1887
image of Use and acquisition of mouth actions in L2 sign language learners

Abstract

Abstract

This article deals with L2 acquisition of a sign language, examining in particular the use and acquisition of non-manual mouth actions performed by L2 learners of Swedish Sign Language. Based on longitudinal data from an L2 learner corpus, we describe the distribution, frequency, and spreading patterns of mouth actions in sixteen L2 learners at two time points. The data are compared with nine signers of an L1 control group.

The results reveal some differences in the use of mouth actions between the groups. The results are specifically related to the category of mouthing borrowed from spoken Swedish. L2 signers show an increased use of mouthing compared to L1 signers. Conversely, L1 signers exhibit an increased use of reduced mouthing compared with L2 signers. We also observe an increase of adverbial mouth gestures within the L2 group. The results are discussed in relation to previous findings, and within the framework of cross-linguistic influence.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19003.mes
2020-12-08
2021-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/sll.19003.mes/sll.19003.mes.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19003.mes&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson, Diane E. & Judy S. Reilly
    1998 PAH! The acquisition of adverbials in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics1(2). 117–142. 10.1075/sll.1.2.03and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.1.2.03and [Google Scholar]
  2. Bank, Richard, Onno Crasborn & Roeland van Hout
    2015 Alignment of two languages: The spreading of mouthings in Sign Language of the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingualism19(1). 40–55. doi:  10.1177/1367006913484991
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484991 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2016 The prominence of spoken language elements in a sign language. Linguistics54(6). 1281–1305. doi:  10.1515/ling‑2016‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0030 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Anastasia
    2019 When words meet signs: A corpus-based study on variation of mouthing in Russian Sign Language. InAnastasia Bauer & Daniel Bunčić (eds.), Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik, Specimina philologiae Slavicae198. 9–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergman, Brita & Lars Wallin
    2001 A preliminary analysis of visual mouth segments in Swedish Sign Language. InPenny Boyes Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign language, 51–68. Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2003 Noun and verbal classifiers in Swedish Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 35–51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bochner, Joseph H., Karen Christie, Peter C. Hauser & J. Matt Searls
    2011 When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning61(4). 1302–1327. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00671.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00671.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Börstell, Carl, Mats Wirén, Johanna Mesch & Moa Gärdenfors
    2016 Towards an annotation of syntactic structure in the Swedish Sign Language Corpus. InEleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen & Johanna Mesch (eds.), Workshop Proceedings: 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining, 19–24. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyes Braem, Penny
    2001 Functions of the mouthings in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS). InPenny Boyes Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 99–132. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyes Braem, Penny & Rachel Sutton-Spence
    (eds.) 2001The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Berlin: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brennan, Mary
    1992 The visual world of BSL: An introduction. InDavid Brien (ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English, 1, 1–133. London: Faber & Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Pichler, Debbie & Elena Koulidobrova
    2016 Acquisition of sign language as a second language. InMarc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies in language, 218–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe 2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, David Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch
    2008 Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics11(1). 45–67. doi: 10.1075/sl&l.11.1.04cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl&l.11.1.04cra [Google Scholar]
  15. Crasborn, Onno, Johanna Mesch, Dafydd Waters, Els van der Kooij, Bencie Woll & Brita Bergman
    2007 Sharing sign language data online: Experiences from the ECHO project. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics12(4). 535–562. 10.1075/ijcl.12.4.06cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.4.06cra [Google Scholar]
  16. Ebbinghaus, Horst & Jens Hessmann
    2001 Sign language as multidimensional communication: Why manual signs, mouthings, and mouth gestures are three different things. InPenny Boyes Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth. The mouth as articulator in sign language, 133–151. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Emmorey, Karen, Helsa B. Borinstein, Robin Thompson & Tamar H. Gollan
    2008 Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition11(1). 43–61. doi:  10.1017/S1366728907003203
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003203 [Google Scholar]
  18. Emmorey, Karen, Robin Thompson & Rachael Colvin
    2009 Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education14(2). 237–243. doi:  10.1093/deafed/enn037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn037 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferrara, Lindsay & Anna-Lena Nilsson
    2017 Describing spatial layouts as an L2M2 signed language learner. Sign Language & Linguistics20(1). 1–26. doi:  10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer [Google Scholar]
  20. Giustolisi, Beatrice, Emiliano Mereghetti & Carlo Cecchetto
