Complex syntactic constructions in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands

References

1. Aboh, Enoch O.
   2020 Lessons from neuro-(a)-typical brains: universal multilingualism, code-mixing, recombination, and executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00488
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00488 [Google Scholar]
2. Branchini, Chiara
   2014 On relativization and clefting: An analysis of Italian Sign Language. Berlin / Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton / Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501500008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500008 [Google Scholar]
3. Brunelli, Michele
   2011 Antisymmetry and sign languages: A comparison between NGT and LIS. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
4. Burkova, Svetlana
   2015 Russian Sign Language Corpus [Electronic resource]. rsl.nstu.ru/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood
   2008 The Corpus NGT: an online corpus for professionals and laymen. InConstruction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, –. Paris: ELDA.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dachkovsky, Svetlana
   2022 Emergence of a subordinate construction in a sign language: Intonation ploughs the field for morphosyntax. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics(). –. 10.16995/glossa.9074
   https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9074 [Google Scholar]
7. Donati, Caterina & Carlo Cecchetto
   2011 Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures. Linguistic Inquiry. –. 10.1162/LING_a_00060
   https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00060 [Google Scholar]
8. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
   2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science. –. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
9. Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog
   (eds.) 2011 The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Khristoforova, Evgeniia
    2023 Subject agreement in control and modal constructions in Russian Sign Language: Implications for the hierarchy of person features. Sign Language & Linguistics. –. 10.1075/sll.21005.khr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.21005.khr [Google Scholar]
11. Khristoforova, Evgeniia & Vadim Kimmelman
    2020 Relativization in Russian Sign Language: Basic features. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. –. 10.31857/0373‑658X.2020.6.48‑65
    https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2020.6.48-65 [Google Scholar]
12. Klomp, Ulrika
    2021 A descriptive grammar of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
13. Lehmann, Christian
    2004 Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik. –. 10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152 [Google Scholar]
14. Lehmann, Christian
    2008 Information structure and grammaticalization. InElena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.12leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.12leh [Google Scholar]
15. Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann
    2012 Verb agreement. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.136
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.136 [Google Scholar]
16. Ohori, Toshio
    2011 The grammaticalization of subordination. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0052 [Google Scholar]
17. Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Annika Herrmann
    (eds.) 2016 A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501503238
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503238 [Google Scholar]
18. Pfau, Roland
    2011 A point well taken: On the typology and diachrony of pointing. InGaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
20. van Gijn, Ingeborg
    2004 The quest for syntactic dependency. Sentential complementation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
21. Wurmbrand, Susi & Magdalena Lohninger
    2023 An implicational universal in complementation — Theoretical insights and empirical progress. InJutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.). Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues, –. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]