1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Preview this article:

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00095.zac
2025-09-09
2026-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/sll.00095.zac.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00095.zac&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andrikopoulou, Εirini
    2015Compounding and compound signs in Greek Sign Language. Patras: University of Patras PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berko, Jean
    1958 The child’s learning of English morphology. Word141. 150–177. 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayes, Bruce & May Abad
    1989 Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua771. 331–374. 10.1016/0024‑3841(89)90044‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(89)90044-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Marcus, Gary F., Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Steven Pinker & Richard Wiese
    1995 German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology291. 189–256. 10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015 [Google Scholar]
  5. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2005 Plural formation in German Sign Language: Constraints and strategies. InHelen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.) Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Special Issue 15), 111–144. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2006 Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology101. 135–182. 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Pizzuto, Elena & Serena Corazza
    1996 Noun morphology in Italian Sign Language. Lingua981. 169–196. 10.1016/0024‑3841(95)00037‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00037-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ralli, Αngeliki
    2005Morphology. Athens: Patakis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. van Boven, Cindy
    2021 Phonological restrictions on nominal pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Evidence from corpus and elicited data. Folia Linguistica55(2). 313–359. 10.1515/flin‑2021‑2039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2021-2039 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilbur, Ronnie
    1987American Sign Language: Linguistic and applied dimensions. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zwitserlood, Inge & Sibylla Nijhof
    1999 Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). InJan Don & Ted Sanders (eds.), ΟTS Yearbook 1998–1999, 58–78. Utrecht: UiL OTS.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00095.zac
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00095.zac
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error