1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Preview this article:

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00096.kul
2025-09-26
2026-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/sll.00096.kul.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00096.kul&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aboh, Enoch O., Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan
    2005 When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. InTanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 2005. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 11–43. 10.1515/9783110186185.11
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186185.11 [Google Scholar]
  2. Branchini, Chiara, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati & Carlo Geraci
    2013 Wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics16(2). 157–188. 10.1075/sll.16.2.03bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.03bra [Google Scholar]
  3. Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
    2009 Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language85(2). 278–320. 10.1353/lan.0.0114
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0114 [Google Scholar]
  4. Kulshreshtha, Neha
    2013Wh-questions in Indo-Pakistani Sign Language. Delhi: University of Delhi M.Phil Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2020 Exploring wh-questions in Indian Sign Language. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory31. 30–42. 10.31009/FEAST.i3.03
    https://doi.org/10.31009/FEAST.i3.03 [Google Scholar]
  6. Neidle, Carol, Judy A. Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin
    1997 Rightward wh-movement in American Sign Language. InDorothee Beermann, David LeBlanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Rightward movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 247–278. 10.1075/la.17.11nei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.17.11nei [Google Scholar]
  7. Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
    1997 WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language73(1). 18–57. 10.2307/416592
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416592 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilbur, Ronnie B.
    2011 Nonmanuals, semantic operators, domain marking, and the solution to two outstanding puzzles in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics14(1). 148–178. 10.1075/sll.14.1.08wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.08wil [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2000Sign language in Indo-Pakistan; a description of a signed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.101
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.101 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2003 Indo-Pakistani Sign Language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies3(2). 157–212. 10.1353/sls.2003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2004 Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language80(1). 7–39. 10.1353/lan.2004.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0050 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00096.kul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00096.kul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error