1887
image of Phonological priming in German Sign Language
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A number of studies provide evidence for a phonological priming effect in the recognition of single signs based on phonological parameters and that the specific phonological parameters modulated in the priming effect can influence the robustness of this effect. This eye tracking study on German Sign Language examined phonological priming effects at the sentence level, while varying the phonological relationship between prime-target sign pairs. We recorded participants’ eye movements while presenting videos of sentences containing either related or unrelated prime-target sign pairs, and pictures of the target and an unrelated distractor. We observed a phonological priming effect for sign pairs sharing handshape and movement while differing in location parameter. Taken together, the data suggest a difference in the contribution of sign parameters to sign recognition and that sub-lexical features influence sign language processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19011.wie
2020-12-15
2021-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battison, Robbin
    1974 Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies5(1). 1–19. doi:  10.1353/sls.1974.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1974.0005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baus, Cristina , Eva Gutiérrez & Manuel Carreiras
    2014 The role of syllables in sign language production. Frontiers in Psychology5(1254). doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01254
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01254 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baus, Cristina , Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut , Josep Quer & Manuel Carreiras
    2008 Lexical access in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) production. Cognition108(3). 856–865. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brentari, Diane
    2006 Effects of language modality on word segmentation: An experimental study of phonological factors in a sign language. In Louis Goldstein , Douglas H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory Phonology, vol.8, 155–164. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carreiras, Manuel
    2010 Sign language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass4(7). 430–444. doi:  10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00192.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00192.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Carreiras, Manuel , Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut , Silvia Baquero & David P. Corina
    2008 Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language58(1). 100–122. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Caselli, Naomi K. & Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg
    2014 Lexical access in sign language: a computational model. Frontiers in Psychology5(428). doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00428
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00428 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Qi & Daniel Mirman
    2012 Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review119(2). 417–430. doi:  10.1037/a0027175
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Lorene E. & François Grosjean
    1982 Sign recognition processes in American Sign Language: The effect of context. Language and Speech25(4). 325–340. doi:  10.1177/002383098202500402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500402 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper, Roger M.
    1974 The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology6(1). 84–107. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(74)90005‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X [Google Scholar]
  11. Corina, David P. & Ursula C. Hildebrandt
    2002 Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in ASL. In Richard P. Meier , Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 88–111. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.005 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
    1997 Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In Jane Coerts & Heleen de Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.14.06cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.14.06cra [Google Scholar]
  13. Crystal, David
    2008Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444302776
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dink, Jacob W. & Brock Ferguson
    2015eyetrackingR: An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. www.eyetrackingr.com
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dye, Matthew W. G. & Shui-I. Shih
    2006 Phonological priming in British Sign Language. In Louis Goldstein , Douglas H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory Phonology, vol.8, 243–263. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Emmorey, Karen & David P. Corina
    1990 Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills71(3). 1227–1252. doi:  10.2466/pms.1990.71.3f.1227
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.71.3f.1227 [Google Scholar]
  17. Emmorey, Karen , Robin L. Thompson & Rachael Colvin
    2009 Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education14(2). 237–243. doi:  10.1093/deafed/enn037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn037 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grosjean, François
    1980 Sign and word recognition: a first comparison. Sign Language Studies32. 195–220. doi:  10.1353/sls.1982.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1982.0003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gutiérrez, Eva , Oliver Müller , Cristina Baus & Manuel Carreiras
    2012 Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish Sign Language lexical access. Neuropsychologia50(7). 1335–1346. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gutiérrez, Eva , Deborah Williams , Michael Grosvald & David P. Corina
    2012 Lexical access in American Sign Language: An ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology. Brain Research1468. 63–83. doi:  10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.029 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanna, Joy E. & Michael K. Tanenhaus
    2004 Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science28(1). 105–115. doi:  10.1207/s15516709cog2801_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2801_5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
    2006Deutsche Gebärdensprache: Ein Lehr-und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt/Main: Fachhochschulverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hildebrandt, Ursula & David P. Corina
    2002 Phonological similarity in American Sign Language. Language and Cognitive Processes17(6). 593–612. doi:  10.1080/01690960143000371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000371 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillinger, Michael L.
    1980 Priming effects with phonemically similar words. Memory & Cognition8(2). 115–123. doi:  10.3758/BF03213414
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213414 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hosemann, Jana
    2011 Eye gaze and verb agreement in German Sign Language: A first glance. Sign Language & Linguistics14(1). 76–93. doi:  10.1075/sll.14.1.05hos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.05hos [Google Scholar]
  26. Hosemann, Jana , Annika Herrmann , Markus Steinbach , Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky & Matthias Schlesewsky
    2013 Lexical prediction via forward models: N400 evidence from German Sign Language. Neuropsychologia51(11). 2224–2237. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hosemann, Jana , Nivedita Mani , Annika Herrmann , Markus Steinbach & Nicole Altvater-Mackensen
    2020 Signs activate their written word translation in deaf adults: An ERP study on cross-modal co-activation in German Sign Language. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics5(1). doi:  10.5334/gjgl.1014
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1014 [Google Scholar]
  28. Just, Marcel A. & Patricia A. Carpenter
    1980 A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review87(4). 329–354. doi:  10.1037//0033‑295X.87.4.329
    https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.87.4.329 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth
    1979Generative phonology: Description and theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kubus, Okan , Agnes Villwock , Jill P. Morford & Christian Rathmann
    2015 Word recognition in deaf readers: Cross-language activation of German Sign Language and German. Applied Psycholinguistics36(4). 831–854. doi:  10.1017/S0142716413000520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000520 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liddell, Scott K.
