1887
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of late sign language exposure on narrative development in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) by focusing on the introductions of main characters and the linguistic strategies used in these introductions. We study these domains by comparing narrations produced by native and late signers in TİD. The results of our study reveal that late sign language exposure does not hinder the acquisition of linguistic devices to introduce main characters in narrations. Thus, their acquisition seems to be resilient to the effects of late language exposure. Our study further suggests that a two-year exposure to sign language facilitates the acquisition of these skills in signing children even in the case of late language exposure, thus providing further support for the importance of sign language exposure to develop linguistic skills for signing children.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.21004.gur
2022-11-11
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ariel, Mira
    1990Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bahtiyar, Sevda & Aylin C. Küntay
    2009 Integration of communicative partner’s visual perspective in patterns of referential requests. Journal of Child Language36(3). 529–555. 10.1017/S0305000908009094
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009094 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg, Michael G.
    1987The acquisition of narratives: Learning to use language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110854190
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854190 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steven Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, Claudia
    2009 Narrative competences of deaf children in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics12(2). 113–160. 10.1075/sll.12.2.02bec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.12.2.02bec [Google Scholar]
  6. Berk, Stephanie & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2012 The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic or cognitive constraints?Cognitive Psychology65(1). 118–140. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Berman, Ruth A.
    1995 Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History51. 285–314. 10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001 Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. InKeith E. Nelson, Ayhan Aksu-Koç & Carolyn E. Johnson (eds.), Children’s Language101, 1–27. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boudreault, Patrick & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2006 Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes21(5). 608–635. 10.1080/01690960500139363
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500139363 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chafe, Wallace
    1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, Qi & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2019 Acquiring a first language in adolescence: The case of basic word order in American Sign Language. Journal of Child Language46(2). 214–240. 10.1017/S0305000918000417
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000417 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri, David Vinson & Eleni Orfanidou
    2012 First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language. Cognition124(1). 50–65. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cormier, Kearsy & Sandra Smith
    2008 Acquisition of perspective and role shift in Deaf children: Evidence from British Sign Language. Presentation at theWorkshop on pragmatics and social cognition. Centre for Human Communication, University College London, 25–26 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova
    2013a Predicate structures, gesture, and simultaneity in the representation of action in British Sign Language: Evidence from deaf children and adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education18(3). 370–390. 10.1093/deafed/ent020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent020 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
    2015 Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics18(2). 167–204. 10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor [Google Scholar]
  16. Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Martine Zwets
    2013b Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics551. 119–139. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Frederiksen, Anne Therese & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2016 Who’s on first? Investigating the referential hierarchy in simple native ASL narratives. Lingua1801. 49–68. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Girbau, Dolors
    2001 Children’s referential communication failure: The ambiguity and abbreviation of message. Journal of Language and Social Psychology20(1/2). 81–89. 10.1177/0261927X01020001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020001004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Givon, Talmy
    1984 Universals of discourse structure and second language acquisition. InWilliam E. Rutherford (ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition, 109–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.5.10giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.5.10giv [Google Scholar]
  20. Gleason, Jean B. & Richard Ely
    2002 Gender differences in language development. InAnn McGillicuddy-De Lisi & Richard De Lisi (eds.), Biology, society and behaviour, 127–154. Westport, CT: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Henner, Jon, Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris, Rama Novogrodsky & Robert Hoffmeister
    2016 American Sign Language syntax and analogical reasoning skills are influenced by early acquisition and age of entry to signing schools for the deaf. Frontiers in Psychology71 1982 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01982
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01982 [Google Scholar]
  22. Herman, Rosalind, Nicola Grove, Sallie Holmes, Gary Morgan, Hilary Sutherland & Bencie Woll
    2004Assessing BSL development: Production test (narrative skills). London: City University Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickmann, Maya
    1982The development of narrative skills: Pragmatic and metapragmatic aspects of discourse cohesion. Chicago: The University of Chicago PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995 Discourse organization and the development of reference to person, time, and space. InPaul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), Handbook of child language, 194–218. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hodge, Gabrielle, Lindsay N. Ferrara, & Benjamin D. Anible
