1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Action depiction in gestures and signs
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The relation between gestures and signs is highly debated both in gestures and sign language studies. Addressing the common symbolic ground from which both gestures and signs arise could improve our general knowledge about the body’s role in meaning construction and in shaping communication. To effectively compare how signers and speakers employ their bodies to convey meanings, we investigated how actions are depicted in gestures and signs by collecting and comparing data from 15 hearing Italian speakers and 10 Deaf LIS signers. Specifically, the present study addresses the use of representational strategies (i.e., own body, hand-as-hand, hand-as-object) in co-speech gestures and signs in different action domains (i.e., to break, to take, to attach, to open, to turn). We aim to look at how different action domains affect the distribution of representational strategies in gestures and signs. Our results showed that action domains influenced the use of representational strategies similarly among signers and speakers, suggesting that action events are conceptualized alike. Nevertheless, there are qualitative differences in action depiction, discussed throughout the paper, as well as in the combination of different representational strategies, used less by Italian speakers, compared to LIS signers.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
2025-11-11
2025-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armstrong, David F.
    1999 Original signs: Gesture, sign, and the sources of language. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe & Sherman Wilcox
    1995 Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620911
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620911 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonsignori, Chiara
    2024 Describing actions: the semantic role of gestures. Rivista di psicolinguistica applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, XXIV edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2025 Tra segnato e parlato: appunti per una semiotica comparativa (Collana Linguistica e Linguistiche 13). Quarto Inferiore, Bologna: Pàtron editore.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra
    2015 Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1111/tops.12123
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12123 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cacioli, Caterina & Paola Vernillo
    2023 How did you break that? Semantic boundaries of Italian and English action verbs encoding breaking events. Languages in Contrast(). –. 10.1075/lic.22004.cac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.22004.cac [Google Scholar]
  7. Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
    2022 Signed languages: A triangular semiotic dimension. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911 [Google Scholar]
  8. Capirci, Olga, Annarita Contaldo, Maria Cristina Caselli & Virginia Volterra
    2005 From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.5.1‑2.12cap
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1-2.12cap [Google Scholar]
  9. Capirci, Olga, Morgana Proietti & Virginia Volterra
    2022 Searching for the roots of signs in children’s early gestures. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.20030.cap
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20030.cap [Google Scholar]
  10. Caselli, Maria Cristina, Simonetta Maragna, Laura Rampelli Pagliari & Virginia Volterra
    1994 Linguaggio e sordità: parole e segni per l’educazione dei sordi. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chu, Mingyuan, Antje Meyer, Lucy Foulkes & Sotaro Kita
    2014 Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General(). –. 10.1037/a0033861
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033861 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, Jacob
    1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement(). –. 10.1177/001316446002000104
     https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cominetti, Federica & Alessandro Panunzi
    2020 Just a matter of manner? Modeling action verb semantics in an inter-linguistic perspective. Testi e linguaggi. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuxac, Christian & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2007 Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. InElena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea & Raffaele Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.13140/RG.2.1.4884.8483
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4884.8483 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao, Helena Hong
    2001 The physical foundation of the patterning of physical action verbs: A study of Chinese verbs (Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund). Vol.. Lund: Lund University.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari
    2017 Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. –. 10.1017/S0140525X15001247
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hostetter, Autumn B. & Martha W. Alibali
    2008 Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review(). –. 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
     https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2019 Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review(). –. 10.3758/s13423‑018‑1548‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1548-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kendon, Adam
    2002 Historical Observations on the Relationship Between Research on Sign Languages and Language Origins Theory. InDavid Armstrong, Michel A. Karchmar & John Vickerey Va Cleve (eds.), The Study of Signed Languages: Essays in Honor of William C. Stokoe, –. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(). . 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily action. InKeith Allan (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics, –. London: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences(). 10.1017/S0140525X15002940
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002940 [Google Scholar]
  24. Landis, J. Richard & Gary G. Koch
    1977 The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics(). –. 10.2307/2529310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  25. Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Miriam van Staden & James S. Boster
    2007 The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/COG.2007.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Marentette, Paula, Paola Pettenati, Arianna Bello & Virginia Volterra
    2016 Gesture and symbolic representation in Italian and English-speaking Canadian 2-Year-Olds. Child Development(). –. 10.1111/cdev.12523
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12523 [Google Scholar]
  27. Moneglia, Massimo
    2014 The variation of action verbs in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora. InTommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds.), Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies, –. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.61.06mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.06mon [Google Scholar]
  28. Moneglia, Massimo & Alessandro Panunzi
