Historical introduction to the special issue on literariness

References

1. Attridge, D., & Elliot, J.
   (Eds.) (2011) Theory after theory. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Birns, N.
   (2010) Theory after theory: An intellectual history of literary theory from 1950 to the early 21st century. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bourdieu, P.
   (1995) The rules of art, genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Culler, J.
   (1975) Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203449769
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449769 [Google Scholar]
5. Culler, J.
   (2006) The literary in theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Di Girolamo, C.
   (1978) Critica della letterarietà. Il Saggiatore, Milano.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eagleton, T.
   (2004) After theory. New York, NY: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eco, U.
   (1979) Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eichenbaum, B. M.
   (1926/1971) The theory of the “formal method.”Ladislav.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Felski, R.
    (2008) Uses of literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444302790
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302790 [Google Scholar]
11. Fish, S.
    (1973–1974) How ordinary is ordinary language. New Literary History, 49.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grizelj, M., & Jahraus, O.
    (Eds.) (2011) Theorietheorie, Wider die Theoriemüdigkeit in den Geisteswissenschaften, Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Iser, W.
    (1976) The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens [Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading]. InR. Schrott, & A. M. Jacobs (2011) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp.492–450). München, Germany: Hanser.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2013) Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/235952745_Neurocognitive_Model_of_Literary_Reading
16. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015) Towards a neurocognitive model of literary reading. InR. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language (pp.135–160). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007 [Google Scholar]
17. Jakobson, R.
    (1987) Language in literature. K. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jauss, H. R.
    (1967) Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Miall, D.
    (2006) Literary reading empirical and theoretical studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Miall, D., & Kuiken, D.
    (1998) The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341. 10.1016/S0304‑422X(98)90003‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(98)90003-1 [Google Scholar]
21. Miall, D., & Kuiken, D.
    (1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121–138. 10.1080/01638539909545076
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545076 [Google Scholar]
22. Moretti, F.
    (2013) Distant reading. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mukarovský, J.
    (1932/1964) Standard language and poetic language. InP. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style (pp.17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Payne, M., & Schad, J.
    (Eds) (2004) life.after.theory: Jacques Derrida, Toril Moi, Frank Kermode and Christopher Norris. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pomorska, K.
    (1975) Introduction. InK. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Language in literature (pp.1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Shklovsky, V.
    (1917/1965) Art as technique. InL. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis, Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp.3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Stockwell, P.
    (2002) Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van Dijk, T.
    (1979) Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569–608. 10.1016/0304‑422X(79)90034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(79)90034-2 [Google Scholar]
29. Winko, S.
    (2009) Auf der Suche nach der Weltformel. Literarizität und Poetizität in der neueren literaturtheoretischen Diskussion, in: Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter S.374–399. 10.1515/9783110210835.4.374
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110210835.4.374 [Google Scholar]
30. Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G.
    (2009) Radikal historisiert. Für einen pragmatischen Literaturbegriff, in: Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3–41.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Zwaan, R.
    (1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156. 10.1016/0304‑422X(91)90003‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90003-8 [Google Scholar]
32. Zwaan, R.
    (1994) Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. 10.1037/0278‑7393.20.4.920
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920 [Google Scholar]