    2019 The semiotic diversity of doing reference in a deaf signed language. Journal of Pragmatics1431. 33–53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.025 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hudson, Judith A. & Lauren R. Shapiro
    1991 From knowing to telling: The development of children’s scripts, stories and personal narratives. InAllyssa McCabe & Carole Peterson (eds.), Developing narrative structure, 89–136. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. İlkbaşaran, Deniz
    2015Literacies, mobilities and agencies of Deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaeger, T. Florian
    2008 Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language59(4). 434–446. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    2007Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, Anna C., E. Toscano, Nicola Botting, Joanna R. Atkinson, Tanya Denmark, Ros Herman & Gary Morgan
    2016 Narrative skills in deaf children who use spoken English: Dissociations between macro- and microstructural devices. Research in Developmental Disabilities591. 268–282. 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kail, Michele & Maya Hickmann
    1992 French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language12(34). 73–94. 10.1177/014272379201203405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379201203405 [Google Scholar]
  32. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
    2021 Effects and non-effects of late language exposure on spatial language development: Evidence from deaf adults and children. Language Learning and Development17(1). 1–25. 10.1080/15475441.2020.1823846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1823846 [Google Scholar]
  33. . Under Review. Signing children’s spatial expressions are more informative than speaking children’s speech and gestures combined.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Karadöller, Dilay Z., Beyza Sümer, Ercenur Ünal & Aslı Özyürek
    2022 Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults. Memory & Cognition501. 1–19. 10.3758/s13421‑022‑01281‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Karmiloff-Smith, Annette
    1981 The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. InWerner Deutsch (ed.), The child’s construction of language, 121–147. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Küntay, Aylin C.
    1999 How do Turkish preschoolers anchor referents in conversational extended discourse?Psychology of Language and Communication3(1). 83–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2002 Development of the expression of indefiniteness: Presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes33(1). 77–101. 10.1207/S15326950DP3301_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3301_04 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lillo-Martin, Diane & Jonathan Henner
    2021 Acquisition of sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics71. 395–419. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑043020‑092357
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-043020-092357 [Google Scholar]
  40. Loew, Ruth Carolyn
    1984Roles and reference in American Sign Language: A developmental perspective. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva
    (eds.) 2017The contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary. Ankara: The Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy. Retrieved fromtidsozluk.net
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mayberry, Rachel I.
    1993 First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research36(6). 1258–1270. 10.1044/jshr.3606.1258
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1258 [Google Scholar]
  43. 1998 The critical period for language acquisition and the deaf child’s language comprehension: A psycholinguistic approach. Bulletin D Audiophonologie141. 349–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2007 When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics28(3). 537–549. 10.1017/S0142716407070294
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070294 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mayberry, Rachel I. & Ellen B. Eichen
    1991 The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language301. 486–512. 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90018‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90018-F [Google Scholar]
  46. Mayberry, Rachel I. & Susan D. Fischer
    1989 Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of nonnative sign language processing. Memory and Cognition171. 740–754. 10.3758/BF03202635
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202635 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mayberry, Rachel I. & Elizabeth Lock
    2003 Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and Language87(3). 369–384. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00137‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00137-8 [Google Scholar]
  48. McCabe, Allyssa & Carole Peterson
    1990 What makes a narrative memorable?Applied Psycholinguistics11(1). 73–82. 10.1017/S0142716400008298
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008298 [Google Scholar]
  49. McKee, Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee & Trevor Johnston
    2011 Variable “subject” presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change23(3). 375–398. 10.1017/S0954394511000123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000123 [Google Scholar]
  50. Morford, Jill P.
    2003 Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners. Linguistics411. 681–721. 10.1515/ling.2003.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.022 [Google Scholar]
  51. Morgan, Gary
    1998The development of discourse cohesion in British Sign Language. Bristol: University of Bristol PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2002 Children’s encoding of simultaneity in British Sign Language narratives. Sign Language & Linguistics5(2). 131–165. 10.1075/sll.5.2.04mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.5.2.04mor [Google Scholar]
  53. 2006 The development of narrative skills in British Sign Language. InBrenda Schick, Marc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 314–343. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Morgan, Gary & Bencie Woll
    2003 The development of reference switching encoded through body classifiers in British Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 297–310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Newport, Elissa L.
