1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston 2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of this construction in ASL.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19014.hud
2020-12-15
2021-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarons, Debra & Philemon Akach
    1998 South African Sign Language – one language or many? A sociolinguistic question. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics31. 1–28. doi:  10.5774/31‑0‑55
    https://doi.org/10.5774/31-0-55 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarons, Debra & Ruth Morgan
    2000 The interaction of classifiers and syntax in South African Sign Language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics33. 1–20. doi:  10.5774/33‑0‑47
    https://doi.org/10.5774/33-0-47 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2003 Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies3(2). 125–156. doi:  10.1353/sls.2003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Antzakas, Klimis
    2006 The use of negative head movements in Greek Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 259–269. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Anne E., Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
    (eds.) 2016The linguistics of sign languages: an introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.199
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.199 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker-Shenk, Charlotte Lee
    1983A microanalysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of CaliforniaPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Branchini, Chiara
    2014On relativization and clefting: An analysis of Italian Sign Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501500008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caponigro, Ivano & Kathryn Davidson
    2011 Ask, and tell as well: Question-answer clauses in American Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics19(4). 323–371. doi:  10.1007/s11050‑011‑9071‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9071-0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidson, Kathryn & Ivano Caponigro
    2016 Embedding polar interrogative clauses in American Sign Language. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Annika Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: subordination in sign languages, 151–181. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Barros, Courtney & Ian Siebörger
    2016 Sentential negation in South African Sign Language: A case study. Literator37(2). 1–13. doi:  10.4102/lit.v37i2.1285
    https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v37i2.1285 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fischer, Susan D.
    2006 Questions and negation in American Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 166–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Glaser, Meryl & Ermien van Pletzen
    2012 Inclusive education for Deaf students: Literacy practices and South African Sign Language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies30(1). 25–37. doi:  10.2989/16073614.2012.693707
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.693707 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hauser, Charlotte
    2018 Question-answer pairs: the help of LSF. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory2. 44–55. doi:  10.31009/FEAST.i2.04
    https://doi.org/10.31009/FEAST.i2.04 [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrmann, Annika, Sina Proske & Elisabeth Volk
    2019 Question-answer pairs in sign languages. InKlaus von Heusinger, Edgar Onea Gaspar & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Questions in discourse – Volume 2: Pragmatics, 96–131. Leiden: Brill. doi:  10.1163/9789004378322_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378322_005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Holness, Willene
    2016 The development and use of sign language in South African schools: the denial of inclusive education. African Disability Rights Yearbook4. 141–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoza, Jack, Carol Neidle, Dawn MacLaughlin, Judy Kegl & Ben Bahan
    1997 A unified syntactic account of rhetorical questions in American Sign Language. InCarol Neidle, Dawn MacLaughlin & Robert G. Lee (eds.), Syntactic structure and discourse function: an examination of two constructions in American Sign Language, 1–23. Boston: Boston University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Janse Van Vuuren, Naomi
    2017An Exploratory Description of Classifiers in South African Sign Language. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiménez-Zafra, Salud María, Roser Morante, María Teresa Martín-Valdivia & L. Alfonso Ureña-López
    2018 A review of Spanish corpora annotated with negation. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 915–924. Santa Fe, NM: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston, Trevor
    2018 A corpus-based study of the role of headshaking in negation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): Implications for signed language typology. Linguistic Typology22(2). 185–231. doi:  10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston, Trevor, Miriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson
    2007 “Real data are messy”: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Australian Sign Language (Auslan), Vlaamse Gebarentaal (VGT), and Irish Sign Language (ISL). InPamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimmelman, Vadim, Ulrika Klomp & Marloes Oomen
    2018 Where methods meet: combining corpus data and elicitation in sign language research. InMayumi Bono, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch & Yutaka Osugi (eds.), 8th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community. LREC 2018 Workshop: proceedings, 95–100. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimmelman, Vadim & Lianne Vink
    2017 Question-answer pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language Studies17(4). 417–449. doi:  10.1353/sls.2017.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2017.0013 [Google Scholar]
  23. McKee, Rachel Locker
    2006 Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Morgan, Michael W.
