1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Reading fiction is beneficial for various social skills, although reading has become less and less popular with younger generations. This study investigated whether reading a chapter of a fictional story in virtual reality (VR) can make the reading experience more appealing and increase intention to read the story further. A between-subject experiment ( = 83) was conducted to compare the effect of a printed book and a VR reading environment on narrative absorption, empathy with fictional characters, and intention to read. The results show that VR enhances intention to read, via a serial mediation of transportation into the story world and affective empathy. These findings indicate that VR can be effectively exploited for promoting reading.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19013.pia
2020-06-30
2020-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allington, D.
    (2011) ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature, 20(4), 317–332. doi:  10.1177/0963947011398558
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011398558 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andromedum
    Andromedum (2016) Imbanova Entertainment. https://store.steampowered.com/app/457660/Andromedum/
  3. Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D.
    (2017) Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aphiddd
    Aphiddd (2019) Dreaming Methods. https://dreamingmethods.com/portfolio/aphiddd/
  5. Archer, D., & Finger, K.
    (2018, March15). Walking in another’s virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers?Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/virtual-reality-news-empathy.php/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailenson, J. N.
    (2018) Experience on Demand. What Virtual Reality is, How it works, and What it can do. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, L., & Scher, D.
    (2002) Beginning Readers’ Motivation for Reading in Relation to Parental Beliefs and Home Reading Experiences. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 239–269. doi:  10.1080/713775283
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713775283 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bálint, K., Kuijpers, M., & Doicaru, M.
    (2017) The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption in literature and film. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.177–197). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.27.10bal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.10bal [Google Scholar]
  9. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B.
    (2004) Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(6), 734–741. doi:  10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734 [Google Scholar]
  10. Batson, C. D.
    (2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. InJ. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp.3–15). MIT Press. doi:  10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., & Laccetti, J. M.
    (2010) A [S]creed for Digital Fiction. Electronic Book Review. electronicbookreview.com/essay/a-screed-for-digital-fiction/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, A., Ensslin, A., van der Bom, I., & Smith, J.
    (2018) Immersion in Digital Fiction: A Cognitive, Empirical Approach. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 7(1), 1–22. doi:  10.15462/ijll.v7i1.105
    https://doi.org/10.15462/ijll.v7i1.105 [Google Scholar]
  13. Burke, M.
    (2011) Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, M., & Bon, E. V.
    (2018) The Locations and Means of Literary Reading (Vol.1). Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oso/9780190457747.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190457747.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burke, M., Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., & Schilhab, T.
    (2016) Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 6–41. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur [Google Scholar]
  16. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
    (2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. doi:  10.1080/15213260903287259
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Beyond metaphors and traditions. Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.11–27). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Caracciolo, M.
    (2014) The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110365658
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365658 [Google Scholar]
  19. Carroll, L.
    (1865) Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1947) De avonturen van Alice (A. Kossmann, Trans.). Ad Donker.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, K.-H.
    (2017) Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53–69. doi:  10.14742/ajet.2820
    https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2820 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chin Ee, L., & Baoqi, S.
    (2018) Report on the Reading Habits of Singapore Teenagers 2017. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cho, B.-H., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, S., Lee, Y. H., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I.
    (2002) The effect of virtual reality cognitive training for attention enhancement. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 5(2), 129–137. doi:  10.1089/109493102753770516
    https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770516 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cho, B.-H., Lee, J. M., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, J. S., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I.
    (2002) Attention Enhancement System using virtual reality and EEG biofeedback. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, 156–163. doi:  10.1109/VR.2002.996518
    https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2002.996518 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clark, C., & Teravainen, A.
    (2017) Children’s and Young People’s Reading in 2016. Findings from our Annual Literacy Survey 2016. National Literacy Trust.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Clinton, V.
    (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9817.12269
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cohen, J.
    (2001) Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. doi:  10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T.
    (2001) Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students’ Amount of Reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116–131. doi:  10.1006/ceps.1999.1044
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1044 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N.
    (2016) How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. doi:  10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T.
    (2004) Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. InE. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp.175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L.
    (2018) Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. doi:  10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A.
    (2015) The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(26). doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I.
    (2018) Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. doi:  10.1037/xge0000395
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395 [Google Scholar]
  34. Feierabend, S., Rathgeb, T., & Reutter, T.
    (2018) JIM-Studie 2018. Jugend, Information, Medien. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D.