    1984  think and believe: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language60(2). 372–399. doi:  10.2307/413645
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413645 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
    1989 American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies64(1). 195–277. doi:  10.1353/sls.1989.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1989.0027 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lieberman, Amy M. , Arielle Borovsky , Marla Hatrak & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2015 Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition41(4). 1130–1139. doi:  10.1037/xlm0000088
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000088 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lieberman, Amy M. , Arielle Borovsky & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2017 Prediction in a visual language: real-time sentence processing in American Sign Language across development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience1–15. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2017.1411961
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1411961 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayberry, Rachel I. & Pamela Witcher
    2005 What age of acquisition effects reveal about the nature of phonological processing. Center for Research in Language Technical Reports17(3). 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Meade, Gabriela , Brittany Lee , Katherine J. Midgley , Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
    2018 Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience33(9). 1092–1106. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543 [Google Scholar]
  38. Meade, Gabriela , Katherine J. Midgley , Zed Sevcikova Sehyr , Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
    2017 Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study. Brain and Language170. 50–61. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Melinger, Alissa & Andrea Weber
    2006Database of noun associations for German. www.psycholing.es.uni-tuebingen.de/nag/index.php
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morford, Jill P. , Erin Wilkinson , Agnes Villwock , Pilar Piñar & Judith F. Kroll
    2011 When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations?Cognition118(2). 286–292. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Morgan, Gary , Sarah Barrett-Jones & Helen Stoneham
    2007 The first signs of language: Phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics28(01). 3–22. doi:  10.1017/S0142716407070014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070014 [Google Scholar]
  42. Orfanidou, Eleni , Robert Adam , James M. McQueen & Gary Morgan
    2009 Making sense of nonsense in British Sign Language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition. Memory & Cognition37(3). 302–315. doi:  10.3758/MC.37.3.302
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.3.302 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ormel, Ellen , Daan Hermans , Harry Knoors & Ludo Verhoeven
    2012 Cross-language effects in written word recognition: The case of bilingual deaf children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition15(2). 288–303. doi:  10.1017/S1366728911000319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000319 [Google Scholar]
  44. Perniss, Pamela M.
    2007Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Radboud University PhD dissertation. repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/30937
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pfau, Roland
    1997 Zur phonologischen Komponente der Deutschen Gebärdensprache: Segmente und Silben. Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen20. 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Radeau, Monique , José Morais & Juan Segui
    1995 Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21(6). 1297–1310. doi:  10.1037//0096‑1523.21.6.1297
    https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.21.6.1297 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sandler, Wendy
    1986 The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies50(1). 1–28. doi:  10.1353/sls.1986.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1986.0006 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  50. Siedlecki Jr, Theodore & John D. Bonvillian
    1993 Location, handshape & movement: Young children’s acquisition of the formational aspects of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies78(1). 31–52. doi:  10.1353/sls.1993.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1993.0016 [Google Scholar]
  51. Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & MaryBeth Hamburger
    1992 Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18(6). 1239–1250. doi:  10.1037//0278‑7393.18.6.1239
    https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.6.1239 [Google Scholar]
  52. Slowiaczek, Louisa M. , James M. McQueen , Emily G. Soltano & Michelle Lynch
    2000 Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language43(3). 530–560. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2000.2710
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2710 [Google Scholar]
  53. Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & David B. Pisoni
    1986 Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition14(3). 230–237. doi:  10.3758/BF03197698
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197698 [Google Scholar]
  54. Stokoe, William C.
    1960Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf (Studies in Linguistics. Occasional Papers 8). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education10(1), 3–37].
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Stokoe, William C. , Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Croneberg
    1965A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tanenhaus, Michael K. , Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton , Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy
    1995 Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science268(5217). 1632–1634. doi:  10.1126/science.7777863
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863 [Google Scholar]
  57. Thompson, Robin L. , Karen Emmorey & Tamar H. Gollan
    2005 “Tip of the fingers” experiences by Deaf signers. Insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychological Science16(11). 856–860. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2005.01626.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01626.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Thompson, Robin L. , Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender
    2006 The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: an eye-tracking study. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory24(2). 571–604. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑005‑1829‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-1829-y [Google Scholar]
  59. Thompson, Robin L. , David Vinson , Neil Fox & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2013 Is lexical access driven by temporal order or perceptual salience? Evidence from British Sign Language. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society35(35). 1450–1455.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Twilhaar, Jan N. & Beppie van den Bogaerde
    2016Concise lexicon for sign linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.201
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.201 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19011.wie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19011.wie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error