1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Sign Language & Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Intersubjective modulation of exophoric demonstratives in ASL
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Demonstratives are essential for coordinating joint attention during discourse. In contrast to spoken languages that typically distribute the work of establishing and maintaining joint attention across two or more demonstratives such as and in English, American Sign Language (ASL) does not have contrasting forms. ASL relies almost exclusively on pointing signs for the grammatical functions of demonstratives. This study investigates whether exophoric demonstrative points are modulated with nonmanual markers (NMMs) in response to different contexts of use. 455 demonstrative points were elicited in a puzzle completion task completed by ten ASL signers. Conditional inference trees were used to evaluate the effects of distance, intersubjective alignment and referent specificity on the NMMs produced with the demonstrative points. The results indicate that signers signal increasing distance from their body with an arc movement of the hand, as well as head and body leans, whereas NMMs on the face were associated with intersubjective functions. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no NMMs associated with the need for greater specificity of demonstrative points when multiple potential referents were in the field of view.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
2025-12-02
2025-12-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan
    1985 Deixis. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bahan, Benjamin, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin & Carol Neidle
    1995 Convergent evidence for the structure of determiner phrases in American Sign Language. InLeslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America. Volume 2: Syntax II & semantics/pragmatics, –. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan T. Gries & Joybrato Mukherjee
    2014 The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English(). –. 10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickford, J. Albert & Kathy Fraychineaud
    2008 Mouth morphemes in ASL: A closer look. InRonice M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. Forty five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006, –. Petropolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdsong, David, Libby M. Gertken & Mark Amengual
    2012, January20. Bilingual language profile: an easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. (https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/) (Accessed2024-1-23)
  6. Chee, Melvatha L. & Tamara Yazzie
    2023 Child-produced demonstratives in Diné Bizaad. Paper presented at theWorkshop on American Indigenous Languages, Santa Barbara, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooperrider, Kensy
    2016 The co-organization of demonstratives and pointing gestures. Discourse Processes(). –. 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1094280
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1094280 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooperrider, Kensy & Kate Mesh
    2023 Pointing in gesture and sign. InAliyah Morgenstern & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Gesture in language: development across the lifespan, –. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll
    2013 Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch
    2008 Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.11.1.04cra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.11.1.04cra [Google Scholar]
  11. Dachkovsky, Svetlana
    2020 From a demonstrative to a relative clause marker: Grammaticalization of pointing signs in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.00047.dac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00047.dac [Google Scholar]
  12. Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
    2009 Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech(). –. 10.1177/0023830909103175
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103175 [Google Scholar]
  13. Diessel, Holger
    1999 Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2006 Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 Distance contrasts in demonstratives (v2020.4). InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Zenodo. Retrieved fromwals.info/chapter/41
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    2003 From pointing to reference and predication: Orientation in Danish Sign Language. InSotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, –. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fenlon, Jordan, Kensy Cooperrider, Jon Keane, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2019 Comparing sign language and gesture: Insights from pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(). 10.5334/gjgl.499
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.499 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hochgesang, Julie A., Onno Crasborn & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2025 ASL Signbank. New Haven, CT: Haskins Lab, Yale University. Retrieved fromhttps://aslsignbank.com
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffmeister, Robert
    1978 The development of demonstrative pronouns, locatives and personal pronouns in the acquisition of American Sign Language by deaf children of deaf parents. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis
    2006 Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics(). –. 10.1198/106186006X133933
     https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis
    2015 partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoza, Jack
    2008 Five nonmanual modifiers that mitigate requests and rejections in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies(). –. 10.1353/sls.2008.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2008.0006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Irani, Ava
    2019 On (in)definite expressions in American Sign Language. InAna Aguilar-Guevara, Julia Pozas Loyo & Violeta Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado (eds.), Definiteness across languages. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.3252018
     https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3252018 [Google Scholar]
  24. Janzen, Terry
    1999 The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.23.2.03jan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.2.03jan [Google Scholar]
  25. Koulidobrova, Elena & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2016 A ‘point’ of inquiry: The case of the (non-) pronominal ix in ASL. InPatrick Grosz & Pritty Patel-Grosz (eds.), The impact of pronominal form on interpretation, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614517016‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614517016-009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Landis, J. Richard & Gary G. Koch
    1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics(). . 10.2307/2529310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  27. Levshina, Natalia
    2020 Conditional inference trees and random forests. InMagali Paquot & Stefan T. Gries (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1_25
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25 [Google Scholar]
  28. Liddell, Scott K.
    1978 Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. InPatricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, –. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783112418260
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112418260 [Google Scholar]
  30. 1990 Four functions of a locus: Reexamining the structure of space in ASL. InCeil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, –. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  32. Manrique, Elizabeth & Nick J. Enfield
    2015 Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology. –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326 [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier, Richard P. & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2013 The points of language. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Morford, Jill P., Barbara Shaffer, Naomi Shin, Paul Twitchell & Bettie T. Petersen
    2019 An exploratory study of ASL demonstratives. Languages(). . 10.3390/languages4040080
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040080 [Google Scholar]
  35. Peeters, David, Zeynep Azar & Aslı Özyürek
    2014 The interplay between joint attention, physical proximity, and pointing gesture in demonstrative choice. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society–.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
    2021 A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review(). –. 10.3758/s13423‑020‑01822‑8
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01822-8 [Google Scholar]
  37. Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek
    2016 This and that revisited: A social and multimodal approach to spatial demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00222
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00222 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pfau, Roland
    2011 A point well taken. InGaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732548.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2006 Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag. Available atopus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2006/1088/
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Piwek, Paul, Robbert-Jan Beun & Anita Cremers
    2008 ‘Proximal’ and ‘distal’ in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics(). –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Puupponen, Anna
    2019 Towards understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(). 10.5334/gjgl.709
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.709 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rubio-Fernandez, Paula, Madeleine Long & Aslı Özyürek
    2026 Spatial and social cognition jointly determine multimodal demonstrative reference: Experimental evidence from Turkish and Spanish. Cognition. . 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106289
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106289 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shin, Naomi, Luis Hinojosa-Cantú, Barbara Shaffer & Jill P. Morford
    2020 Demonstratives as indicators of interactional focus: Spatial and social dimensions of Spanish esta and esa. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0068
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0068 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shin, Naomi & Sarah Lease
    2025 Conceptual transfer: The impact of addressee location on Spanish-English bilinguals’ nominal demonstratives. Acta Linguistica Academica(). –. 10.1556/2062.2024.00878
     https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2024.00878 [Google Scholar]
  46. Siyavoshi, Sara
    2019 Hands and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0130
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0130 [Google Scholar]
  47. Skilton, Amalia
    2021 Demonstratives and visibility: Data from Ticuna and implications for theories of deixis. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2021.0065
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0065 [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, Cheri, Ella Mae Lentz & Ken Mikos
    2008 Signing naturally: Student workbook, units 1–6. San Diego, California: DawnSignPress.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen
    2012 Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change(). –. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tankersley, Devin
    2018 Cross-modality learning and pronoun interpretation: A case study of Taiwan Sign Language. Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Twitchell, Paul
    2023 Deictic pointing and demonstrative usage in American Sign Language. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino
    2016 Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2007 Universal 20 and Taiwan Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/sll.10.1.05zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.1.05zha [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
Loading
Intersubjective modulation of exophoric demonstratives in ASL
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: demonstratives ; pointing ; nonmanual markers ; ASL ; intersubjectivity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error