The competition between arguments for prominence in German Sign Language

References

1. Aissen, Judith
   2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. –. 10.1023/A:1024109008573
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573 [Google Scholar]
2. Beavers, John
   2011 On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. –. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9124‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6 [Google Scholar]
3. Bross, Fabian
   2020 Object marking in German Sign Language (Deutsche Gebärdensprache): Differential object marking and object shift in the visual modality. Glossa(). .
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cormier, Kearsy & Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
   2015 Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics. –. 10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor [Google Scholar]
5. ELAN
   ELAN (Version 6.6) [Computer software] 2023 Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Retrieved fromhttps://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
6. Fenlon, Jordan, Adam Schembri & Kearsy Cormier
   2018 Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages, Glossa(). .
   [Google Scholar]
7. von Heusinger, Klaus & Petra Schumacher
   2019 Discourse prominence: Definition and application. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025 [Google Scholar]
8. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Beatrice Primus
   2015 Prominence beyond prosody — a first approximation. InAmadeo de Dominicis (ed.), Prominences in linguistics, –. Viterbo: DISUCOM Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
   2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass. –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
10. Just, Erika
    2024 A structural and functional comparison of differential A and P indexing. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0124
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0124 [Google Scholar]
11. Konrad, Reiner, Thomas Hanke, Gabriele Langer, Dolly Blanck, Julian Bleicken, Ilona Hofmann, Olga Jeziorski, Lutz König, Simone König, Rie Nishio, Anja Regen, Uta Salden, Sven Wagner, Satu Worseck, Oliver Böse, Oliver, Elena Jahn & Marc Schulder
    2020 MY DGS — annotated. Public corpus of German Sign Language.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kretzschmar, Franziska, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Adrian Staub, Dietmar Roehm & Matthias Schlesewsky
    2012 Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic reanalysis. InMonique Lamers & Peter de Swart (eds.), Case, word order, and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1463‑2_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1463-2_11 [Google Scholar]
13. Liddell, Scott K.
    2003 Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
14. Malchukov, Andrej
    2005 Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. InAmber Mengistu & Heleen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages, –. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044651‑6/50006‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50006-9 [Google Scholar]
15. Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226707004768
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
16. Næss, Åshild
    2004 What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.005 [Google Scholar]
17. Padden, Carol
    1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL morphology. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, –. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Rathmann, Christian
    2003 The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from German Sign Language (DGS). Texas Linguistics Forum. –.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Steinbach, Markus
    2022 Differential object marking in sign languages? Restrictions on (object) agreement in German Sign Language. InAndrew Nevins, Anita Peti-Stantic, Mark de Vos & Jana Willer-Gold (eds.), Angles of object agreement, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192897749.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897749.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
20. Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
    2007 Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. InPamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: comparative studies on sign language structure, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198850.303
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198850.303 [Google Scholar]
21. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1985 Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700010318
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010318 [Google Scholar]