Linearization constraints on sentential negation in Russian Sign Language are prosodic

References

1. Bruening, Benjamin
   2018 CPs move rightward, not leftward. Syntax21(4). 362–401. doi:  10.1111/synt.12164
   https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12164 [Google Scholar]
2. Bruening, Benjamin
   2019 On the motivation for phonology-free syntax and multiple levels in a derivational grammar. Manuscript.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, Noam
   1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112316009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, Noam
   2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. InAdriana Belletti. (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol.3, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij & Johan Ros
   2012 On the weight of phrase-final prosodic words in a sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics15(1). 11–38. doi:  10.1075/sll.15.1.02cra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.15.1.02cra [Google Scholar]
6. Davidson, Kathryn
   2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics and Pragmatics6(4). 1–44. doi:  10.3765/sp.6.4
   https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.4 [Google Scholar]
7. den Dikken, Marcel
   2006 Either-float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory24(3). 689–749. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑005‑2503‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-2503-0 [Google Scholar]
8. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
   2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry32(4). 555–595. doi:  10.1162/002438901753373005
   https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373005 [Google Scholar]
9. Geraci, Carlo & Carlo Cecchetto
   2013 Neglected cases of rightward movement: When wh-phrases and negative quantifiers go to the right. InGert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker. (eds.), Rightward movement in a comparative perspective, 211–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.200.08ger
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.200.08ger [Google Scholar]
10. Grenoble, Lenore
    1992 An overview of Russian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies77. 321–338. doi:  10.1353/sls.1992.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1992.0027 [Google Scholar]
11. Harizanov, Boris & Vera Gribanova
    2018 Whither head movement?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory37. 461–522. 461–522. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑018‑9420‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9420-5 [Google Scholar]
12. Hirsch, Aron
    2016 ‘DP conjunction’ as vP conjunction: A case for conjunction reduction. Proceedings of NELS46.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ivlieva, Natalia
    2013 Scalar implicatures and the grammar of plurality and disjunction. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyPhD dissertation. hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84418
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jantunen, Tommi
    2006 The complexity of lexical movements in FinSL. InMickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen & Kaius Sinnemäki. (eds.), A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday, 335–344. Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2007 Neregulyarnye otritsaniya v russkom zhestovom yazyke [Irregular negation in Russian Sign Language]. Moscow Student Conference on Linguistics. 89–103.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2012 Word order in Russian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies12(3). 414–445. doi:  10.1353/sls.2012.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2012.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2018 Basic argument structure in Russian Sign Language. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics3(1). 1–39. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.494
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.494 [Google Scholar]
18. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2019 Information structure in sign languages. Evidence from Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501510045
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510045 [Google Scholar]
19. Kimmelman, Vadim, Roland Pfau & Enoch O. Aboh
    2020 Argument structure of classifier predicates in Russian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory38. 539–579. doi:  10.1007/s11049‑019‑09448‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09448-9 [Google Scholar]
20. Kratzer, Angelika
    1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. InJohan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring. (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
21. Kremers, Joost
    2014 Parallel structures. Linguistics in Göttingen 1. webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/pub/mon/LinG/1-2014-kremers.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kremers, Joost
    2015 Morphology is in the eye of the beholder. Linguistische Berichte243. 245–294.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Matushansky, Ora
    2006 Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry37(1). 69–109. doi:  10.1162/002438906775321184
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321184 [Google Scholar]
24. Mitrović, Moreno
    2014 Morphosyntactic atoms of propositional logic. Cambridge: University of CambridgePhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Overfelt, Jason
    2015 Rightward movement: A study in locality. Amherst, MA: University of MassachusettsPhD dissertation. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1551&context=dissertations_2
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pasalskaya, Elena
    2018a Syntax of non-manual negation in Russian Sign Language. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of EconomicsBachelor’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pasalskaya, Elena
    2018b Sentential negation in Russian Sign Language. National Research University Higher School of EconomicsResearch Paper No. WP BRP 65/LNG/2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3270827or doi:  10.2139/ssrn.3270827
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3270827 [Google Scholar]
28. Pfau, Roland
    2016 A featural approach to sign language negation. InPierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee. (eds.), Negation and negative polarity. Cognitive and experimental perspectives, 45–74. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_3 [Google Scholar]
29. Ross, John
    1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyPhD dissertation. dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15166
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schein, Barry
    2017 ‘And’: Conjunction reduction redux. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10488.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10488.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Svenonius, Peter
    2012 Spanning. Manuscript. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001501
32. Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau
    2012 Coordination and subordination. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 340–364. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.340
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.340 [Google Scholar]
33. Timberlake, Alan
    2004 A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2004 Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology8(1). 1–58. doi:  10.1515/lity.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.003 [Google Scholar]
35. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2006 Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. InUlrike Zeshan. (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]
36. Zorzi, Giorgia
    2018 Coordination and gapping in Catalan Sign Language. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra UniversityPhD dissertation. hdl.handle.net/10803/665045
    [Google Scholar]
37. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2009 Prospects for top-down derivation. Catalan Journal of Linguistics8. 161–187. doi:  10.5565/rev/catjl.146
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.146 [Google Scholar]