1887
Volume 7 Number 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Stories with twist endings are popular, but little research has examined how readers experience them. To begin developing such an account, we examined the affective responses that emerge during stories with twist endings. In Experiment 1, 28 Japanese participants read a story with a twist ending. Greater empathy and stronger expectations were associated with slower reading times during participants’ first reading of the story. However, on participants’ second reading, greater empathy and stronger expectations were associated with faster reading times. In Experiment 2, we tested the generality of these effects by asking 36 English-speaking participants to read four stories with twist endings. The results were similar to Experiment 1. Readers’ initial and recurring responses to stories with twist endings reflect changes in surprise and empathy. These feelings underlie engagement with and interest in unexpected and often incoherent contents, which are characteristics of stories with twist endings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.17002.kom
2018-06-28
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
    (1993) Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 10611–070.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allbritton, D. W., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (1991) Participatory responses in text understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 603–626. 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90028‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90028-I [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2011) Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 562–577. 10.1037/a0023458
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023458 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2014) Emotions in reading and writing. InR. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp.437–457). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brewer, W. F.
    (1996) The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. InP. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp.107–127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
    (1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486. 10.1016/0378‑2166(82)90021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90021-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M.
    (2005) Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 45–66. 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D.
    (1998) The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 825–847. 10.1080/026999398379457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379457 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A.
    (2005) Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect. Discourse Processes, 40, 37–55. 10.1207/s15326950dp4001_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4001_2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2009) How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37, 547–555. 10.3758/MC.37.5.547
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.547 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerrig, R. J.
    (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerrig, R. J., Bagelmann, K. A., & Mumper, M. L.
    (2016) On the origins of readers’ outcome preferences. Discourse Processes, 53, 603–631.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gillioz, C., Gygax, P., & Tapiero, I.
    (2012) Individual differences and emotional inferences during reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 239–250. 10.1037/a0028625
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028625 [Google Scholar]
  14. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gygax, P., Tapiero, I., & Carruzzo, E.
    (2007) Emotion inferences during reading comprehension: What evidence can the self-pace reading paradigm provide?Discourse Processes, 44, 33–50. 10.1080/01638530701285564
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701285564 [Google Scholar]
  16. Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2003) Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 104–110. 10.3758/BF03196473
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196473 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoshi, S.
    (1985) “The cost of kindness” and other fabulous tales. Philadelphia, PA: C and P Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ishikawa, T.
    (1992) Aibiki. Kodansha. Tokyo. (in Japanese)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacovina, M. E., Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2014) Fool me twice: The consequences of reading (and rereading) inaccurate information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 558–56810.1002/acp.3035
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3035 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M.
    (1973) Reading rate as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90036‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M.
    (1975) Comprehension and recall oftext as a function of content variables. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80065‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80065-X [Google Scholar]
  22. Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T.
    (2009) Differences between estimating protagonists’ emotions and evaluating readers’ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 135–151. 10.1080/02699930801949116
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801949116 [Google Scholar]
  23. Komeda, H., & Kusumi, T.
    (2006) The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1548–1556. 10.3758/BF03195918
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195918 [Google Scholar]
  24. Komeda, H., Tsunemi, K., Inohara, K., Kusumi, T., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2013) Beyond disposition: The processing consequences of explicit and implicit invocations of empathy. Acta Psychologica, 142, 349–355. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Komeda, H., Nihei, Y., & Kusumi, T.
    (2005) The roles of readers’ feelings in understanding narratives: Forefeel, empathy, and a sense of strangeness. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 75, 479–486. (In Japanese with English abstract).10.4992/jjpsy.75.479
    https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.75.479 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L.
    (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Magliano, J. P., Skowronski, J. J., Britt, M. A., Guss, C. D., & Forsythe, C.
    (2008) What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others. Cognition, 106, 594–632. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Magliano, J. P., Taylor, H. A., & Kim, H. J.
    (2005) When goals collide: Monitoring the goals of multiple characters. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1357–1367. 10.3758/BF03193368
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193368 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192. 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  30. McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G.
    (2005) The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 88–102. 10.1037/0022‑0663.97.1.88
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88 [Google Scholar]
  31. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W.
    (1996) Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. 10.1080/01638539609544975
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mensink, M. C., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2011) Evil geniuses: Inferences derived from evidence and preferences. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1103–1116. 10.3758/s13421‑011‑0081‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0081-4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Miall, D. S.
    (1989) Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78. 10.1080/02699938908415236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908415236 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2002) Literary discourse. InGraesser, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 321–355.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
    (1995) Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2001) Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. Invan Peer, W. & Chatman, S. (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp.289–301). Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2002) A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30, 221–241. 10.1016/S0304‑422X(02)00011‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00011-6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Millis, K. K., Simon, S., & tenBroek, N. S.
    (1998) Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 26, 232–246. 10.3758/BF03201136
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201136 [Google Scholar]
  39. Oatley, K.
    (1994) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53–74. 10.1016/0304‑422X(94)P4296‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S [Google Scholar]
  40. (2002) Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. InM. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact (pp.39–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
    (1987) Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50. 10.1080/02699938708408362
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408362 [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G.
    (1998) Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J.
    (1990) What’s basic about basic emotions?Psychological Review, 97, 315–331. 10.1037/0033‑295X.97.3.315
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315 [Google Scholar]
  44. Peshkam, A., Mensink, M. C., Putnam, A. L., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2011) Warning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 219–231. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
    (2016) Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 44, 1064–1075.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2002) “Get up and win!”: Participatory responses to narrative. InM. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp.71–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E.
    (2001) Situation models and aging. Psychology and Aging, 16, 145–160. 10.1037/0882‑7974.16.1.145
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.145 [Google Scholar]
  48. Raney, G. E., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S.
    (2000) Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 29, 61–81. 10.1207/S15326950dp2901_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_4 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rapp, D. N.
    (2008) How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?Memory & Cognition, 36, 688–701. 10.3758/MC.36.3.688
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.688 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2002) Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779–788. 10.3758/BF03196433
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196433 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2006) Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 54–67. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A.
    (2001) Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737–750. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2789
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2789 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rapp, D. N., Komeda, H., & Hinze, S. R.
    (2011) Vivifications of literary investigation. The Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 123–135. 10.1075/ssol.1.1.13rap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.13rap [Google Scholar]
  54. Scrimin, S., & Mason, L.
    (2015) Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 387–406. 10.1111/bjep.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12080 [Google Scholar]
  55. van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P.
    (in press). The development of language comprehension skills: Change and continuity in the ability to build coherence. InK. Cain & D. Compton Eds. Theories of reading development, a 20 year celebration of scientific studies of reading. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Yuhtsuen, T., & Linderholm, T.
    (1999) The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. InH. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp.71–98). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. VandenBos, G. R.
    (Ed.) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M.
    (2013) Connected text reading anddifferences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS One, 8:e71914. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071914
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071914 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zillmann, D.
    (1994) Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23, 33–51. 10.1016/0304‑422X(94)00020‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00020-7 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zwaan, R. A.
    (1999a) Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. InS. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp.93–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (1999b) Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81–88. 10.1080/01638539909545070
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545070 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
    (1995) Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 386–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
    (1998) Situational models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. 10.1037/0033‑2909.123.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M.
    (1998) Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199–220. 10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2006) Discourse comprehension. InM. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp.725–764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑012369374‑7/50019‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50019-5 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.17002.kom
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.17002.kom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse comprehension , emotion , empathy , narrative comprehension , rereading and twist endings
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error