On question words in Czech Sign Language

References

1. Abner, Natasha
   2011 Wh-words that go bump in the right. InMary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics28, 24–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aboh, Enoch, Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan
   2005 When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. InTanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110186185.11
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186185.11 [Google Scholar]
3. Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
   2005 The paradox of sign language morphology. Language81(2). 301–344. 10.1353/lan.2005.0043
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0043 [Google Scholar]
4. Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
   2004 Morphological universals and the sign language type. InGeert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 19–39. Dordrecht: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Battison, Robin
   1978 Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring: Linstok Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brennan, Mary
   1990 Word formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
   2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A language with multiple origins. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119. Mehwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513‑10
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513-10 [Google Scholar]
8. Brentari, Diane & Petra Eccarius
   2010 Handshape contrasts in sign language phonology. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.014
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.014 [Google Scholar]
9. Cecchetto, Carlo
   2012 Sentence types. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 292–315. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261325.292
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.292 [Google Scholar]
10. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2013 Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online atwals.info/chapter/93, accessed on2021-08-10.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Feist, Timothy Richard
    2011 A grammar of Skolt Saami. Manchester: University of Manchester PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fischer, Susan & Yutaka Osugi
    1998 Feature movement in wh-questions: Evidence from sign languages. Paper presented at the6th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fischer, Susan
    2006 Questions and negation in American Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Galloway, Teresa
    2012 Distinguishing correlatives from internally headed relative clauses in ASL. Paper presented atSemantics of Under-represented Languages 7, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hronová, Anna
    2002 Poznáváme český znakový jazyk 3 (tázací věty). Specialní pedagogika12(2). 113–123.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Karlík, Petr & Roland Meyer
    2017 Tázací zájmeno. InPetr Karlík, Marek Nekula & Jana Pleskalová (eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Brno: Masaryk University. Available athttps://www.czechency.org/slovnik/TÁZACÍ/ZÁJMENO, accessed on2021-8-27.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kubuş, Okan
    2010 Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Poster presented atTheoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lepic, Ryan
    2015 Motivation in morphology: Lexical patterns in ASL and English. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Liddell, Scott & Robert Johnson
    1986 American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory4(4). 445–513. 10.1007/BF00134470
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134470 [Google Scholar]
21. Mandel, Mark
    1981 Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Masaryk University
    Masaryk University 2020 Dictio: Multilingual online dictionary. Available athttps://www.dictio.info/
    [Google Scholar]
23. McKee, Rachel
    2006 Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol Padden
    2010 Sign languages and compounding. InSergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.311.23mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.23mei [Google Scholar]
25. Morgan, Michael
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language (JSL). InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 91–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Padden, Carol
    1998 The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics, 1(1). 39–60. 10.1075/sll.1.1.04pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.1.1.04pad [Google Scholar]
27. Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
    1997 Wh-movement and the position of Spec CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language73. 18–57. 10.2307/416592
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416592 [Google Scholar]
28. Pfau, Roland, & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
29. Pfau, Roland
    2016 Morphology. InAnne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.), The linguistics of sign languages. An introduction, 197–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.199.09pfa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.199.09pfa [Google Scholar]
30. Pospíšilová, Marie
    2012 Tázací výrazy v českém znakovém jazyce. Prague: Charles University BA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Quadros, Ronice Müller de
    2003 Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. InAnne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 141–162. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Quadros, Ronice Müller de
    2006 Questions in Brazilian Sign Language (LSB). InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 270–283. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    (eds.) 2017 SignGram blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511806
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
34. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
35. Sandler, Wendy
    1989 Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110250473
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110250473 [Google Scholar]
36. Santoro, Mirko
    2018 Compounds in sign languages: The case of Italian and French Sign Language. Paris: School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Spencer, Andrew
    2016 Two morphologies or one?: Inflection versus word-formation. InAndrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 27–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139814720.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Van Herreweghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Flemish Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vlášková, Lucia & Hana Strachoňová
    2021 Sign language lexicography: a case study of an online dictionary. Slovenščina 2.0: Empirical, Applied and Interdisciplinary Research9(1). 90–122. 10.4312/slo2.0.2021.1.90‑122
    https://doi.org/10.4312/slo2.0.2021.1.90-122 [Google Scholar]
40. Wilbur, Ronnie B.
    1996 Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. InWilliam H. Edmondson & Ronnie B. Wilbur (eds.), International review of sign linguistics, 209–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2002 Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 153–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2004 Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language80(1). 7–39. 10.1353/lan.2004.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0050 [Google Scholar]
43. Zeshan, Ulrike
    (ed.) 2006a Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]
44. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2006b Negative and interrogative structures in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). InUlrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 128–164. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_453832
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_453832 [Google Scholar]