Towards an empirical model of literariness

References

1. Aristotle T. S. Dorsch
   Aristotle (1965) Poetics, inClassical literary criticism, trans.T. S. Dorsch. London, United Kindgom: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blake, W.
   (1971) Marriage of heaven and hell. W. H. Stevenson & D. V. Erdman (Eds.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bruhn, M. J., & Miall, D. S.
   (2018) Citation analysis as a measure of the textual basis of literariness. 16th Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. Stavanger, Norway, July 25–28.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burke, E.
   (1990) A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. A. Phillips (Ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Damasio, A. R.
   (1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Grosset/Putman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gerrig, R. J.
   (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
   (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–21.10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
8. Independent
   Independent (1993) The Independent (May2 1993) Obituary for D. W. Harding.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kant, I.
   (1790/1987) Critique of Judgment. W. S. Pluhar (Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Keen, S.
    (2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14, 207–236.10.1353/nar.2006.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2006.0015 [Google Scholar]
11. Kelly, G.
    (1955) A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Peyk, P., and Junghofer, M.
    (2007) Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science, 18, 475–480.10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2007.01924.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01924.x [Google Scholar]
13. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S.
    (2004) Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25, 171–203.10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑171
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-171 [Google Scholar]
14. Levin, R.
    (1993) The new interdisciplinarity in literary criticism. InN. Easterlin & B. Riebling (Eds.), After Poststructuralism (pp.13–43). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Macherey, P.
    (1978) A theory of literary production. London, United Kingdom: Routledge and Kegan-Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
    (1991) A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193–232.10.1016/0304‑422X(91)90007‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90007-C [Google Scholar]
17. Martindale, C.
    (1990) The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Massey, I.
    (2009) The neural imagination: Aesthetic and neuroaesthetic approaches to the arts. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Miall, D. S.
    (1976) Aesthetic unity and the role of the brain. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35, 57–67.10.2307/430845
    https://doi.org/10.2307/430845 [Google Scholar]
20. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
    (1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407.10.1016/0304‑422X(94)00011‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5 [Google Scholar]
21. Miller, G. A.
    (1979) Images and models, similes and metaphors. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–250). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nauta, W. J. H.
    (1971) The problem of the frontal lobe: A reinterpretation. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, 167–187.10.1016/0022‑3956(71)90017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(71)90017-3 [Google Scholar]
23. Ortony, A.
    (1979) Metaphor & thought. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rorty, R.
    (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397 [Google Scholar]
25. Rose, J.
    (2001) The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Shklovsky, V.
    (1965) Art as technique. InL. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp.3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. van Peer, W.
    (1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Wolfeboro, NH: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wordsworth, W.
    (1965) “The Child is Father of the Man.” InJ. Stillinger (Ed.), Selected Poems and Prefaces (pp.186–191). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wordsworth, W.
    (1974) The prose works. W. J. B. Owen & J. W. Smyser (Eds.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
    (1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. 10.1037/0033‑2909.123.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 [Google Scholar]