1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Historical introduction to the special issue on literariness, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ssol.00005.sal-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.00005.sal
2019-01-17
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attridge, D., & Elliot, J.
    (Eds.) (2011) Theory after theory. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Birns, N.
    (2010) Theory after theory: An intellectual history of literary theory from 1950 to the early 21st century. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdieu, P.
    (1995) The rules of art, genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Culler, J.
    (1975) Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203449769
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449769 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2006) The literary in theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Girolamo, C.
    (1978) Critica della letterarietà. Il Saggiatore, Milano.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eagleton, T.
    (2004) After theory. New York, NY: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eco, U.
    (1979) Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eichenbaum, B. M.
    (1926/1971) The theory of the “formal method.”Ladislav.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Felski, R.
    (2008) Uses of literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444302790
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302790 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fish, S.
    (1973–1974) How ordinary is ordinary language. New Literary History, 49.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grizelj, M., & Jahraus, O.
    (Eds.) (2011) Theorietheorie, Wider die Theoriemüdigkeit in den Geisteswissenschaften, Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Iser, W.
    (1976) The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens [Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading]. InR. Schrott, & A. M. Jacobs (2011) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp.492–450). München, Germany: Hanser.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2013) Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/235952745_Neurocognitive_Model_of_Literary_Reading
  16. (2015) Towards a neurocognitive model of literary reading. InR. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language (pp.135–160). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jakobson, R.
    (1987) Language in literature. K. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jauss, H. R.
    (1967) Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Miall, D.
    (2006) Literary reading empirical and theoretical studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Miall, D., & Kuiken, D.
    (1998) The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327–341. 10.1016/S0304‑422X(98)90003‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(98)90003-1 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121–138. 10.1080/01638539909545076
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545076 [Google Scholar]
  22. Moretti, F.
    (2013) Distant reading. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mukarovský, J.
    (1932/1964) Standard language and poetic language. InP. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style (pp.17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Payne, M., & Schad, J.
    (Eds) (2004) life.after.theory: Jacques Derrida, Toril Moi, Frank Kermode and Christopher Norris. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pomorska, K.
    (1975) Introduction. InK. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Language in literature (pp.1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shklovsky, V.
    (1917/1965) Art as technique. InL. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis, Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp.3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Stockwell, P.
    (2002) Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Dijk, T.
    (1979) Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569–608. 10.1016/0304‑422X(79)90034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(79)90034-2 [Google Scholar]
  29. Winko, S.
    (2009) Auf der Suche nach der Weltformel. Literarizität und Poetizität in der neueren literaturtheoretischen Diskussion, in: Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter S.374–399. 10.1515/9783110210835.4.374
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110210835.4.374 [Google Scholar]
  30. Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G.
    (2009) Radikal historisiert. Für einen pragmatischen Literaturbegriff, in: Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zwaan, R.
    (1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156. 10.1016/0304‑422X(91)90003‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90003-8 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1994) Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. 10.1037/0278‑7393.20.4.920
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.00005.sal
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error