1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Volume 27, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As most other sign languages, Hong Kong Sign Language (HKSL) makes use of verbal classifiers for the purpose of spatial predication. However, a thorough study of the Asian SignBank shows that these same classifier handshapes occur in 76% of all HKSL nouns. In this paper, I argue that these classifier handshapes embedded in nouns are in fact noun classifiers. Under the framework of Distributed Morphology, classifier handshapes are underspecified roots in root compounds which can be assigned the nominal category when merged with a nominal functional head in syntax. The function of these classifiers is to identify, and categorize a discourse referent, and they are full-fledged classifiers according to standards set by the general linguistic literature on classifiers. In addition to verbal and noun classifiers, I also briefly show how HKSL uses mensural numeral classifiers to intervene between mass nouns and numerals within the NP. Taken together, this means that HKSL employs three different types of classifiers: verbal, noun, and numeral classifiers.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
2024-01-16
2024-10-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Karen L. & Nancy F. Conklin
    1973 Towards a theory of natural classification. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society9(1). 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2000 Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou
    2007 Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207491
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allan, Keith
    1977 Classifiers. Language531. 285–311. 10.1353/lan.1977.0043
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0043 [Google Scholar]
  5. Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
    2004 Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory221. 743–810. 10.1007/s11049‑003‑4698‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergman, Brita & Lars Wallin
    2001 The discourse function of noun classifiers in Swedish Sign Language. InValerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: discoveries from international research, 45–61. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2003 Noun and verbal classifiers in Swedish Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifiers in sign languages, 35–52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blankenship, Barbara
    1997 Classificatory verbs in Cherokee. Anthropological Linguistics39(1). 92–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
    2001 A language with multiple origins: native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign language: a cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513-10 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen & Rint Sybesma
    1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry301. 509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chierchia, Gennaro
    2010 Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese1741. 99–149. 10.1007/s11229‑009‑9686‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William
    1994 Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word451. 145–171. 10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dékány, Éva
    2015 A főnévi kifejezés összetevői. [Elements of the noun phrase]. InS. Balázs (ed.), A magyar jelnyelv nyelvtani vázlata [A grammatical sketch of Hungarian Sign Language], 109–171. Manuscript, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Denny, J. Peter
    1976 What are noun classifiers good for?InSalikoko S. Mufwene, Carol A. Walker & Sanford B. Steever (eds.), Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 122–132.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Drapeau, Lynn & Renée Lambert-Brétière
    2011 Verbal classifiers in Innu. Anthropological Linguistics53(4). 293–322. 10.1353/anl.2011.0025
     https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2011.0025 [Google Scholar]
  16. Glück, Susanne & Roland Pfau
    1998 On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. InTina Cambier-Langeveld, Anikó Lipták & Michael Redford (eds.), Proceedings of ConSole61, 59–74. Leiden: SOLE.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 1999 A Distributed Morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign LanguageInTina Cambier-Langeveld, Anikó Lipták, Michael Redford & Erik Jan van der Torre (eds.), Proceedings of ConSole71, 66–80. Leiden: SOLE.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Grinevald, Colette
    2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. InGunter Senft (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2003 Classifier systems in the context of a topology of nominal classification. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 91–109. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2015 Linguistics of classifiers. InJames D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopaedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 3, 811–818. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53003‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53003-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Halle, Morris
    1990 An approach to morphology. Proceedings of NELS201. 150–185.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. InKen Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Harley, Heidi
    2011 Compounding in Distributed Morphology. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelly, Justin Robert
    2013 The syntax-semantics interface in Distributed Morphology. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimmelman, Vadim, Roland Pfau & Enoch O. Aboh
    2020 Argument structure of classifier predicates in Russian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory381. 539–579. 10.1007/s11049‑019‑09448‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09448-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Koenders, Emily
    2023 A count-mass typology for Hong Kong Sign Language. Buckeye East Asian Linguistics Forum Proceedings71. 85–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lawton, Ralph
    1993 Topics in the description of Kiriwina. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Marantz, Alec
    1997 No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. InAlexis Dimitriadis (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2), 201–225.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Meir, Irit
    2001 Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli Sign Language. InGeert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1999, 299–319. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3722‑7_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3722-7_11 [Google Scholar]
  30. Okubo, Tatsuhiro
    2013 Two types of compounds in Distributed Morphology (part II: regular papers). Tsukuba English Studies321. 147–158.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll
    2012 Sign language: an international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ribera-Llonc, Eulàlia, M. Teresa Espinal & Josep Quer
    2019 The noun-verb distinction in Catalan Sign Language: an exo-skeletal approach. Sign Language & Linguistics22(1). 1–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Santoro, Mirko
    2018 Compounds in sign languages: the case of Italian and French Sign Language. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schembri, Adam
    1996 The structure and formation of signs in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). North Rocks: North Rocks Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Senft, Gunter
    1986 Kilivila: The language of Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110861846
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861846 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1996 Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195092110.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092110.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Supalla, Ted
    1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. InColette G. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.7.13sup
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.7.13sup [Google Scholar]
  38. 1990 Serial verbs of motion in ASL. InSusan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 127–152. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport
    1978 How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–132. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Wallin, Lars
    1996 Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2007 Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica611. 170–184. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2007.00131.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00131.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Zwitserlood, Inge
    2003 Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 2008 Morphology below the level of the sign: “frozen” forms and classifier predicates. InJosep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: selected papers from TISLR81, 251–272. Seedorf: Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2012 Classifiers. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: an international handbook, 158–185. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.158
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.158 [Google Scholar]
  45. Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
    Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Asian SignBank. cslds.org/asiansignbank/
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
Loading
Noun classifiers in Hong Kong Sign Language
Sign Language & Linguistics 27, 35 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22004.koe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier typology; Distributed Morphology; Hong Kong Sign Language; noun classifiers; numeral classifiers; root compounds; verbal classifiers

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error