oa Action bias in describing object locations by signing children

References

1. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin Bolker & Steve Walker
   2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software(). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
2. Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
   2004 Where did all the arguments go? Argument changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑003‑4698‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2 [Google Scholar]
3. Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra
   2015 Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1111/tops.12123
   https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12123 [Google Scholar]
4. Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Ashley Jung & Susan Goldin-Meadow
   2013 Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language: Evidence from handshape. Language Learning and Development(). –. 10.1080/15475441.2012.679540
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2012.679540 [Google Scholar]
5. Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
   2022 Signed languages: A triangular semiotic dimension. Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911 [Google Scholar]
6. Caselli, Naomi & Jennie Pyers
   2017 The road to language learning is not entirely iconic: Iconicity, neighborhood density, and frequency facilitate acquisition of sign language. Psychological Science. –. 10.1177/0956797617700498
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700498 [Google Scholar]
7. Caselli, Naomi & Jennie Pyers
   2019 Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cuxac, Christian
   2003 Une langue moins marquée comme analyseur langagier: l’exemple de la LSF. Nouvelle Revue de l’AIS. –.
   [Google Scholar]
9. de Beuzeville, Louise
   2006 Visual and linguistic representation in the acquisition of depicting verbs: a study of native signing deaf children of Auslan. Sydney: University of SydneyPhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
10. de Lint, Vanja
    2010 Argument structure in classifier constructions in ASL: an experimental approach. Utrecht: University of UtrechtMaster’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Emmorey, Karen
    2014 Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences. . 10.1098/rstb.2013.0301
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0301 [Google Scholar]
12. Emmorey, Karen
    (ed.) 2003 Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410607447
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607447 [Google Scholar]
13. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    2003 How composite is a fall? Adult’s and children’s descriptions of different types of falls in Danish Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, –. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hou, Lynn
    2018 Iconic patterns in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language. Sign Language Studies(). –. 10.1353/sls.2018.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2018.0017 [Google Scholar]
15. Hwang, So-one, Nozomi Tomita, Hope Morgan, Rabia Ergin, Deniz İlkbaşaran, Sharon Seegers, Ryan Lepic & Carol Padden
    2017 Of the body and the hands: Patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition(). –. 10.1017/langcog.2016.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.28 [Google Scholar]
16. Jaeger, Florian
    2008 Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or Not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language(). –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
17. İlkbaşaran, Deniz
    2013 Communicative practices of deaf people in Turkey and the sociolinguistics of Turkish Sign Language. InEngin Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, –. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kantor, Rebecca
    1980 The acquisition of classifiers in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies. –. 10.1353/sls.1980.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1980.0000 [Google Scholar]
19. Kegl, Judy
    1990 Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, –. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kimmelman, Vadim, Anna Klezovich & George Moroz
    2018 IPSL: A database of iconicity patterns in sign languages. Creation and use. InNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Koiti Hasida, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Helene Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis & Takenobu Tokunaga (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kimmelman, Vadim, Vanja de Lint, Connie De Vos, Marloes Oomen, Roland Pfau, Lianne Vink & Enoch O. Aboh
    2019 Argument structure of classifier predicates: Canonical and non-canonical mappings in four sign languages. Open Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/opli‑2019‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0018 [Google Scholar]
22. Kimmelman, Vadim, Roland Pfau & Enoch O. Aboh
    2020 Argument structure of classifier predicates in Russian Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑019‑09448‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09448-9 [Google Scholar]
23. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva
    2017 The contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary. Ankara: The Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy. tidsozluk.net
25. Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Adrianne Cheek & Christopher Moreland
    2008 The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants?Language Learning and Development(). –. 10.1080/15475440701377618
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701377618 [Google Scholar]
26. Miles, Mike
    2000 Signing in the Seraglio: mutes, dwarfs and jestures at the Ottoman Court 1500–1700. Disability & Society. –. 10.1080/09687590025801
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025801 [Google Scholar]
27. Newport, Elissa & Richard Meier
    1985 Acquisition of American Sign Language. InDan Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Newport, Elissa & Ted Supalla
    1980 The structuring of language: clues from the acquisition of signed and spoken language. InUrsula Bellugi & Michael Studdert-Kennedy (eds.), Signed and spoken language: biological constraints on linguistic form, –. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nyst, Viktoria
    2007 A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Amsterdam: University of AmsterdamPhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nyst, Viktoria
    2016 Size and shape depictions in the manual modality: A taxonomy of iconic devices in Adamorobe Sign Language. Semiotica. –. 10.1515/sem‑2016‑0049
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0049 [Google Scholar]
31. Nyst, Viktoria