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language (JSL). InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 91–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Morgan, Ruth, Meryl Glaser & Lucas Magongwa
    2016 Constructing and rolling out the new South African Sign Language (SASL) curriculum – reflexive critique. Per Linguam32(2). 15–29. doi:  10.5785/32‑2‑648
    https://doi.org/10.5785/32-2-648 [Google Scholar]
  26. Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert G. Lee
    2000The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Njeyiyana, Modiegi, Renata van Reenen, Alison Swannack & Michiko Kaneko
    . In prep. South Africa. InAnne E. Baker, Michiko Kaneko, Victoria Nyst, Eyassu Hailu Ramene & Atiyah Asmal eds. Sign languages in Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ogilvy Foreman, Dale, Claire Penn & Timothy Reagan
    1994 Selected syntactic features of South African Sign Language: a preliminary analysis. South African Journal of Linguistics12(4). 118–123. doi:  10.1080/10118063.1994.9723936
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1994.9723936 [Google Scholar]
  29. Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau
    2017 Signing not (or not): a typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology21(1). 1–51. doi:  10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Penn, Claire
    1992 The sociolinguistics of South African Sign Language. InRobert K. Herbert (ed), Language and society in South Africa, 277–284. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Penn, Claire & Timothy Reagan
    1990 How do you sign ‘apartheid’? The politics of South African Sign Language. Language Problems and Language Planning14. 91–103. doi:  10.1075/lplp.14.2.02pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.14.2.02pen [Google Scholar]
  32. 1994 The properties of South African Sign Language: Lexical diversity and syntactic unity. Sign Language Studies85. 319–327. doi:  10.1353/sls.1994.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1994.0011 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1995 On the other hand: Implications of the study of South African Sign Language for the education of the deaf in South Africa. South African Journal of Education15. 92–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pfau, Roland
    2008 The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on German Sign Language negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam1. 37–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2015 The grammaticalization of headshakes: From head movement to negative head. InAndrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research, 9–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.166.02pfa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.166.02pfa [Google Scholar]
  36. 2016 A featural approach to sign language negation. InPierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, 43–72. Berlin: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2002 V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa27. 73–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2016 Complex sentences in sign languages: Modality – typology – discourse. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Annika Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501503238‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503238-003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Quer, Josep
    2012 Negation. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 316–339. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reagan, Timothy
    2008 South African Sign Language and language-in-education policy in South Africa. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics38. 165–190. doi:  10.5774/38‑0‑28
    https://doi.org/10.5774/38-0-28 [Google Scholar]
  41. Reagan, Timothy & Claire Penn
    1997 Language policy, South African Sign Language, and the deaf: Social and educational implications. Southern African Journal of Applied Language Studies5. 1–13. doi:  10.1080/10189203.1997.9724654
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10189203.1997.9724654 [Google Scholar]
  42. Reagan, Timothy, Claire Penn & Dale Ogilvy
    2006 From policy to practice: Sign language developments in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Policy5. 187–208. doi:  10.1007/s10993‑006‑9002‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9002-y [Google Scholar]
  43. Roberts, Craige
    2012 Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics5(6). 1–69. doi:  10.3765/sp.5.6
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Storbeck, Claudine, Lucas Magongwa & Ingrid Parkin
    2009 Education of the Deaf in South Africa. InDonald F. Moores & Margery S. Miller (eds.), Deaf people around the world: educational and social perspectives, 133–144. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Storbeck, Claudine, David Martin, Ingrid Parkin, Lucas Magongwa, Bruno Peter Nkosi Druchen, Michelle Batchelor, Guy McIlroy, Deon de Villiers, Nazereen Captieux-Bhana, Lorato Rasebopye, Dorothy Rasebopye, Susanna Krige-Henderson, Frans Krige, Albie Louw, Tanya Surtees, A. L. Smit, Roy Cox & Murdock Henderson
    2010 South African Deaf education and the Deaf community. American Annals of the Deaf155(4). 488–518. 10.1353/aad.2010.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2010.0034 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Herreweghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Flemish Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 225–256. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2012 Data collection. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 1023–1045. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Niekerk, Andries, Kate Huddlestone & Anne E. Baker
    . In prep. Studying lexical variation in sign languages: the case of South African Sign Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Mieke van Herreweghe, Philemon Akach & Emily Matabane
    2007 Constituent order in Flemish Sign Language (VGT) and South African Sign Language (SASL): a cross-linguistic study. Sign Language & Linguistics10(1). 23–54. doi:  10.1075/sll.10.1.04ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.1.04ver [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilbur, Ronnie B.
    1994 Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics22(6). 647–672. doi:  10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90034‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90034-5 [Google Scholar]
  52. 1996 Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. InWilliam H. Edmonson & Ronnie B. Wilbur (eds.), International review of sign linguistics, vol.1, 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wright, Donovan
    2016A preliminary description of South African Sign Language syntax. Johannesburg: University of the WitwatersrandMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang, Jun Hui & Susan D. Fischer
    2002 Expressing negation in Chinese Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics5(2). 167–202. doi:  10.1075/sll.5.2.05yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.5.2.05yan [Google Scholar]
  55. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2004 Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology8(1). 1–58. doi:  10.1515/lity.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2006 Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 28–68. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19014.hud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.19014.hud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error