Emerging linguistic features of Sao Tome and Principe Sign Language

References

1. Al-Fityani, Kinda
   2007 Arab sign languages: A lexical comparison. Technical Report. Center for Research in Language Newsletter19(1).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aronoff, Mark , Irit Meir , Carol A. Padden & Wendy Sandler
   2008 The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies: Special Issue on Holophrasis vs. Compositionality in the Emergence of Protolanguage9(1). 131–150.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carmo, Patrícia , Ricardo Oliveira & Ana Mineiro
   2013 Dicionário da Língua Gestual de São Tomé e Príncipe – Dicionário oficial da República Democrática de São Tomé e Príncipe. Lisboa: UCEditora.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caroça, Cristina
   . In preparation. Contribution to the study of epidemiological factors associated with sensorineural hearing loss in the population of Sao Tome and Principe. Lisbon: Catholic University of Portugal. PhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cormier, Kearsy
   2012 Pronouns. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science), 227–244. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110261325.227
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.227 [Google Scholar]
6. Dachkovsky, Svetlana , Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler
   2013 Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology30(2). 211–252. doi: 10.1017/S0952675713000122
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675713000122 [Google Scholar]
7. Fischer, Susan & Harry van der Hulst
   2011 Sign language structures. In Mark Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, Volume1 (2nd edition), 336–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Frishberg, Nancy
   1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language51. 696–719. doi: 10.2307/412894
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412894 [Google Scholar]
9. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
   2003 The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kegl, Judy , Ann Senghas & Marie Coppola
    1999 Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Michael DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony, and development, 197–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kisch, Shifra
    2012 Demarcating generations of signers in the dynamic sociolinguistic landscape of a shared sign-language: the case of the Al-Sayyid Bedouin. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds.), Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights, 87–125. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9781614511496.87
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496.87 [Google Scholar]
12. Hockett, Charles F.
    1960 The origin of speech. Scientific American203. 88–111. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
13. Labov, William
    1994 Principles of linguistic change. Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: External factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Liddell, Scott K.
    1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
    2008 A language in space. The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Meir, Irit , Wendy Sandler , Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Emerging sign languages. In Mark Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, Volume2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Padden, Carol , Irit Meir , Wendy Sandler & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Against all expectations: Encoding subjects and objects in a new language. In Donna Gerdts , John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds). Hypothesis A / hypothesis B: Linguistics explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter, 383–400. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Perniss, Pamela , Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology1. 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
20. Sandler, Wendy
    2005 An overview of sign language linguistics. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed., 328–338. Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sandler, Wendy , Irit Meir , Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2005 The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS)102(7). 2661–2665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405448102
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102 [Google Scholar]
22. Sandler, Wendy
    2010 Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society108. 298–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01242.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01242.x [Google Scholar]
23. Sandler, Wendy , Irit Meir , Svetlana Dachkovsky , Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2011 The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua121(13). 2014–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007 [Google Scholar]
24. Senghas, Ann
    1995 Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: MITPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Senghas, Ann , Sotaro Kita & Aslı Özyürek
    2004 Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science305. 1779–1782. doi: 10.1126/science.1100199
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100199 [Google Scholar]
26. Senghas, Ann , Marie Coppola , Elissa Newport , Ted Supalla
    1997 Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: the emergence of grammatical devices. In Elizabeth Hughes , Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University conference on language development (BUCLD), 550–561. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Taub, Sarah F.
    2000 Iconicity in American Sign Language: Concrete and metaphorical applications. Spatial Cognition and Computation2(1). 31–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1011440231221
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011440231221 [Google Scholar]
28. Taub, Sarah. F.
    2001 Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
29. Woll, Bencie , Rachel Sutton-Spence & Frances Elton
    2001 Multilingualism: the global approach to sign language. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages, 8–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612824.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824.004 [Google Scholar]
30. Zeshan, Ulrike
    (ed.) 2006 Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. doi: 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]