    2017 Phonological blending or code mixing? Why mouthing is not a core component of sign language grammar. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory35(2). 347–365. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑016‑9353‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9353-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gulamani, Sannah, Chloë Marshall & Gary Morgan
    2020 The challenges of viewpoint-taking when learning a sign language: Data from the ‘frog story’ in British Sign Language. Second Language Research. doi:  10.1177/0267658320906855
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320906855 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gullberg, Marianne
    1998Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gullberg, Marianne, Kees De Bot & Virginia Volterra
    2008 Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture8(2). 149–179. doi:  10.1075/gest.8.2.03gul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.03gul [Google Scholar]
  24. Jarvis, Scott
    2015 The scope of transfer research. InLiming Yu & Terence Odlin (eds.), New perspectives on transfer in second language learning, 17–48. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783094349‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783094349-004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko
    2008Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge. doi:  10.1017/S0008413100001109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100001109 [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnston, Trevor, Jane van Roekel & Adam Schembri
    2016 On the conventionalization of mouth actions in Australian Sign Language. Language and Speech59(1). 3–42. doi:  10.1177/0023830915569334
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830915569334 [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    2007Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewin, Donna & Adam C. Schembri
    2011 Mouth gestures in British Sign Language: A case study of tongue protrusion in BSL narratives. Sign Language & Linguistics14(1). 94–114. doi:  10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew [Google Scholar]
  29. Liddell, Scott K.
    1980American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Marshall, Chloe & Gary Morgan
    2015 From gesture to sign language: Conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language. Topics in Cognitive Science7(1). 61–80. doi:  10.1111/tops.12118
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12118 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayberry, Rachel I.
    2006 Second language learning of sign languages. InKeith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 743–746. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/05260‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/05260-3 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mesch, Johanna & Krister Schönström
    2018 From design and collection to annotation of a learner corpus of sign language. InMayumi Bono, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch & Yutaka Osugi (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community [Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)], 121–126. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mesch, Johanna & Lars Wallin
    2015 Gloss annotations in the Swedish Sign Language Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics20(1). 102–120. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.20.1.05mes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.05mes [Google Scholar]
  34. Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard P. Meier
    2001 Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. InValerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah F. Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ortega, Gerardo
    2013Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: The role of sign structure and iconcity. London: University College London PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan
    2015a Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning65(3). 660–688. doi:  10.1111/lang.12123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12123 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2015b The effect of iconicity in the mental lexicon of hearing non-signers and proficient signers: evidence of cross-modal priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience30(5). 574–585. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2014.959533
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.959533 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015c Input processing at first exposure to a sign language. Second Language Research31(4). 443–463. doi:  10.1177/0267658315576822
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315576822 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ortega, Gerardo, Annika Schiefner & Aslı Özyürek
    2019 Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition191. 103–996. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  40. Racz-Engelhardt, Szilard
    2016Morphological properties of mouthings in Hungarian Sign Language (MJNY). Hamburg: University of Hamburg PhD dissertation. doi:  10.1075/sll.00016.eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00016.eng [Google Scholar]
  41. Ringbom, Håkan & Scott Jarvis
    2009 The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. InMichael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching, 106–118. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9781444315783.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rosen, Russell S.
    2004 Beginning L2 production errors in ASL lexical phonology: A cognitive phonology model. Sign Language & Linguistics7(1). 31–61. doi:  10.1075/sll.7.1.04beg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.7.1.04beg [Google Scholar]
  43. Schönström, Krister & Johanna Mesch
    2017 Dataset. The project ‘From speech to sign – learning Swedish Sign Language as a second language’. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wallin, Lars & Johanna Mesch
    2018Annoteringskonventioner för teckenspråkstexter. Version 6, januari 2018. [Annotation guidelines for sign language texts]. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19003.mes
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19003.mes
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error