1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Volume 28, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper presents the first corpus-driven linguistic description of South African Sign Language (SASL) and the first exploration of the structure of simple declarative clauses in SASL. Using a corpus of 40 narratives of 25 signers from three South African provinces, the study finds that SASL exhibits a basic SVO clause structure, but that the most common clause structure is SV. The study also presents evidence of the existence of the null copula in SASL, and finds that SASL exhibits a high tolerance for argument ellipsis. With the exception of their generalisations in terms of locative clauses, the study finds that Napoli and Sutton-Spence’s (2014) generalisations regarding sign language syntax hold true for naturalistic narrative discourse in SASL. Finally, the study supports the claim that SASL is a single sign language in terms of its syntactic patterns, despite regional lexical variation.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
2025-03-18
2026-05-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarons, Debra
    1994 Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. Boston, MA: Boston University+++PhD thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aze, Trish & Richard Aze
    1973 Parengi texts. InRonald Trail (ed.), Patterns in clause, sentence, and discourse in selected languages of India and Nepal (part 3) [SIL Publications in Linguistics41(3)], 213–362.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Mona
    1993 Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. InMona Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 233–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.64.15bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.15bak [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergman, Brita & Lars Wallin
    1985 Sentence structure in Swedish Sign Language. InWilliam Stokoe & Virginia Volterra (eds.), SLR ’83: Proceedings of the III. International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Rome, June 1983, 217–225. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Börstell, Carl, Mats Wirén, Johanna Mesch & Moa Gärdenfors
    2016 Towards an annotation of syntactic structure in the Swedish Sign Language Corpus. InLREC Proceedings 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
    2006 Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory241. 945–975. 10.1007/s11049‑006‑9001‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9001-x [Google Scholar]
  7. Coerts, Jane
    1994 Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands. InMary Brennan & Graham Turner (eds.), Word-order issues in sign language, 47–72. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Costello, Brendan
    2016 Language and modality: effects of the use of space in the agreement system of lengua de signos española (Spanish Sign Language). Amsterdam: University of AmsterdamPhD dissertation. 10.1075/sll.19.2.06cos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.06cos [Google Scholar]
  9. Crasborn, Onno
    2007 How to recognise a sentence when you see one. Sign Language & Linguistics10(2). 103–111. 10.1075/sll.10.2.03cra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.03cra [Google Scholar]
  10. Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
    2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. InOnno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: construction and exploitation of sign language corpora (LREC2008), 39–43. Paris: ELRA. 〈https://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/lrec/pub/08.html〉.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Langhe, Olivier, Pierre Guitteny, Henri Portine & Christian Retoré
    2004 A propos des structures OSV en langue des signes française. Silexicales41. 115–130. www.labri.fr/perso/retore/ARTICLES/OSV.rtf.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Emmorey, Karen
    (ed.) 2003 Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410607447
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607447 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fischer, Susan
    1975 Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. InCharles Li (ed.), Word order and word order change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014 Constituent order in sign languages. 言語研究 (Gengo Kenkyu) 1461. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fischer, Susan & Wynne Janis
    1990 Verb sandwiches in ASL. InSiegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends in European sign language research: proceedings of the 3rd European congress on sign language research, Hamburg, 1989, 279–294. Hamburg: Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    2003 The resilience of language: what gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, Matthew, Rachel Mayberry & Victor Ferreira
    2013 Cognitive constraints on constituent order: Evidence from elicited pantomime. Cognition1291. 1–17. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hickmann, Maya
    2003 Children’s discourse: person, space, and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Huddlestone, Kate
    2021 Negation and polar question-answer clauses in South African Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics24(1). 63–86. 10.1075/sll.19014.hud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19014.hud [Google Scholar]
  20. Jantunen, Tommi
    2008 Fixed and free: order of the verbal predicate and its core arguments in declarative transitive clauses in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics211. 83–123. www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2008/Jantunen_NETTIVERSIO.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Schaffer
    2001 The construal of events: passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies1(3). 281–310. 10.1353/sls.2001.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2001.0009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson
    2007 “Real data are messy”: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. InPamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: comparative studies on sign language structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198850.163
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198850.163 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2012 Word order in Russian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies121. 414–445. 10.1353/sls.2012.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2012.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2018 Basic argument structure in Russian Sign Language. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics3(1). 1161.1–39. 10.5334/gjgl.494
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.494 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2019 Information structure in sign languages: evidence from Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501510045
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510045 [Google Scholar]
  26. Langus, Alan & Marina Nespor
    2010 Cognitive systems struggling for word order. Cognitive Psychology601. 291–318. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Liddell, Scott
    1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112418260
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112418260 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1990 Four functions of a locus: reexamining the structure of space in ASL. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lillo-Martin, Diane
    1986 Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory41. 415–444. 10.1007/BF00134469
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134469 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lourenço, Guilherme & Ronice Müller de Quadros
    2020 The syntactic structure of the clause in Brazilian Sign Language. InRonice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Brazilian Sign Language studies, 131–154. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501507878‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507878-007 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lucas, Ceil & Clayton Valli
    1992 Language contact in the American Deaf community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004653337
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653337 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayer, Mercer
    1969 Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McKee, Rachel & Graeme Kennedy
    2005 New Zealand Sign Language. InAlan Bell, Ray Harlow & Donna Starks (eds.), Languages of New Zealand, 271–297. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics431. 531–563. 10.1017/S0022226707004768
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
