1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There are two main competing views about the nature of sign language role shift within formal semantics today: Quer (2005) and Schlenker (2017ab), following now standard analyses of indexical shift in spoken languages, analyze it as a so-called ‘monstrous operator’, while Davidson (2015) and Maier (2017), following more traditional and cognitive approaches, analyze it as a form of quotation. Examples of role shift in which some indexicals are shifted and some unshifted pose a prima facie problem for both approaches. In this paper, we propose a pragmatic principle of attraction to regulate the apparent unshifting/unquoting of indexicals in quotational role shift. The analysis is embedded in a systematic empirical investigation of the predictions of the attraction hypothesis for German Sign Language (DGS). Results for the first and second person pronouns ( and ) support the attraction hypothesis, while results for are inconclusive.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.18004.hub
2020-02-10
2020-02-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anand, Pranav
    2006De de se. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37418
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins
    2004 Shifty operators in changing contexts. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)14. 20–37. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2913
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2913 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach
    2011 Exploring the meaning of quotation. InElke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Quotation and meaning, 1–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cappelen, Herman & Ernest Lepore
    1997 Varieties of quotation. Mind106. 429–450. 10.1093/mind/106.423.429
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/106.423.429 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2012 Quotation. InEdward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/quotation/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Herbert & Richard Gerrig
    1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4). 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Martine Zwets
    2013 Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics55. 119–39. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
    2015 Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics18(2). 167–204. 10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidson, Donald
    1979 Quotation. Theory and Decision11(1). 27–40. doi:  10.1007/BF00126690
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126690 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson, Kathryn
    2015 Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy38(6). 477–520. doi:  10.1007/s10988‑015‑9180‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9180-1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deal, Amy Rose
    2017 Shifty asymmetries: Universals and variation in shifty indexicality. Unpublished manuscript, UC Berkeley.
  12. Eckardt, Regine
    2014The semantics of free indirect discourse. How texts allow us to mindread and eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, Nicholas
    2012 Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. InDunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Herrmann, Annika & Nina-Kristin Pendzich
    2018 Between narrator and protagonist in fables of German Sign Language. InAnnika Hübl & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages, 275–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.247.12her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.247.12her [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach
    2012 Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. InIngrid van Alphen & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15.12her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.12her [Google Scholar]
  17. Hübl, Annika
    2014 Context shift (im)possible: Indexicals in German Sign Language. Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics of Europe (ConSOLE)21. 171–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaplan, David
    1989 Demonstratives. InJoseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Liddell, Scott & Melanie Metzger
    1998 Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics30(6). 657–697. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00061‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00061-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lillo-Martin, Diane
    1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2012 Utterance reports and constructed action. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.365 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maier, Emar
    2014 Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity. Semantics & Pragmatics. 7(7). 1–67. doi:  10.3765/sp.7.7
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.7 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2016 A plea against monsters. Grazer Philosophische Studien93. 363–95. 10.1163/18756735‑09303003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-09303003 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017 The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse. InPaul Saka & Michael Johnson (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of quotation, 259–280. Berlin: Springer. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002966. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑68747‑6_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68747-6_9 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018 Quotation, demonstration, and attraction in sign language role shift. Theoretical Linguistics44. 165–176. 10.1515/tl‑2018‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0019 [Google Scholar]
  26. Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics43. 531–563. 10.1017/S0022226707004768
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
  27. Metzger, Melanie
    1995 Constructed dialogue and constructed action in ASL. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 255–271. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. InDiane Brentari (ed.) Sign languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
  29. Potts, Christopher
    2007 The dimensions of quotation. InChris Barker & Pauline Jacobson (eds.), Direct compositionality, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller
    1995 On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Onea, Edgar & Alexander Syring
    2012 OnExp. Courant Research Center ‘Text Structures’ (University of Göttingen). https://onexp.textstrukturen.uni-goettingen.de/
  32. Quer, Josep
    2005 Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)15. 152–168. 10.3765/salt.v15i0.2923
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v15i0.2923 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2011 Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. InElke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Quotation and meaning, 277–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2012 Attitude ascriptions in sign languages and role shift. Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Society (TLS)13. 12–28. tls.ling.utexas.edu/2012tls/proceedings/TLS13-02-Quer.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    2017The SignGram blueprint. A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511806
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schlenker, Philippe
    1999 Propositional attitudes and indexicality: A cross-categorial approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9353
  37. 2003 A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy26(1). 29–120. doi:  10.1023/A:1022225203544
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225203544 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011 Indexicality and de se reports. InKlaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 1561–1604. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017a Super monsters I: Attitude and action role shift in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics10(9). 1–65. doi:  10.3765/sp.10.9
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.9 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017b Super monsters II: Role shift, iconicity and quotation in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics10(12). 1–67. doi:  10.3765/sp.10.12
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.12 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro
    2013 Iconic variables. Linguistics & Philosophy36(2). 91–149. 10.1007/s10988‑013‑9129‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9129-1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stec, Kashmiri, Mike Huiskes & Gisela Redeker
    2016 Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics104. 1–17. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  43. Steinbach, Markus & Edgar Onea
    2016 A DRT analysis of discourse referents and anaphora resolution in sign language. Journal of Semantics33. 409–448. doi:  10.1093/jos/ffv002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffv002 [Google Scholar]
  44. Streeck, Jürgen
    2002 Grammars, words, and embodied meanings. On the uses and evolution of so and like. The Journal of Communication52. 581–596. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02563.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02563.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Tannen, Deborah
    1989Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Zucchi, Sandro
    2004 Monsters in the visual mode?Unpublished manuscript, University of Milan. filosofia.dipafilo.unimi.it/~zucchi/NuoviFile/LISmonsters.pdf
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.18004.hub
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.18004.hub
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attraction , demonstration , indexicals , quotation , role shift and shift together
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error