f Cognitive and functional explorations in sign language linguistics

References

1. Bybee, Joan
   2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
2. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Martine Zwets
   2013 Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
3. Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
   2018 Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716 [Google Scholar]
4. Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer
   2002 Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. InRichard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010 [Google Scholar]
5. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
   2010 Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et société(). –. 10.3917/ls.131.0019
   https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.131.0019 [Google Scholar]
6. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
   1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lepic, Ryan
   2019 A usage-based alternative to “lexicalization” in sign language linguistics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(). .
   [Google Scholar]
8. Liddell, Scott K.
   2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
9. Lillo-Martin, Diane
   1991 Universal grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3468‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3468-2 [Google Scholar]
10. Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
    2000 The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ortega, Gerardo
    2017 Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: A review. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280 [Google Scholar]
12. Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
13. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2006 Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag. Available atopus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2006/1088/.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
15. Stokoe, William C.
    1960 Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education(), –].
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Croneberg
    1965 A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Taub, Sarah F.
    2001 Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
18. Volterra, Virginia, Maria Roccaforte, Alessio Di Renzo & Sabina Fontana
    2022 Italian Sign Language from a cognitive and socio-semiotic perspective: Implications for a general language theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.9 [Google Scholar]
19. Wilcox, Sherman
    2004 Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cogl.2004.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.005 [Google Scholar]