Discourse genres in French Sign Language

References

1. Adam, Jean-Michel
   2001 Les textes: types et prototypes. Paris: Nathan Université.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Belissen, Valentin, Annelies Braffort & Michèle Gouiffès
   2020 Experimenting the automatic recognition of non-conventionalized units in sign language. Algorithms. –. 10.3390/a13120310
   https://doi.org/10.3390/a13120310 [Google Scholar]
3. Benveniste, Emile
   1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, Douglas
   1989 A typology of English texts, Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas
   1991 Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
   2019 Register, genre, and style (2nd edition) New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
7. Bouvet, Danielle
   1996 Approche polyphonique d’un récit produit en Langue des Signes Française. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
   2022 Signed languages: A triangular semiotic dimension. Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802911 [Google Scholar]
9. Cuxac, Christian
   1985 Esquisse d’une typologie des langues des signes. InChristian Cuxac (ed.), Proceedings of the workshop ‘Autour de la Langue des Signes’, –. Paris: Université Paris 5.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cuxac, Christian
    1999 The expression of spatial relations and the spatialization of semantic relations in French Sign Language. InCatherine Fuchs & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.3.11cux
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.3.11cux [Google Scholar]
11. Cuxac, Christian
    2000 La Langue des Signes Française. Les voies de l’iconicité. Faits de langue 15–16, Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cuxac, Christian, Annelies Braffort, Annick Choisier, Christophe Collet, Patrice Dalle, Ivani Fusellier, Gwenaëlle Jirou, Fanch Lejeune, Boris Lenseigne, Nathalie Monteillard, Annie Risler & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2015 Corpus LS-Colin sur plusieurs genres discursifs. https://cocoon.huma-num.fr/exist/crdo/search2.xql?lang=fr&keyword=LSF
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cuxac, Christian & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2007 Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly Iconic Structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. InElena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea & Raffaele Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ELAN (Version 7.0) [Computer software]
    ELAN (Version 7.0) [Computer software] 2025 Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Retrieved fromhttps://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
15. Garcia, Brigitte, Marie-Thérèse L’Huillier & Coralie Vincent
    2022 Corpus Creagest, dialogues en LSF d’adultes sourds. Projet ANR. https://www.ortolang.fr/market/corpora/ortolang-000926
    [Google Scholar]
16. Garcia, Brigitte & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2014 Reference resolution in French Sign Language (LSF). InPatricia Cabredo Hofherr & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004261440_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261440_012 [Google Scholar]
17. Garcia, Brigitte & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2020 Contribution of the semiological approach to deixis–anaphora in sign language: The key role of eye-gaze. Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583763
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583763 [Google Scholar]
18. Gonzalez, Stéphane, Frédéric Amauger, Fabrice Bertin, Paul Tsopgni & Anne Vanbrugghe
    2013 Langue des signes française. Niveau A1. Paris: Editions Belin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heiden, Serge
    2010 The TXM platform: Building open-source textual analysis software compatible with the TEI encoding scheme. In24th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation(). –. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hickmann, Maya
    2003 Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hodge, Gabrielle & Kearsy Cormier
    2019 Reported speech as enactment. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0008 [Google Scholar]
22. Kaczmarek, Marion
    2022 Spécification d’un logiciel de traduction assistée par ordinateur à destination des langues signées. Saclay: Université Paris-Saclay PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lafon, Pierre
    1980 Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus. Sociétés. –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
25. Martinod, Emmanuella, Brigitte Garcia & Ivani Fusellier
    2018 A typological perspective on the meaningful handshapes in the emerging sign languages on Marajó Island (Brazil). InOlivier Le Guen, Josefina Safar & Marie Coppola (eds.), Emerging sign languages in South America, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Metzger, Melanie
    1995 Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, –. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Meurant, Laurence & Aurélie Sinte
    2016 La reformulation en langue des signes de Belgique francophone (LSFB). Analyse dans un corpus de trois types de discours: narration, explication et conversation. L’Information grammaticale. –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Millet, Agnès
    2019 Grammaire descriptive de la langue des signes française. Dynamiques iconiques et linguistique générale. Grenoble: UGA Editions. 10.4000/books.ugaeditions.15959
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ugaeditions.15959 [Google Scholar]
29. Rastier, François & Bénédicte Pincemin
    1999 Des genres à l’intertexte. Cahiers de praxématique. –. 10.4000/praxematique.1974
    https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.1974 [Google Scholar]
30. Risler, Annie
    2016 Parler de soi, parler des autres en langue des signes française. Autopointage et prise de rôle. L’Information grammaticale. –.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Russo, Tomasso
    2004 Iconicity and productivity in sign language discourse: An analysis of three LIS discourse registers. Sign Language Studies. –. 10.1353/sls.2004.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0006 [Google Scholar]
32. Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    2003 Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. Saint-Denis: Université Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    2014 Compositionnalité des unités sémantiques en langues des signes. Perspectives typologique et développementale. Saint-Denis: Université Paris 8 Habilitation dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sallandre, Marie-Anne, Antonio Balvet, Geoffrey Besnard & Brigitte Garcia
    2019 Etude exploratoire de la fréquence des catégories linguistiques dans quatre genres discursifs en LSF. LIDIL. –. 10.4000/lidil.7136
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.7136 [Google Scholar]
35. Sallandre, Marie-Anne & Brigitte Garcia
    2023 Overview of and epistemological conditions for building and using LSF corpora. InElla Wehrmeyer (ed.), Advances in sign language corpus linguistics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.108.10sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.10sal [Google Scholar]
36. Swales, John
    1990 Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Takkinen, Ritva, Jarkko Keränen & Juhana Salonen
    2018 Depicting signs and different text genres: Preliminary observations in the corpus of Finnish Sign Language. InBono Mayumi, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie A. Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch & Osugi Yutaka (eds.), Proceedings of the LREC2018 8th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, –. Miyazaki, Japan. lrec-conf.org/workshops/lrec2018/W1/pdf/18038_W1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vermeerbergen, Myriam
    2006 Past and current trends in sign language research. Language & Communication(). –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.10.004 [Google Scholar]
39. Volterra, Virginia, Maria Roccaforte, Alessio Di Renzo & Sabina Fontana
    2022 Italian Sign Language from a cognitive and socio-semiotic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.9 [Google Scholar]