1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Volume 25, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Adjectives are often identified via notional or even translational criteria in sign language research, which reflects a lack of formal criteria for identifying this part of speech in the field. This paper presents the results of a guided production task investigating the conservative hypothesis that ASL has a small, closed adjective class consisting only of terms for dimension, age, value, and color. Evidence from the syntactic distribution of these core properties compared to non-core properties will be presented to refute the initial hypothesis and show that ASL has an open adjective class. Its members are characterized by their ability to occur as prenominal modifiers without function-indicating morphosyntax. The semantic distinction between core and peripheral adjectives is nonetheless reflected in a significant preference for core adjectives to be used as modifiers rather than as sentential predicates. Postnominal property signs are analyzed as (in most cases) reduced relative clauses. I further suggest that prototypically verbal signs can be used as prenominal modifiers when they are embedded in reduced relative clauses.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
2022-01-24
2024-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarons, Debra, Benjamin Bahan, Judy Kegl & Carol Neidle
    1992 Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics15(2). 103–142. 10.1017/S0332586500002560
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500002560 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abner, Natasha
    2017 What you see is what you get.get: Surface transparency and ambiguity of nominalizing reduplication in American Sign Language. Syntax20(4). 317–352. 10.1111/synt.12147
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12147 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2021 Determiner phrases: theoretical perspectives. InJosep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 213–231. London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315754499‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754499-10 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Charlotte & Carol Padden
    1978 Focusing on the nonmanual component of ASL. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 25–27. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Mark
    2003 Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernath, Jeffrey
    2009 Articles and adjectives in ASL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010 Adjectives in ASL. Paper presented at the10th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Meeting (TISLR), West Lafayette.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolinger, Dwight
    1967 Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua18. 1–34. 10.1016/0024‑3841(67)90018‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1972 Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110877786
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boster, Carole T.
    1996 On the quantifier-noun phrase split in American Sign Language and the structure of quantified noun phrases. International Review of Sign Linguistics1. 159–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Braze, David
    2004 Aspectual inflection, verb raising and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua114. 29–58. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00034‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00034-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
    2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513-10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cinque, Guglielmo
    2005 Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry36(3). 315–332. 10.1162/0024389054396917
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2010 The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, William
    1991 Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1982 Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110822939
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822939 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 Adjective classes in typological perspective. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, Susan & Robert Johnson
    1982 Nominal markers in ASL. Paper presented at theLinguistic Society of America, San Diego, 27–30 December 1982. Reprinted inSign Language & Linguistics15(2) 2012, 243–250.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Frawley, William
    1992 Linguistic semantics. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gee, James Paul & Judy Kegl
    1983 Performance structures, discourse structures, and ASL. Unpublished manuscript, Hampshire College and Northeastern University.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology11. 119–132. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hengeveld, Kees
    1992 Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110883282
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883282 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hetzron, Robert
    1978 On the relative order of adjectives. InHansjakob Seiler (ed.), Language universals, 165–184. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kagan, Olga
    2015 Scalarity in the verbal domain: The case of verbal prefixation in Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kennedy, Chris
    2001 Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy24(1). 33–70. 10.1023/A:1005668525906
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005668525906 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kennedy, Chris & Beth Levin
    2002 Telicity corresponds to degree of change. Unpublished ms., Northwestern University and Stanford University.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Larson, Richard K.
    1998 Events and modification in nominals. InDevon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic TheoryVIII, 145–168. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.3765/salt.v8i0.2803
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v8i0.2803 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liddell, Scott K.
    1978 Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 59–90. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. MacLaughlin, Dawn
    1997 The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. Boston, MA: University of Boston PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mayberry, Rachel
    1993 First language acquisition after childhood differs from second language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research36. 1258–1270. 10.1044/jshr.3606.1258
     https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1258 [Google Scholar]
  33. Neidle, Carol & Joan Nash
    2012 The noun phrase. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 265–292. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.265
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.265 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ormel, Ellen & Onno Crasborn
    2012 Prosodic correlates of sentences in signed languages: A literature review and suggestions for new types of studies. Sign Language Studies12(2). 279–315. 10.1353/sls.2011.0019
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2011.0019 [Google Scholar]
  35. Padden, Carol A.
    1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Padden, Carol A. & David M. Perlmutter
    1987 American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory5. 335–375. 10.1007/BF00134553
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134553 [Google Scholar]
  37. Petronio, Karen
    1993 Clause structure in American Sign Language. Seattle: University of Washington PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Plank, Frans
    1984 24 grundsätzliche Bemerkungen zur Wortartenfrage. Leuvense Bijdragen73. 489–520.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rosch, Eleanor
    1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology4(3). 328–350. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sampson, Tory & Rachel Mayberry
    2019 The predicate self: Discovering the syntactic function of self. Paper presented at the13th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research conference (TISLR), Hamburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sandler, Wendy
    1993 A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology10. 243–279. 10.1017/S0952675700000051
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000051 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
    1993 Syntactic categories and subcategories. InJoachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationals Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An international handbook of contemporary research, 646–686. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110095869.1.11.646
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110095869.1.11.646 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schwager, Waldemar & Ulrike Zeshan
    2008 Word classes in sign languages: Criteria and classifications. Studies in Language32. 509–545. 10.1075/sl.32.3.03sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.3.03sch [Google Scholar]
  44. Sedivy, Julie C., Michael K. Tanenhaus, Craig G. Chambers & Gregory N. Carlson
    1999 Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition71(2). 109–147. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00025‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sleeman, Petra
    2017 Participial relative clauses. InMark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics [185] (Oxford Research Encyclopedias), Oxford University Press.   10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.185
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.185 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sproat, Richard & Chilin Shih
    1988 Pre-nominal adjectival ordering in English and Mandarin. Proceedings of NELS12. 465–489.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport
    1978 How many seats in a chair: The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–131. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas
    2000 Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, Shuyan
    2019 Adjectives or relative clauses: A new perspective on adjectives in American Sign Language. Poster presented at the13th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research conference (TISLR), Hamburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wienholz, Anne, Amy M. Lieberman, Simon Kirby & Paula Rubio-Fernández
    2019 Effects of semantics and efficiency on adjective position in American Sign Language: A reference production study. Poster presented at the13th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research conference (TISLR), Hamburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1986 What’s in a noun? (Or: How do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?). Studies in Language10(2). 353–389. 10.1075/sl.10.2.05wie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.10.2.05wie [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilbur, Ronnie
    1994 Eye blinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies84. 221–240. 10.1353/sls.1994.0019
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1994.0019 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2017 Internally-headed relative clauses in sign languages. Glossa2(1). 1–34. 10.5334/gjgl.183
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.183 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
Loading
Sizing up adjectives
Sign Language & Linguistics 25, 30 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.20011.loo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adjectives; American Sign Language; part-of-speech; relative clauses

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error