Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Reading fiction is beneficial for various social skills, although reading has become less and less popular with younger generations. This study investigated whether reading a chapter of a fictional story in virtual reality (VR) can make the reading experience more appealing and increase intention to read the story further. A between-subject experiment ( = 83) was conducted to compare the effect of a printed book and a VR reading environment on narrative absorption, empathy with fictional characters, and intention to read. The results show that VR enhances intention to read, via a serial mediation of transportation into the story world and affective empathy. These findings indicate that VR can be effectively exploited for promoting reading.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allington, D.
    (2011) ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature, 20(4), 317–332. doi:  10.1177/0963947011398558
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011398558 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andromedum
    Andromedum (2016) Imbanova Entertainment. https://store.steampowered.com/app/457660/Andromedum/
  3. Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D.
    (2017) Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aphiddd
    Aphiddd (2019) Dreaming Methods. https://dreamingmethods.com/portfolio/aphiddd/
  5. Archer, D., & Finger, K.
    (2018, March15). Walking in another’s virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers?Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/virtual-reality-news-empathy.php/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailenson, J. N.
    (2018) Experience on Demand. What Virtual Reality is, How it works, and What it can do. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, L., & Scher, D.
    (2002) Beginning Readers’ Motivation for Reading in Relation to Parental Beliefs and Home Reading Experiences. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 239–269. doi:  10.1080/713775283
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713775283 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bálint, K., Kuijpers, M., & Doicaru, M.
    (2017) The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption in literature and film. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.177–197). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.27.10bal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.10bal [Google Scholar]
  9. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B.
    (2004) Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(6), 734–741. doi:  10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734 [Google Scholar]
  10. Batson, C. D.
    (2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. InJ. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp.3–15). MIT Press. doi:  10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., & Laccetti, J. M.
    (2010) A [S]creed for Digital Fiction. Electronic Book Review. electronicbookreview.com/essay/a-screed-for-digital-fiction/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, A., Ensslin, A., van der Bom, I., & Smith, J.
    (2018) Immersion in Digital Fiction: A Cognitive, Empirical Approach. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 7(1), 1–22. doi:  10.15462/ijll.v7i1.105
    https://doi.org/10.15462/ijll.v7i1.105 [Google Scholar]
  13. Burke, M.
    (2011) Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, M., & Bon, E. V.
    (2018) The Locations and Means of Literary Reading (Vol.1). Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oso/9780190457747.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190457747.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burke, M., Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., & Schilhab, T.
    (2016) Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 6–41. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur [Google Scholar]
  16. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
    (2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. doi:  10.1080/15213260903287259
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Beyond metaphors and traditions. Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.11–27). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Caracciolo, M.
    (2014) The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach. de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110365658
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365658 [Google Scholar]
  19. Carroll, L.
    (1865) Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1947) De avonturen van Alice (A. Kossmann, Trans.). Ad Donker.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, K.-H.
    (2017) Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53–69. doi:  10.14742/ajet.2820
    https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2820 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chin Ee, L., & Baoqi, S.
    (2018) Report on the Reading Habits of Singapore Teenagers 2017. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cho, B.-H., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, S., Lee, Y. H., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I.
    (2002) The effect of virtual reality cognitive training for attention enhancement. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 5(2), 129–137. doi:  10.1089/109493102753770516
    https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770516 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cho, B.-H., Lee, J. M., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, J. S., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. I.
    (2002) Attention Enhancement System using virtual reality and EEG biofeedback. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, 156–163. doi:  10.1109/VR.2002.996518
    https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2002.996518 [Google Scholar]
  25. Clark, C., & Teravainen, A.
    (2017) Children’s and Young People’s Reading in 2016. Findings from our Annual Literacy Survey 2016. National Literacy Trust.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Clinton, V.
    (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9817.12269
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cohen, J.
    (2001) Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. doi:  10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T.
    (2001) Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students’ Amount of Reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116–131. doi:  10.1006/ceps.1999.1044
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1044 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N.
    (2016) How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. doi:  10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T.
    (2004) Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. InE. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp.175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L.
    (2018) Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. doi:  10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A.
    (2015) The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(26). doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I.
