1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We test the literariness of genre fiction with an empirical study that directly manipulates both intrinsic text properties and extrinsic reader expectations of literary merit for science-fiction and narrative-realism stories. Participants were told they were going to read a story of either low or high literary merit and then read one of two stories that were identical except for one genre-determining word. There were no differences between the science-fiction and narrative-realism versions of the story in literary merit perception, text comprehension, or inference effort for theory of mind and plot. Participants did, however, exert more theory-of-world effort (i.e., world-building) for the science-fiction version. The more inference effort science-fiction readers dedicated to theory of world, the more cognitively and emotionally engaged they were. These results contradict the assumption that science fiction cannot achieve literariness and instead demonstrate a “literary genre effect.”

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
2020-02-04
2023-12-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexandrov, V. E.
    (2007) Literature, literariness, and the brain. Comparative Literature, 59(2), 97–118. 10.1215/‑59‑2‑97
     https://doi.org/10.1215/-59-2-97 [Google Scholar]
  2. Appel, M. , Gnambs, T. , Richter, T. & Green, M.
    (2015) The transportation scale–short form (TS–SF), Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. doi:  10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.987400 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes, J.
    (2018) Imaginary engagement, real-world effects: Fiction, emotion, and social cognition. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 125–134. 10.1037/gpr0000124
     https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000124 [Google Scholar]
  4. Benthian, C.
    (2012) The Literariness of new media art – a case for expanding the domain of literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory, 6, 311–336. doi:  10.1515/jlt‑2012‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carney, J. , Wlodarski, R. & Dunbar, R.
    (2014) Inference or enaction? The impact of genre on the narrative processing of other minds. PLoS ONE, 9(12): e114172. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0114172
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114172 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chung-Fat-Yim, A. , Peterson, J. & Mar, R.
    (2017) Validating self-paced sentence-by-sentence reading: Story comprehension, recall, and narrative transportation. Read Writ, 30, 857–869. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑016‑9704‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9704-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodell-Feder, D. , & Tamir, D. I.
    (2018) Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1037/xge0000395
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dixon, P. , & Bortolussi, M.
    (2011) The scientific study of literature: what can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 59–71. doi:  10.1075/ssol.1.1.06dix
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.06dix [Google Scholar]
  9. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. , & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3, 28–47. 10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  10. Duchamp, L.
    (2015) A few thoughts about critics, legitimacy, and comfort. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, 5(2), 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Emmott, C. , Sanford, A. J. , & Dawydiak, E. J.
    (2007) Stylistics meet cognitive science: Studying style in fiction and readers’ attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style, 41, 204–224.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fong, K., Mullin, J., & Mar, R.
    (2013) What you read matters: the role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi:  10.1037/a0034084
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gavaler, C. , & Johnson, D.
    (2017) The genre effect: A science fiction (vs. realism) manipulation decreases inference effort, reading comprehension, and perceptions of literary merit. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 79–108. doi:  10.1075/ssol.7.1.04gav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.04gav [Google Scholar]
  14. Gavaler, C.
    (2017) Science fiction makes you stupid, Comments, The Patron Saint of Superheroes, https://thepatronsaintofsuperheroes.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/science-fiction-makes-you-stupid/
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanauer, D.
    (1998) Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 19, 565–580. 10.2307/1773260
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1773260 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kidd, D. , & Castano, E.
    (2017) Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 114, 474–486. 10.1037/aca0000069
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000069 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2019) Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. doi:  10.1177/1948550618775410
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775410 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koopman, E. M.
    (2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 82–98. doi:  10.1037/aca0000041
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041 [Google Scholar]
  20. Louwerse, M. , Benesh, N. , & Zhang, B.
    (2008) Computationally discriminating literary from non-literary texts. In S. Zyngier , M. Bortolussi , A. Chesnokova , & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: In honor of Willie van Peer. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamin. 10.1075/lal.5.16lou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.5.16lou [Google Scholar]
  21. Miall, D. S.
    (2009) The neuropsychology of literariness [Abstract]. Conference on Neuroaesthetics, September 24–26, Copenhagen. RetrievedNovember 11, 2016, fromhttps://sites.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/reading/confer.htm
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 7–14. doi:  10.1075/ssol.1.1.01mia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.01mia [Google Scholar]
  23. (2007) Foregrounding and the sublime: Shelley in Chamonix. Language and Literature, 16, 155–168. doi:  10.1177/0963947007075982
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075982 [Google Scholar]
  24. Panero, M. E. , Black, J. , Barnes, J. L. , Weisberg, D. S. , Goldstein, T. R. , Brownell, H. , & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, e46–e54. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000064
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  25. Phillips, N.
    (2017) yarrr: A companion to the e-book “YaRrr!: The Pirate’s Guide to R”. v. 0.1.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=yarrr
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Rayner, K. , Schotter, E. , Masson, M. , Potter, M. & Treiman, R.
    (2016) So much to read, so little time: how do we read, and can speed reading help?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi:  10.1177/1529100615623267
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shen, Y.
    (2007) Foregrounding in poetic discourse: Between deviation and cognitive constraints. Language and Literature, 16(2), 169–181. doi:  10.1177/0963947007075983
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075983 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tukachinsky, R.
    (2014) Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33. doi:  10.1080/19312458.2013.873777
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777 [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Peer, W.
    (1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (2007) Introduction to foregrounding: a state of the art. Language and Literature, 16, 99–104. 10.1177/0963947007075978
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075978 [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaughn, L. A. , Hesse, S. J. , Petkova, Z. , & Trudeau, L.
    (2009) “This story is right on”: The impact of regulatory fit on narrative engagement and persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 447–456. doi:  10.1002/ejsp.570
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.570 [Google Scholar]
  32. Whalen, D. H. , Zunshine, L. , & Holquist, M.
    (2012) Theory of mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary “sweet spot.” Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 301–315. doi:  10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
Loading
The literary genre effect
Scientific Study of Literature 9, 34 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19010.joh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): genre; inference; literariness; literary fiction; realism; science fiction; theory of mind; theory of world

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error