1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Volume 27, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article argues that Role Shift in Japanese Sign Language involves a mechanism that is different in two respects from indexical shift observed in some spoken languages. First, its domain is not a clausal domain (CP or IP), but the (propositional) domain, in which roles are assigned. Second, what is shifted by this mechanism is not indexicals, but the objective Point-of-View from which the reported event is perceived. These characteristics apply to both Action Role Shift and Quotational Role Shift. It is claimed that Quotational Role Shift is a subcase of Action Role Shift where the domain contains a predicate of propositional attitude. The attitude predicate takes a CP complement which in turn contains another operator. This second operator is the same as that found in some spoken languages, and it shifts the context for the interpretation of indexicals. The proposed analysis thus employs two types of operators, one taking the domain as its scope and the other operating on the clausal domain. The analysis can be extended to account for crosslinguistic variation reported on the shifted interpretation of locative/temporal expressions in sign languages.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
2024-10-10
2025-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins
    2004 Shifty operators in changing contexts. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)XIV1. 20–37. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2913
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2913 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Giorgia Zorzi, Doriane Gras, Charlotte Hauser, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto
    2022 On the nature of role shift: Insights from a comprehension study in different populations of LIS, LSC and LSF signers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory411. 459–500. 10.1007/s11049‑022‑09539‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-022-09539-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Noam, T. Daniel Seely, Robert C. Berwick, Sandiway Fong, M. A. C. Huybregts, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Andrew McInnerney & Yushi Sugimoto
    2023 Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Published online: 10.1017/9781009343244. Accessed onNovember 25, 2023].
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343244 [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidson, Donald
    1967 The logical form of action sentences. InDonald Davidson 2001 Essays on actions and events (2nd edition), 105–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson, Kathryn
    2015 Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy38(6). 477–520. 10.1007/s10988‑015‑9180‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9180-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deal, Amy Rose
    2020 Theory of indexical shift. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12374.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12374.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 2015 Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics 2015(1). 411–431. 10.1515/opli‑2015‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Farkas, Donka
    1992 On the semantics of subjunctive complements. InPaul Hirschbühler & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.91.07far
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91.07far [Google Scholar]
  11. Gan, Linghui Eva
    2021 Shifted indexicals in Hong Kong Sign Language with(-out) role shift. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory (FEAST)51. 74–86. 10.31009/FEAST.i4.06
     https://doi.org/10.31009/FEAST.i4.06 [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach
    2012 Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. InIsabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15.12her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.12her [Google Scholar]
  13. Higginbotham, James
    1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry16(4). 547–593.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2000 On events in linguistic semantics. InJames Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195128079.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195128079.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ichida, Yasuhiro
    2005 Shuwa-no gengogaku 7. Hanashite-no shintai-to shisen. (Linguistics of sign language 7. The signer’s body and gaze). Gekkan Gengo34(7). 92–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lewis, David
    1979 Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review88(4). 513–543. 10.2307/2184843
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2184843 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lillo-Martin, Diane
    1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012 Utterance reports and constructed action. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.365
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.365 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice Müller de Quadros
    2011 Acquisition of syntax-discourse interface: The expression of point of view. Lingua1211. 623–636. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mandel, Mark
    1977 Iconic devices in American Sign Language. InLynn A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 57–107. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Maier, Emar
    2018 Quotation, demonstration, and attraction in sign language role shift. Theoretical Linguistics44(3–4). 265–276. 10.1515/tl‑2018‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier, Richard P.
    1990 Person deixis in American Sign Language. InSusan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll
    2012 Tense, aspect, and modality. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.186
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.186 [Google Scholar]
  24. Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller
    1995 On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Pyers, Jennie E. & Ann Senghas
    2007 Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. InPamela M. Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 279–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198850.279
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198850.279 [Google Scholar]
  26. Quer, Josep
    2005 Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)XV1. 152–168. 10.3765/salt.v15i0.2923
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v15i0.2923 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2011 Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. InElke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 277–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110240085.277
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085.277 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2018 On categorizing types of role shift in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics441. 277–282. 10.1515/tl‑2018‑0020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
  29. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    (eds.) 2017 SignGram blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton (open access atwww.degruyter.com). 10.1515/9781501511806
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ross, John Robert
    1970 On declarative sentences. InRoderic A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–277. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schlenker, Philippe
    2003 A plea for monsters. Linguistics & Philosophy261. 29–120. 10.1023/A:1022225203544
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225203544 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2017 Super monsters I: Attitude and action role shift in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics101 (Article 9).
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sells, Peter
    1987 Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry18(3). 445–479.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Speas, Margaret
    2004 Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua1141. 255–276. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(03)00030‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Speas, Margaret & Carol Tenny
    2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. InAnna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar: Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  37. Stalnaker, Robert
    1999 Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198237073.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237073.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Steinbach, Markus
    2021 Role shift: Theoretical perspectives. InJosep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 351–377. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315754499‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754499-16 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sudo, Yasutada
    2012 On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999 The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wechsler, Stephen
    2010 What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language86(2). 332–365. 10.1353/lan.0.0220
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0220 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zucchi, Sandro
    2004 Monsters in the visual mode?Manuscript, Università degli Studi di Milano.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
Loading
Syntax and semantics of Role Shift in Japanese Sign Language
Sign Language & Linguistics 27, 209 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): duality of semantics; event; indexical shift; Point-of-View; Role Shift

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error