    (2018) Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. doi:  10.1037/xge0000395
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395 [Google Scholar]
  34. Feierabend, S., Rathgeb, T., & Reutter, T.
    (2018) JIM-Studie 2018. Jugend, Information, Medien. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D.
    (2011) Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. doi:  10.1111/j.1754‑8845.2011.01103.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01103.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A.
    (2013) What You Read Matters: The Role of Fiction Genre in Predicting Interpersonal Sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi:  10.1037/a0034084
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gorini, A., Capideville, C. S., De Leo, G., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G.
    (2011) The Role of Immersion and Narrative in Mediated Presence: The Virtual Hospital Experience. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 99–105. doi:  10.1089/cyber.2010.0100
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0100 [Google Scholar]
  38. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  39. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F.
    (2004) Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2004.tb00317.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J.
    (2008) Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. doi:  10.1080/15213260802492000
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802492000 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., Böcking, S., Ravaja, N., Laarni, J., Saari, T., Gouveia, F., & Maria Sacau, A.
    (2016) The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES): A Short Self-Report Measure for Diverse Media Settings. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1), 1–15. doi:  10.1027/1864‑1105/a000137
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hayes, A. F.
    (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second edition). The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hayles, N. K.
    (2008) Electronic literature: New Horizons for the Literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J.
    (2018) Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0204494. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0204494
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jenkins, H.
    (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E.
    (2015) Spoiler Alert: Consequences of Narrative Spoilers for Dimensions of Enjoyment, Appreciation, and Transportation. Communication Research, 42(8), 1068–1088. doi:  10.1177/0093650214564051
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214564051 [Google Scholar]
  47. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Johnsson-Smaragdi, U., & Jönsson, A.
    (2006) Book Reading in Leisure Time: Long-Term changes in young peoples’ book reading habits. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 519–540. doi:  10.1080/00313830600953600
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600953600 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kidd, D., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2019) Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. doi:  10.1177/1948550618775410
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775410 [Google Scholar]
  51. Krakowiak, K. M., & Oliver, M. B.
    (2012) When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01618.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Kress, G. R.
    (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Bálint, K., Doicaru, M. M., & Tan, E. S.
    (2017) Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences. InF. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp.29–48). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.27.03kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.03kui [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M.
    (2014) Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuzmičová, A.
    (2014) Literary Narrative and Mental Imagery: A View from Embodied Cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293. doi: 10.1111/comt.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12084 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2016) Does it Matter Where You Read? Situating Narrative in Physical Environment. Communication Theory, 26(3), 290–308. doi:  10.1111/comt.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12084 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C.
    (2017) Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137–152. doi:  10.1177/0963947017704729
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704729 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J.
    (2001) A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. doi:  10.1162/105474601300343612
    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lissa, C. J. van, Caracciolo, M., Duuren, T. van, & Leuveren, B. van
    (2016) Difficult Empathy. The Effect of Narrative Perspective on Readers’ Engagement with a First-Person Narrator. Diegesis, 5(1), 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., Ijsselsteijn, W., & Schaevitz, R. J.
    (Eds.) (2015) Immersed in Media: Telepresence Theory, Measurement & Technology. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10190‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10190-3 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T.
    (1997) At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.1997.tb00072.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., & Weinstein, L.
    (2009) Measuring Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/308b/16bec9f17784fed039ddf4f86a856b36a768.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D.
    (2014) Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man [Google Scholar]
  64. Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L.
    (2019) Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 38. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J.
    (2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. doi:  10.1080/02699931.2010.515151
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  68. Marcos, D., Ngo, K., & Goberna, D.
    (2017) A-Frame (Version 0.8.0) [Computer software]. htttp://www.aframe.io
    [Google Scholar]
  69. (2018) Supermedium. htttp://www.supermedium.com
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Martignano, A. J., Herrera, F., Castano, E., & Konrath, S.
    (2019) Virtual Reality Can Increase Empathy: A preregistered Meta-Analysis. 31st Annual Convention for the Association for Psychological Science, Washington DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W.
    (2010) This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 361–368. doi:  10.1177/1948550610376600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600 [Google Scholar]
  72. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  73. Neumann, D., & Moffitt, R.