    (2011) Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. doi:  10.1111/j.1754‑8845.2011.01103.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01103.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A.
    (2013) What You Read Matters: The Role of Fiction Genre in Predicting Interpersonal Sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi:  10.1037/a0034084
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gorini, A., Capideville, C. S., De Leo, G., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G.
    (2011) The Role of Immersion and Narrative in Mediated Presence: The Virtual Hospital Experience. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 99–105. doi:  10.1089/cyber.2010.0100
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0100 [Google Scholar]
  38. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  39. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F.
    (2004) Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2004.tb00317.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J.
    (2008) Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. doi:  10.1080/15213260802492000
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802492000 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., Böcking, S., Ravaja, N., Laarni, J., Saari, T., Gouveia, F., & Maria Sacau, A.
    (2016) The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES): A Short Self-Report Measure for Diverse Media Settings. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1), 1–15. doi:  10.1027/1864‑1105/a000137
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hayes, A. F.
    (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second edition). The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hayles, N. K.
    (2008) Electronic literature: New Horizons for the Literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J.
    (2018) Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0204494. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0204494
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jenkins, H.
    (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E.
    (2015) Spoiler Alert: Consequences of Narrative Spoilers for Dimensions of Enjoyment, Appreciation, and Transportation. Communication Research, 42(8), 1068–1088. doi:  10.1177/0093650214564051
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214564051 [Google Scholar]
  47. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Johnsson-Smaragdi, U., & Jönsson, A.
    (2006) Book Reading in Leisure Time: Long-Term changes in young peoples’ book reading habits. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 519–540. doi:  10.1080/00313830600953600
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600953600 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kidd, D., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2019) Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. doi:  10.1177/1948550618775410
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775410 [Google Scholar]
  51. Krakowiak, K. M., & Oliver, M. B.
    (2012) When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01618.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Kress, G. R.
    (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Bálint, K., Doicaru, M. M., & Tan, E. S.
    (2017) Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.29–48). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.27.03kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.03kui [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M.
    (2014) Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuzmičová, A.
    (2014) Literary Narrative and Mental Imagery: A View from Embodied Cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293. doi: 10.1111/comt.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12084 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2016) Does it Matter Where You Read? Situating Narrative in Physical Environment. Communication Theory, 26(3), 290–308. doi:  10.1111/comt.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12084 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C.
    (2017) Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137–152. doi:  10.1177/0963947017704729
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704729 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J.
    (2001) A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. doi:  10.1162/105474601300343612
    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lissa, C. J. van, Caracciolo, M., Duuren, T. van, & Leuveren, B. van
    (2016) Difficult Empathy. The Effect of Narrative Perspective on Readers’ Engagement with a First-Person Narrator. Diegesis, 5(1), 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., Ijsselsteijn, W., & Schaevitz, R. J.
    (Eds.) (2015) Immersed in Media: Telepresence Theory, Measurement & Technology. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10190‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10190-3 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T.
    (1997) At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.1997.tb00072.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., & Weinstein, L.
    (2009) Measuring Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/308b/16bec9f17784fed039ddf4f86a856b36a768.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D.
    (2014) Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man [Google Scholar]
  64. Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L.
    (2019) Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 38. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J.
    (2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. doi:  10.1080/02699931.2010.515151
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  68. Marcos, D., Ngo, K., & Goberna, D.
    (2017) A-Frame (Version 0.8.0) [Computer software]. htttp://www.aframe.io
    [Google Scholar]
  69. (2018) Supermedium. htttp://www.supermedium.com
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Martignano, A. J., Herrera, F., Castano, E., & Konrath, S.
    (2019) Virtual Reality Can Increase Empathy: A preregistered Meta-Analysis. 31st Annual Convention for the Association for Psychological Science, Washington DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W.
    (2010) This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 361–368. doi:  10.1177/1948550610376600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600 [Google Scholar]
  72. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  73. Neumann, D., & Moffitt, R.
    (2018) Affective and Attentional States When Running in a Virtual Reality Environment. Sports, 6(3), 71. doi:  10.3390/sports6030071
    https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030071 [Google Scholar]
  74. Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J.