    1988 Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences10(1). 147–172. 10.1016/0388‑0001(88)90010‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(88)90010-1 [Google Scholar]
  56. 1990 Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science141. 11–28. 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 [Google Scholar]
  57. Newport, Elissa & Ted Supalla
    2000 Sign language research at the millennium. InKaren Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 94–103. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. O’Neil, Daniela K. & Francesca G. Happe
    2000 Noticing and commenting on what’s new: differences and similarities among 22-month-old typically developing children, children with Down Syndrome, and children with autism. Developmental Science31. 457–478. 10.1111/1467‑7687.00139
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00139 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ortega, Gerardo, Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
    2017 Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology53(1). 89–99. 10.1037/dev0000161
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000161 [Google Scholar]
  60. Padden, Carol
    1986 Verbs and role shifting in American Sign Language. InCarol Padden (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, 44–57. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Papafragou, Anna & Myrto Grigoroglou
    2019 The role of conceptualization during language production: evidence from event encoding. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience34(9). 1117–1128. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1589540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1589540 [Google Scholar]
  62. Perniss, Pamela & Aslı Özyürek
    2015 Visible cohesion: A comparison of reference tracking in sign, speech, and co-speech gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science71. 36–60. 10.1111/tops.12122
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12122 [Google Scholar]
  63. Peterson, Carole
    1990 The who, when, and where of early narratives. Journal of Child Language17(2). 433–456. 10.1017/S0305000900013854
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013854 [Google Scholar]
  64. Peterson, Carole & Allyssa McCabe
    1983Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a narrative. New York: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑0608‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0608-6 [Google Scholar]
  65. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Ramirez, Naja F., Amy Lieberman & Rachel I. Mayberry
    2013 The initial stages of language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language40(2). 391–414. 10.1017/S0305000911000535
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000535 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rathmann, Christian, Wolfgang Mann & Gary Morgan
    2007 Narrative structure and narrative development in deaf children. Deafness & Education International9(4). 187–196. 10.1179/146431507790559932
    https://doi.org/10.1179/146431507790559932 [Google Scholar]
  68. Reilly, Judy
    2000 Bringing affective expression into the service of language: Acquiring perspective marking in narratives. InKaren Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 415–433. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schaeffer, Jeannette & Lisa Matthewson
    2005 Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory23(1). 53–101. 10.1007/s11049‑004‑5540‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-5540-1 [Google Scholar]
  70. Slobin, Dan I., Nini Hoiting, Marlon Kuntze, Reyna Lindert, Amy Weinberg, Jennie Pyers, Michelle Anthony, Yael Biederman & Helen Thumann
    2003 A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages, 271–296. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sümer, Beyza
    2015Scene-setting and referent introduction in Turkish and Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili– TİD): What does modality tell us?İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Master’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sümer, Beyza & Aslı Özyürek
    2022 Cross-modal investigation of event component omissions in language development: a comparison of signing and speaking children. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience371. 1–17. 10.1080/23273798.2022.2042336
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2042336 [Google Scholar]
  73. Supalla, Ted R.
    1982Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Swabey, Laurie A.
    2011 Referring expressions in ASL discourse. InCynthia B. Roy (ed.), Discourse in signed languages, 96–120. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2rh28s4.10
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh28s4.10 [Google Scholar]
  75. Talmy, Leonard
    2003 The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language, 169–195. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Umiker-Sebeok, D. Jean
    1979 Preschool children’s intra-conversational narratives. Journal of Child Language6(1). 91–109. 10.1017/S0305000900007649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007649 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wigglesworth, Gillian
    1990 Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language10(29). 105–25. 10.1177/014272379001002902
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002902 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes
    2006 ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of LREC 2006. Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Wulf, Alyssa, Paul Dudis, Robert Bayley & Ceil Lucas
    2002 Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies3(1). 54–76. 10.1353/sls.2002.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2002.0027 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.21004.gur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.21004.gur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error