1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 9, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that narrative fiction promotes social justice by increasing empathy, but critics have argued that the partiality of empathy severely limits its effectiveness as an engine of social justice, and that what needs to be developed is universal compassion rather than empathy. We created Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy (CCP) to target the development of two social-cognition capabilities that entail compassion: (1) recognition of self-other overlap and (2) cognizance of the situational, uncontrollable causes of bad character, bad behavior, and bad life-outcomes. Employing a pre/post within- and between-subjects design, we found that students in the CCP classes, but not students in conventionally taught classes, improved in these two areas of social cognition and also exhibited increased preference for compassionate social policies for stigmatized groups. This finding suggests that pedagogy can play a significant role in literature’s contribution to social justice, and that further efforts to develop and test pedagogies for improving social cognition are warranted.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
2020-06-30
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkins, P. W. B., & Parker, S. K.
    (2012) Understanding individual compassion in organizations: The role of appraisals and psychological flexibility. Academy of Management Review, 307, 524–546. doi: 10.5465/arar.2010.0490
     https://doi.org/10.5465/arar.2010.0490 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldwin, J.
    (1955) Everybody’s protest novel. Notes of a native son. New York: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Heiberger, L.
    (1997) Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118. 10.1037/0022‑3514.72.1.105
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105 [Google Scholar]
  4. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J.
    (2002) Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666. doi:  10.1177/014616702237647
     https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647 [Google Scholar]
  5. Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Cermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G.
    (2007) An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 65–74. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.93.1.65
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65 [Google Scholar]
  6. Batson, C. D.
    (2017) The empathy-altruism hypothesis: What and so what?InE. M. Seppälä, E. Simon-Thomas, S. L. Brown, M. G. Worline, C. D. Camerion, & J. R. Doty (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science (pp.27–40). New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergen, B. K., & Wheeler, K.
    (2005) Sentence understanding engages motor processes. InProceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New York: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berlant, L.
    (1998) Poor Eliza. American Literature, 70, 635–668. 10.2307/2902712
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2902712 [Google Scholar]
  9. Betancourt, H.
    (1990) An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 573–591. 10.1177/0146167290163015
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290163015 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P.
    (2001) Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–841. doi: 10.1037//0022‑3514l81.5.828
     https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514l81.5.828 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloom, P.
    (2016) Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. London: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bracher, M.
    (2013) Literature and social justice: Protest novels, cognitive politics, and schema criticism. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Camerer, C. F.
    (2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 637–644. doi:  10.1038/s41562‑018‑0399‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z [Google Scholar]
  14. Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L.
    (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494. 10.1037/0022‑3514.73.3.481
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crocker, J., & Canevello, A.
    (2012) Consequences of self-image and compassionate goals. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 229–277. doi:  10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑394286‑9.00005‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00005-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Egosystem and ecosystem: Motivational orientations of the self in relation to others. InK. W. Brown & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hypo-Egoic Phenomena (pp.271–284). New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G.
    (2001) On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814. doi:  10.1037//0022‑3514.81.5.800
     https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.800 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & and Luce, C.
    (1996) Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726. 10.1037/0022‑3514.70.4.713
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713 [Google Scholar]
  19. Decety, J., Echols, S., & Correl, J.
    (2009) The blame game: The effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22, 985–997. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21266
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21266 [Google Scholar]
  20. Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3, 28–47. doi:  10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  21. Ekman, P.
    (2014) Moving toward global compassion. San Francisco: Paul Ekman Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Eliot, G.
    (1856) The natural history of German life. The Westminster Review, 66, 23–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Feagin, J.
    (1972) Poverty: We still believe that god helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fein, S., & and Steven Spencer, S.
    (1997) Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44. 10.1037/0022‑3514.73.1.31
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31 [Google Scholar]
  25. Galinsky, A. D. and Moskowitz, G. B.
    (2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. doi:  10.1037//0022‑3514.78.4.708
     https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N.
    (2004) Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25, 265–281. 10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑265
     https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-265 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilbert, P., & Choden
    (2014) Mindful compassion. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gill, M. J., Andreychik, M. R., & Getty, P. D.
    (2013) More than a lack of control: External explanations can evoke compassion for outgroups by increasing perceptions of suffering (independent of perceived control)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 73–87. doi:  10.1177/0146167212460281
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212460281 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gill, M. J., & Cerce, S. C.
    (2017) He never willed to have the will he has: Historicist narratives, “civilized” blame, and the need to distinguish two notions of free will. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 361–382. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000073
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000073 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E.
    (2010) Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374. doi:  10.1037/a0018807
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807 [Google Scholar]
  31. Greene, J., & Cohen, J.
    (2004) For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1775–1785. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546 [Google Scholar]
  32. Guerin, S., Begin, G., & Palmer, D. L.
    (1989) Education and causal attributions: The development of “person-blame” and “system-blame” ideology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 126–140. 10.2307/2786912
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2786912 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., & Bal, P. M.
    (2016) Learning from Literature: Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace. InM. Burke, O. Fialho, & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments (19–37). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.24.02hak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.02hak [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris, S.
    (2012) Free will. New York: Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Heider, F.
    (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. 10.1037/10628‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000 [Google Scholar]
  36. Henry, P. J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B.
    (2004) Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 34–58. 10.1111/j.1559‑1816.2004.tb02536.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Jinpa, T.
    (2015) A fearless heart: How the courage to be compassionate can transform our lives. New York: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 150–155. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2013) Reading narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup anxiety. Social Cognition, 31, 578–598. 10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578
     https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578 [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S.