    2007 Action predicates and the ontology of action across spoken language corpora. The basic issue of the SEMACT project. InManuel Alcántara & Thierry Declerck (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Semantic Representation of Spoken Language, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2010 Verbi generali nei corpora di parlato. InEmanuela Cresti & Iørn Korzen (eds.), Cognition and identity. Extensions of the endocentric/exocentric language typology, –. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller, Cornelia
    2013 Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depcition. InCornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig & David McNeill (eds.), Body — language — communication: an international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018 Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations?Frontiers in Psychology(). –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nicoladis, Elena & Helena Hong Gao
    2022 How bilinguals refer to Mandarin throwing actions in English. International Journal of Bilingualism(). –. 10.1177/13670069211022853
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211022853 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ortega, Gerardo & Asli Özyürek
    2020 Types of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across cultures. Language and Cognition(). –. 10.1017/langcog.2019.28
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.28 [Google Scholar]
  34. Özer, Demet & Tilbe Göksun
    2020 Gesture use and processing: A review on individual differences in cognitive resources. Frontiers in Psychology(). 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573555
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573555 [Google Scholar]
  35. Padden, Carol A., So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers
    2015 Tools for Language: Patterned Iconicity in Sign Language Nouns and Verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1111/tops.12121
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
  36. Padden, Carol A., Irit Meir, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic, Sharon Seegers & Tory Sampson
    2013 Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
  37. Panunzi, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Lorenzo Gregori, Stefano Jacoviello, Monica Monachini, Massimo Moneglia, Valeria Quochi & Irene Russo
    2014 Translating Action Verbs using a Dictionary of Images: the IMAGACT Ontology. InAndrea Abel, Chiara Vettori & Natascia Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Conference: The User in Focus, –. Bolzano: EURAC research.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Panunzi, Alessandro & Massino Moneglia
    2004 La variazione semantica del verbo nel lessico dei corpora di Lablita. InFederico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds.), Il parlato italiano. Atti del Convegno nazionale di Napoli, 13–15 febbraio 2003. D’Aura Edizioni.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Perniss, Pamela, Asli Özyürek & Gary Morgan
    2015 The influence of the visual modality on language structure and conventionalization: Insights from sign language and gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1111/tops.12127
     https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12127 [Google Scholar]
  40. Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology(). 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pietrandrea, Paola
    2002 Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies(). –. 10.1353/sls.2002.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2002.0012 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schultze-Berndt, Eva
    2008 What do ‘do’ verbs do? The semantic diversity of generalised action verbs. InElisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopetas, Yong-Min Shin, Nishina Yoko, & Johannes Helmbrecht (eds.), Studies on grammaticalization, vol., –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211764.3.185
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211764.3.185 [Google Scholar]
  43. Slonimska, Anita, Asli Özyürek & Olga Capirci
    2020 The role of iconicity and simultaneity for efficient communication: The case of Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognition. . 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2022 Simultaneity as an emergent property of efficient communication in language: A comparison of silent gesture and sign language. Cognitive Science(). e13133. 10.1111/cogs.13133
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13133 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sparaci, Laura & Virginia Volterra
    2017 Hands shaping communication: From gestures to signs. InMarta Bertolaso & Nicola Di Stefano (eds.), The hand: Perception, cognition, action, –. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑66881‑9_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66881-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pasquale Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
    2020 The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0131
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0131 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vernillo, Paola
    2021 Grounding abstract concepts in action: Semantic analysis of four Italian action verbs encoding force events. InLucas Bechberger, Kai-Uwe Kühnberger & Mingya Liu (eds.), Concepts in Action, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑69823‑2_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69823-2_8 [Google Scholar]
  48. Volterra, Virginia, Olga Capirci, Maria Cristina Caselli, Pasquale Rinaldi & Laura Sparaci
    2017 Developmental evidence for continuity from action to gesture to sign/word. Language, Interaction and Acquisition(). –. 10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.02vol [Google Scholar]
  49. Volterra, Virginia, Olga Capirci, Pasquale Rinaldi & Laura Sparaci
    2018 From action to spoken and signed language through gesture. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems(). –. 10.1075/is.17027.vol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17027.vol [Google Scholar]
  50. Volterra, Virginia, Maria Roccaforte, Alessio Di Renzo & Sabina Fontana
    2022 Italian Sign Language from a cognitive and socio-semiotic perspective: Implications for a general language theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.9 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilcox, Sherman
    2002 William C. Stokoe and the gestural theory of language origins. InDavid F. Armstrong, Michael A. Karchmer & John Vickrey Van Cleve (eds.), The study of signed languages: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe, –. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 2004a Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  53. 2004b Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cogl.2004.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
Loading
Action depiction in gestures and signs
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24003.bon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: depicting constructions ; LIS ; comparative semiotics ; action verbs ; gestures ; iconicity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error