boven, Cindy
    2020 Fill the gap: A novel test to elicit nominal plurals in NGT. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory. –. 10.31009/FEAST.i3.05
    https://doi.org/10.31009/FEAST.i3.05 [Google Scholar]
  34. van Boven, Cindy & Marloes Oomen
    2021 Habituals in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A corpus-based study. Linguistics in Amsterdam(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zwitserlood, Inge & Sibylla Nijhof
    1999 Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). InJan Don & Ted Sanders (eds.), OTS yearbook 1998–1999, –. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00093.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00093.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error