    (2013) Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 306–312. doi:  10.1037/a0033261
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033261 [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnson, M.
    (2015) Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the standpoint of cognitive science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Karcher, C. L.
    (2004) Stowe and the literature of social change. InC. Weinstein (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Harriet Beecher Stowe (pp.203–218). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL052182592X.012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052182592X.012 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K.
    (2012) Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1–19. doi:  10.1037/a0027525
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525 [Google Scholar]
  44. Keen, S.
    (2007) Empathy and the novel. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Sciencexpress3October. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kidd, D., Ongis, M., & and Castano, E.
    (2016) On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 6, 42–58. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid [Google Scholar]
  47. Kidd, D., & Castano, E.
    (2017) Commentary: Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, e1–e4. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000072
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000072 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S.
    (2004) Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25, 171–203. 10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑171
     https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-171 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, H.
    (1960) To kill a mockingbird. New York: Warner Books
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lerner, M. J.
    (1980) The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑0448‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindhé, A.
    (2016) The paradox of narrative empathy and the form of the novel, or what George Eliot knew. Studies in the Novel, 48, 19–42. 10.1353/sdn.2016.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2016.0011 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lopez, G. E., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A.
    (1998) Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities. Political Psychology, 19, 308–329. 10.1111/0162‑895X.00106
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00106 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  55. Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N.
    (2001) The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 1–39. doi:  10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nussbaum, M.
    (1997) Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2001) Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840715
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840715 [Google Scholar]
  59. O’Donnell, C. L.
    (2008) Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84. doi:  10.3102/0034654307313793
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793 [Google Scholar]
  60. Oveis, C., Horberg, E. J., & Keltner, D.
    (2010) Compassion, pride, and social intuitions of self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 618–630. doi:  10.1037/a0017628
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017628 [Google Scholar]
  61. Panero, M. E., Black, J., Barnes, J. L., Weisberg, D. S., Goldstein, T. R., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, e46–e54. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000064
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2017) No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano’s Commentary on Panero et al. (2016). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, e5–e8. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000079
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000079 [Google Scholar]
  63. Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C.
    (1997) Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 420–434. 10.1037/0022‑3514.72.2.420
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.420 [Google Scholar]
  64. Pinker, S.
    (2002) The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Pollard-Gott, L.
    (1993) Attribution theory and the novel. Poetics, 21, 499–524. 10.1016/0304‑422X(93)90011‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(93)90011-5 [Google Scholar]
  66. Reyna, C., Henry, P. J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A.
    (2005) Examining the principles of principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 109–128. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.90.1.109
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rorty, R.
    (1999) Human rights, rationality and sentimentality.” InObrad Savic (Ed.). The politics of human rights (pp.67–83). New York, NY: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B.
    (2004) A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 815–848. doi:  10.1080/02699930341000248
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000248 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ryan, W.
    (1976) Blaming the victim. 2nd ed.New York: Vintage.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L.
    (2018) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 32, 130–144. doi:  10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591 [Google Scholar]
  71. Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
    (2019a) Gaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 89, 3–45. doi:  10.3102/0034654318812914
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318812914 [Google Scholar]
  72. Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
    (2019b) Transformative Dialogic Teaching fosters adolescents’ insight into human nature and motivation. Learning and Instruction, 63, 1–15. doi:  10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101216
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101216 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sims, B.
    (2003) The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 1–25. 10.1177/073401680302800102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680302800102 [Google Scholar]
  74. Singer, T., & Bolz, M.
    Eds. (2013) Compassion: Bridging Practice and Science. Munich: Max Planck Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Smith, E. R., & Jamie DeCoster, J.
    (2000) Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01 [Google Scholar]
  76. Solomon, R.
    (1997) In defense of sentimentality. InMette Hjort and Sue Laver (Ed.), Emotion and the Arts (225–241). New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Spears, R.
    (2002) Four degrees of stereotype formation: differentiation by any means necessary. InC. McGarty, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (ed.). Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (127–156). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489877.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489877.008 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sripada, C.
    (2016) Imaginative guidance: A mind forever wandering. InM. E. P. Seligman, P. Railton, R. F. Baumeister, & C. Sripada (Eds.), Homo prospectus (103–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Stowe, H. B.
    (1994) Uncle Tom’s Cabin. New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Strawson, G.
    (1994) The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 75, 5–24. 10.1007/BF00989879
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989879 [Google Scholar]
  81. Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D.
    (2014) Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 374–387. 10.1111/spc3.12116
     https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12116 [Google Scholar]
  82. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P.
    (2003) Perspective-taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472. doi:  10.1002/ejsp.163
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163 [Google Scholar]
  83. Waller, B. N.
    (2011) Against moral responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262016599.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016599.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  84. Weiner, B.
    (1995) Judgments of Responsibility. New York: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Wheatley, T.
    (2015) Neuroscience versus phenomenology and the implications for justice. InJ. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain: An interdisciplinary perspective (267–278). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Wondra, J. D., & Ellsworth, P. C.
    (2015) An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychological Review, 122, 411–428. doi:  10.1037/a0039252
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039252 [Google Scholar]
  87. Woodward, K.
    (2004) Calculating compassion. InLauren Berlant (Ed.), Compassion (59–86). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
Loading
Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy
Scientific Study of Literature 9, 107 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): compassion; empathy; literature; pedagogy; social cognition; social justice

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error