Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aristodemo, Valentina & Carlo Geraci
    2015 Comparatives and visible degree scales in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Paper presented at Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory (FEAST) , Barcelona, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balusu, Rahul
    2005 Distributive reduplication in Telugu. In Christopher Davis , Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 36), 39–53, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts GLSA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker, Chris
    2007 Parasitic scope. Linguistics and Philosophy30(4). 407–444. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑007‑9021‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9021-y [Google Scholar]
  4. Brasoveanu, Adrian
    2013 Modified numerals as post-suppositions. Journal of Semantics30(2). 155–209. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffs003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brasoveanu, Adrian & Donka Farkas
    2011 How indefinites choose their scope. Linguistics and Philosophy34(1). 1–55. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑011‑9092‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9092-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cable, Seth
    2014 Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in Tlingit (and beyond). Language90(3). 562–606. doi: 10.1353/lan.2014.0093
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0093 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cusic, David D
    1981Verbal plurality and aspect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Emmorey, Karen & Melissa Herzig
    2003 Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages, 221–246. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Henderson, Robert
    2014 Dependent indefinites and their post-suppositions. Semantics and Pragmatics7(6). 1–58. doi: 10.3765/sp.7.6
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kennedy, Christopher & Beth Levin
    2008 Variable telicity in degree achievements. In Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Malaia, Evie & Ronnie B. Wilbur
    2012 Telicity expression in the visual modality. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 122–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nouwen, Rick
    2003Plural pronominal anaphora in context: Dynamic aspects of quantification. Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schlenker, Philippe
    2014 Iconic features. Natural Language Semantics22(4). 299–356. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑014‑9106‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-014-9106-4 [Google Scholar]
  14. van den Berg, Martin
    1996Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse: The dynamics of nominal anaphora. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilbur, Ronnie B
    2003 Representations of telicity in ASL. Chicago Linguistic Society39. 354–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Other
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error