    2018 Cross-linguistic variation in space-based distance for size depiction in the lexicons of six sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.00024.nys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00024.nys [Google Scholar]
32. Nyst, Viktoria., Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa Van Der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller
    2022 Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: Towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2021‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-0026 [Google Scholar]
33. Orlansky, Michael & John Bonvillian
    1984 The role of iconicity in early sign language acquisition. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders. –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ortega, Gerardo, Beyza Sümer & Aslı Özyürek
    2017 Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology(). –. 10.1037/dev0000161
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000161 [Google Scholar]
35. Padden, Carol, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers
    2015 Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science. –. 10.1111/tops.12121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
36. Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic, Sharon Seegers & Tory Sampson
    2013 Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture(). –. 10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.03pad [Google Scholar]
37. Perniss, Pamela
    2007 Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Perniss, Pamela & Aslı Özyürek
    2008 Representations of action, motion and location in sign space: A comparison of German (DGS) and Turkish (TİD) sign language narratives. InJosep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: selected papers from TISLR 8, –. Seedorf: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Perniss, Pamela, Robin Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227 [Google Scholar]
40. Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2014 The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biology.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pettenati, Paola, Kazuki Sekine, Elena Congestrì & Virginia Volterra
    2012 A comparative study on representational gestures in Italian and Japanese children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. –. 10.1007/s10919‑011‑0127‑0.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0127-0 [Google Scholar]
42. Powell, Michael
    2009 The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
44. Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    2006 Iconicity and space in French Sign Language. InMaya Hickmann & Stephane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.14sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.14sal [Google Scholar]
45. Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    2007 Simultaneity in French Sign Language discourse. InMyriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.281.05sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.281.05sal [Google Scholar]
46. Schick, Brenda
    1990 The effects of morphosyntactic structures on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, –. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sevgi, Hande & Kadir Gökgöz
    2023 Classifiers, argument expression, and age of acquisition effects in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.21006.sev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.21006.sev [Google Scholar]
48. Slobin, Dan I., Nini Hoiting, Marlon Kuntze, Reyna Lindert, Amy Weinberg, Jennie Pyers, Michelle Anthony, Yael Biederman & Helen Thumann
    2003 A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. InKaren Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages, –. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stefanini, Silvia, Arianna Bello, Maria Christina Caselli, Jana Iverson & Virginia Volterra
    2009 Co-speech gestures in a naming task: Developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes(). –. 10.1080/01690960802187755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802187755 [Google Scholar]
50. Supalla, Ted
    1982 Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of CaliforniaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sümer, Beyza
    2015 Acquisition of spatial language by signing and speaking children: a comparison of Turkish Sign Language (TID) and Turkish. Nijmegen: Radboud UniversityPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sümer, Beyza, Clara Grabitz & Aylin Küntay
    2017 Early produced signs are iconic: Evidence from Turkish Sign Language. InGlenn Gunzelmann, Andrew Howes, Thora Tenbrink & Eddy Davelaar (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, –. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sümer, Beyza & Aslı Özyürek
    2020 No effects of modality in development of locative expressions of space in signing and speaking children. Journal of Child Language(). –. 10.1017/S0305000919000928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000928 [Google Scholar]
54. Tang, Gladys, Felix Sze & Scholastica Lam
    2007 Acquisition of simultaneous constructions by deaf children of Hong Kong Sign Language. InMyriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.281.13tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.281.13tan [Google Scholar]
55. Taub, Sarah
    2001 Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
56. Thompson, Robin, David Vinson, Bencie Woll & Gabriealla Vigliocco
    2012 The road to language learning is iconic: Evidence from British Sign Language. Psychological Science(). –. 10.1177/0956797612459763
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459763 [Google Scholar]
57. Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pascal Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
    2020 The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0131 [Google Scholar]
58. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes
    2006 ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of LREC 2006. Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. www.lrecconf.org/proceedings/lrec2006
59. Yu, Chen, Linda Smith & Alfredo Pereira
    2008 Grounding word learning in multimodal sensorimotor interaction. InBrenda Love, Ken McRae & Vladimir Sloutsky (eds.), Proceeding of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, –. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Zwitserlood, Inge
    2003 Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Utrecht: University of UtrechtPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zwitserlood, Inge
    2012 Classifiers. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: an international handbook, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.158
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.158 [Google Scholar]