    (2012) The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. doi:  10.1177/1077699012439020
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020 [Google Scholar]
  75. Pasieka, T. [Google Scholar]
  76. Peters, S., & van Strien, S.
    (2018) Boekenbranche meting 44. 1e themameting van 2018 naar het kopen, lezen en lenen van boeken onder jongeren tussen 12 en 25 jaar. GfK.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pianzola, F. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pianzola, Federico, Weller, Jessica, & Bálint, Katalin
    (2019) Experimental data for “Virtual Reality as a Tool for Promoting Reading via Enhanced Narrative Absorption and Empathy” [Data set]. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3706937
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3706937 [Google Scholar]
  79. Potthoff, R. F.
    (1964) On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29(3), 241–256. doi:  10.1007/BF02289721
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289721 [Google Scholar]
  80. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I.
    (2020) A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 [Google Scholar]
  81. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M.
    (2007) Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45–56. doi:  10.1089/cpb.2006.9993
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 [Google Scholar]
  82. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A.
    (2015) Intention, Action, Self and Other: An Evolutionary Model of Presence. InM. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. IJsselsteijn, & R. J. Schaevitz (Eds.), Immersed in Media (pp.73–99). Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10190‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10190-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  83. Rooney, B., Burke, C., Balint, K., O’Leary, T., Parsons, T., Lee, C. T., & Mantei, C.
    (2017) Virtual reality, presence and social cognition: The effect of eye-gaze and narrativity on character engagement. 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), 1–6. doi:  10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346272
    https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346272 [Google Scholar]
  84. Ryan, M.-L.
    (2015) Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media (Second edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Schmidt, S., Ehrenbrink, P., Weiss, B., Voigt-Antons, J.-N., Kojic, T., Johnston, A., & Moller, S.
    (2018) Impact of Virtual Environments on Motivation and Engagement During Exergames. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 1–6. doi:  10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463389
    https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463389 [Google Scholar]
  86. Schutte, N. S., & Stilinović, E. J.
    (2017) Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 708–712. doi:  10.1007/s11031‑017‑9641‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9641-7 [Google Scholar]
  87. Shen, L.
    (2010) On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504–524. doi:  10.1080/10570314.2010.512278
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512278 [Google Scholar]
  88. Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., F. P., & Whitton, M. C.
    (2017) A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1–39. doi:  10.1145/3134301
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301 [Google Scholar]
  89. Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M.
    (2009) Reading Stories Activates Neural Representations of Visual and Motor Experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02397.x [Google Scholar]
  90. Sukalla, F., Bilandzic, H., Bolls, P. D., & Busselle, R.
    (2016) Embodiment of Narrative Engagement: Connecting Self-Reported Narrative Engagement to Psychophysiological Measures. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 175–186. doi:  10.1027/1864‑1105/a000153
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000153 [Google Scholar]
  91. Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J.
    (2010) Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  92. Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A.
    (2014) How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 328–341. doi:  10.1111/spc3.12110
    https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12110 [Google Scholar]
  93. van Loon, A., Bailenson, J., Zaki, J., Bostick, J., & Willer, R.
    (2018) Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0202442. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0202442
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202442 [Google Scholar]
  94. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
    (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:  10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
    https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 [Google Scholar]
  95. Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, L., Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Ravaja, N., Sacau, A., Baumgartner, T., & Jäncke, P.
    (2004) MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC- SPQ): Short Documentation and Instructions for Application (p.14). Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661). www.ijk.hmt-hannover.de/presence
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Wales, N.
    (2016) The Raven. Space Pen Studios. https://www.oculus.com/experiences/go/974760535972181/
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wei, W., Qi, R., & Zhang, L.
    (2019) Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management, 71, 282–293. doi:  10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024 [Google Scholar]
  98. Wennekers, A., Haan, J. de, & Huysmans, F.
    (2016) Media: Tijd in kaart. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Whalen, Z. N.
    (2008) The videogame text: Typography and textuality [University of Florida]. etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0022526/whalen_z.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J.
    (1998) Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. doi:  10.1162/105474698565686
    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686 [Google Scholar]
  101. Yu, C.-L., & Chou, T.-L.
    (2018) A Dual Route Model of Empathy: A Neurobiological Prospective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 2012 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02212
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02212 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19013.pia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.19013.pia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): empathy , fiction , narrative absorption , reading , transportation and virtual reality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error