1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X

Abstract

Aspectual verb modifications have hardly been considered in acquisition research of sign languages. I present new findings from German Sign Language (DGS) based on the data from the largest study to date on sign language development of children in DGS. The data consists of narrations by 72 native signing children, aged 4–11 years, elicited with the language-free stimulus video of the German Sign Language Production Test — Narrative Competences (NaKom DGS). The statistical analysis is based on a Generalized Additive Model, estimating nonlinear regression lines, which allow the visual representation of language development. In this study, aspectual verb modifications for continuatives, iteratives, and conatives are analyzed by changes in the movement parameter. Aspectual verb modifications occur in the elicited DGS narratives of children from the age of 4;8. Up to the age of 10;2 years, the data shows strong development with an increasing production frequency in the children’s narratives. The different types of aspectual verb modifications seem to develop divergingly. The results suggest that in DGS, the aspectual verb modifications conatives and iteratives are produced earlier and more frequently.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24017.kol
2025-08-08
2026-05-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/sll.24017.kol.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24017.kol&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barch, Deanna M. & Tal Yarkoni
    2013 Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neuroscience research, Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience131. 687–689.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Binnick, Robert I.
    1991Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Da Silva, Lídia
    2010Investigando a categoria aspectual na aquisição da língua brasileira de sinais. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Swart, Henriëtte
    2012 Verbal aspect. InRobert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 752–780. Oxford: Oxford University Press..
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dikyuva, Hasan
    2011Grammatical non-manual expressions in Turkish Sign Language. Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Enns, Charlotte, Vera Kolbe & Claudia Becker
    2021 Challenges and solutions in test adaptation: Comparing international experiences with the British Sign Language Production Test (Narrative Skills). Sign Language & Linguistics24(2), 226–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fahrmeir, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib & Stefan Lang
    2009Regression: Modelle, Methoden und Anwendungen. Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Filip, Hana
    2011 Aspectual class and Aktionsart. InClaudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 1186–1217. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2012 Lexical aspect. InRobert I. Binnick. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 721–751. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Finau, Rossana
    2004Os sinais de tempo e aspecto na LIBRAS. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2020 Tense and aspect system description for Brazilian Sign Language. InRonice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Brazilian Sign Language studies, 53–82. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gray, Michael
    2012Aspect marking in Australian Sign Language. Sydney: Macquairie University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
    2006Deutsche Gebärdensprache Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt: Fachhochschulverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hastie, Trevor & Robert Tibshirani
    1990Generalized additive models. London: Chapman and Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Herman, Rosalind, Nicola Grove, Sallie Holmes, Gary Morgan, Hillary Sutherland & Bencie Woll
    2004Assessing British Sign Language development: BSL production test (narrative skills). London: City University Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirschauer, Norbert, Oliver Mußhoff, Sven Grüner, Ulrich Frey, Insa Theesfeld & Peter Wagner
    2016 Die Interpretation des p-Wertes — Grundsätzliche Missverständnisse. Journal of Economics and Statistics236(5). 557–575.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin
    2001 Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages. A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 121–137. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    2007Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston, Trevor
    2008 The AUSLAN archive and corpus. InDavid J. Nathan (ed.), The Endangered Languages Archive. London: University of London. Available online atelar.soas.ac.uk/languages
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, Kelvyn & Simon Almond
    1992 Moving out of the linear rut: the possibilities of Generalized Additive Models. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers171. 434–447.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Karabüklü, Serpil & Ronnie B. Wilbur
    2021 Marking various aspects in Turkish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics24(2). 182–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kolbe, Vera
    2023Sprachproduktionstest zu narrativen Kompetenzen in Deutscher Gebärdensprache (NaKom DGS) — eine Testadaption. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin PhD dissertatoin. 10.18452/25868
    https://doi.org/10.18452/25868 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kolbe, Vera & Claudia Becker
    2023NaKom DGS — Sprachproduktionstest zu narrativen Kompetenzen in Deutscher Gebärdensprache. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Levshina, Natalia
    2015How to do linguistics with R: data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  28. Liddell, Scott
    1984 Unrealized inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. InJoseph Drogo, Veena Mishra & David Testen (eds.), Papers from the 20th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Oomen, Marloes
    2016 The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Languages of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam9(2), 30–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Palfreyman, Nicholas
    2015Sign language varieties of Indonesia: a linguistic and sociolinguistic investigation. Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Papaspyrou, Chrissostomos, Alexander von Meyenn, Michaela Matthaei & Bettina Herrmann
    2008Grammatik der Deutschen Gebärdensprache aus der Sicht gehörloser Fachleute. Seedorf: Signum Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll
    2012 Tense, aspect, and modality. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: an international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Pfau Roland & Markus Steinbach
    (eds.) 2017SignGram blueprint. A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2019R: A language and environment for statsistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rathmann, Christian
    2005Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team 2018RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwager, Waldemar
    2012 Morphologie: Bildung und Modifikation von Gebärden. InHanna Eichmann, Martje Hansen & Jens Heßmann (eds.), Handbuch Deutsche Gebärdensprache: sprachwissenschaftliche und anwendungsbezogene Perspektiven. Seedorf: Signum-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson & Uri Simonsohn
    2012 A 21 word solution. InDialogue. SSRN.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Simms, Laurene, Sharon Baker & Diane M. Clark
    2013 The standardized visual communication and sign language checklist for signing children. Sign Language Studies141. 101–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilbourn, Makeba Parramore & Marianella Casasola
    2007 Discriminating signs: Perceptual precursors to acquiring a visual-gestural language. Infant Behavior and Development30(1). 153–160. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wood, Simon N.
    2017aGeneralized Additive Models: An introduction with R. New York: Chapman and Hall. 10.1201/9781315370279
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 [Google Scholar]
  42. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2003 Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language & Linguistics6(1). 43–75.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24017.kol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.24017.kol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error