  36. Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Emerging sign languages. InMarc Marschark & Patricia Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, Vol.21, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390032.013.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390032.013.0018 [Google Scholar]
  37. Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Carl Börstell, So-One Hwang, Deniz Ilkbasaran, Itamar Kastner, Ryan Lepic, Adi Lifshitz Ben-Basat, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
    2017 The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition1581. 189–207. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  38. Milković, Marina, Sandra Bradarić-Jončić & Ronnie Wilbur
    2006 Word order in Croatian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics9(1/2). 169–206. 10.1075/sll.9.1.10mil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.9.1.10mil [Google Scholar]
  39. Mithun, Marianne
    1988 The grammaticalisation of coordination. InJohn Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 331–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.13mit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.13mit [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgan, Hope
    2020 Argument structure and the role of body and space in Kenyan Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics23(1/2). 38–72. 10.1075/sll.00043.mor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00043.mor [Google Scholar]
  41. Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
    2014 Order of the main constituents of sign languages: Implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 2014(5). 376.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton Spence
    2021 Clause-initial Vs in sign languages: Scene-setters. InVera Lee-Schoenfeld & Dennis Ott (eds.), Parameters of predicate fronting, 198–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197545553.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197545553.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  43. Napoli, Donna Jo, Rachel Sutton Spence & Ronice Müller de Quadros
    2017 Influence of predicate sense on word order in sign languages: intensional and extensional verbs. Language (2017). 641–670. 10.1353/lan.2017.0039
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0039 [Google Scholar]
  44. Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee
    2000 The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Newmeyer, Frederick
    2000 On the reconstruction of ‘proto-world’ word order. InChris Knight, Michael Studdert-Kennedy & James Hurford (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: social function and the origins of linguistic form, 372–388. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511606441.022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606441.022 [Google Scholar]
  46. Novogrodsky, Rama, Rose Stamp & Sabrin Shaban-Rabah
    2023 Word order in simple sentences of tri-lingual tri-modal deaf students. Sign Language & Linguistics26(1). 37–63. 10.1075/sll.22002.nov
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.22002.nov [Google Scholar]
  47. Oomen, Marloes
    2017 Iconicity in argument structure: Psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics20(1). 55–108. 10.1075/sll.20.1.03oom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.03oom [Google Scholar]
  48. Oomen, Marloes & Vadim Kimmelman
    2019 Body anchored verbs and argument omission in sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1). 42.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Padden, Carol
    1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ponelis, Friedrich A.
    1979 Afrikaanse sintaksis [Afrikaans syntax]. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Proske, Sina
    2022 The impact of verb type on word order in German Sign Language. Göttingen: University of GöttingenPhD thesis. https://ediss.uni-goettingen.de/handle/11858/14206
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Quadros, Ronice Müller de
    2003 Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. InAnne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 141–162. Hamburg: Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Quadros, Ronice Müller de & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2010 Clause structure. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 225–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.012 [Google Scholar]
  55. Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Jair Barbosa da Silva & Roderigo Nogueira Machado
    2023 A corpus-based analysis of coordinate structures in Libras. InElla Wehrmeyer (ed.), Advances in sign language corpus linguistics, 123–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.108.05qua
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.05qua [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2005 The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proclamations of the National Academy of Science USA1021. 2661–2665. 10.1073/pnas.0405448102
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102 [Google Scholar]
  57. So, Wing-Chee, Marie Coppola, Vincent Licciardello & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2005 The seeds of spatial grammar in the manual modality. Cognitive Science291. 1029–1043. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_38
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_38 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sze, Felix
    2003 Word order of Hong Kong Sign Language. InAnne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 163–192. Hamburg: Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Van Gelderen, Elly
    2011 The linguistic cycle: language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Herreweghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen
    2012 Verbal predicates in Flemish Sign Language (VGT) and South African Sign Language (SASL). InMaarleen van Peteghem, Peter Lauwers & Els Tobback (eds.), Le verbe en verve: réflexions sur la syntaxe et la sémantique verbales, 401–420. Ghent: Academia Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Vermeerbergen, Myriam
    1996 rood kool tien persoon in. Morfosyntactische aspecten van gebarentaal. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit BrusselPhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Philemon Akach & Emily Matabane
    2007 Constituent order in Flemish Sign Language and South African Sign Language. A cross-linguistic study. Sign Language & Linguistics10(1). 25–54. 10.1075/sll.10.1.04ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.1.04ver [Google Scholar]
  63. Volterra, Virginia, Alessandro Laudanna, Serena Corazza, Elena Radutsky & Francesco Natale
    1984 Italian Sign Language: The order of elements in the declarative sentence. InFilip Loncke, Penny Boyes-Braem & Yvan Lebrun (eds.), Recent research on European sign languages, 19–48. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Voynova, E. I., V. M. Matveeva & G. N. Aver’janova
    1978 Ychebnik russkogo jazyka dlja inostrannykh studentov-filologov [Textbook of Russian language for foreign philological students]. Moscow: Russkiy Jazyk.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Wehrmeyer, Ella
    2015a An annotation system for signed language interpreting corpora. Hermeneus171. 279–317.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2015b Comprehension of television news signed language interpreters: A South African perspective. Interpreting17(2). 195–225. 10.1075/intp.17.2.03weh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.17.2.03weh [Google Scholar]
  67. 2019a A corpus for signed language interpreting research. Interpreting21(1). 62–90. 10.1075/intp.00020.weh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00020.weh [Google Scholar]
  68. 2019b Linguistic interference in interpreting from English to South African Sign Language. InRay Hickey (ed.), English in multilingual South Africa, 371–393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108340892.018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108340892.018 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2023 Verb classes in South African Sign Language. InElla Wehrmeyer (ed.), Advances in sign language corpus linguistics, 155–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.108.06weh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.06weh [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
Loading
Structure of simple declarative clauses in South African Sign Language
Sign Language & Linguistics 28, 104 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24001.weh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): copula constructions; corpus linguistics; declarative clauses; information structure; South African Sign Language; South African Sign Language corpus

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error