    (2018) Affective and Attentional States When Running in a Virtual Reality Environment. Sports, 6(3), 71. doi:  10.3390/sports6030071
    https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030071 [Google Scholar]
  74. Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J.
    (2012) The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. doi:  10.1177/1077699012439020
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020 [Google Scholar]
  75. Pasieka, T. [Google Scholar]
  76. Peters, S., & van Strien, S.
    (2018) Boekenbranche meting 44. 1e themameting van 2018 naar het kopen, lezen en lenen van boeken onder jongeren tussen 12 en 25 jaar. GfK.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pianzola, F. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pianzola, Federico, Weller, Jessica, & Bálint, Katalin
    (2019) Experimental data for “Virtual Reality as a Tool for Promoting Reading via Enhanced Narrative Absorption and Empathy” [Data set]. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3706937
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3706937 [Google Scholar]
  79. Potthoff, R. F.
    (1964) On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29(3), 241–256. doi:  10.1007/BF02289721
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289721 [Google Scholar]
  80. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I.
    (2020) A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 [Google Scholar]
  81. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M.
    (2007) Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45–56. doi:  10.1089/cpb.2006.9993
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 [Google Scholar]
  82. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A.
    (2015) Intention, Action, Self and Other: An Evolutionary Model of Presence. InM. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. IJsselsteijn, & R. J. Schaevitz (Eds.), Immersed in Media (pp.73–99). Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10190‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10190-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  83. Rooney, B., Burke, C., Balint, K., O’Leary, T., Parsons, T., Lee, C. T., & Mantei, C.
    (2017) Virtual reality, presence and social cognition: The effect of eye-gaze and narrativity on character engagement. 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), 1–6. doi:  10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346272
    https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346272 [Google Scholar]
  84. Ryan, M.-L.
    (2015) Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media (Second edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Schmidt, S., Ehrenbrink, P., Weiss, B., Voigt-Antons, J.-N., Kojic, T., Johnston, A., & Moller, S.
    (2018) Impact of Virtual Environments on Motivation and Engagement During Exergames. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 1–6. doi:  10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463389
    https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463389 [Google Scholar]
  86. Schutte, N. S., & Stilinović, E. J.
    (2017) Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 708–712. doi:  10.1007/s11031‑017‑9641‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9641-7 [Google Scholar]
  87. Shen, L.
    (2010) On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504–524. doi:  10.1080/10570314.2010.512278
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512278 [Google Scholar]
  88. Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., F. P., & Whitton, M. C.
    (2017) A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1–39. doi:  10.1145/3134301
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301 [Google Scholar]
  89. Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M.
    (2009) Reading Stories Activates Neural Representations of Visual and Motor Experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02397.x [Google Scholar]
  90. Sukalla, F., Bilandzic, H., Bolls, P. D., & Busselle, R.
    (2016) Embodiment of Narrative Engagement: Connecting Self-Reported Narrative Engagement to Psychophysiological Measures. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 175–186. doi:  10.1027/1864‑1105/a000153
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000153 [Google Scholar]
  91. Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J.
    (2010) Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  92. Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A.
    (2014) How to Measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 328–341. doi:  10.1111/spc3.12110
    https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12110 [Google Scholar]
  93. van Loon, A., Bailenson, J., Zaki, J., Bostick, J., & Willer, R.
    (2018) Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0202442. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0202442
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202442 [Google Scholar]
  94. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
    (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:  10.1287/mnsc.
    https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc. [Google Scholar]
  95. Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, L., Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Ravaja, N., Sacau, A., Baumgartner, T., & Jäncke, P.
    (2004) MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC- SPQ): Short Documentation and Instructions for Application (p.14). Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661). www.ijk.hmt-hannover.de/presence
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Wales, N.
    (2016) The Raven. Space Pen Studios. https://www.oculus.com/experiences/go/974760535972181/
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wei, W., Qi, R., & Zhang, L.
    (2019) Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management, 71, 282–293. doi:  10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024 [Google Scholar]
  98. Wennekers, A., Haan, J. de, & Huysmans, F.
    (2016) Media: Tijd in kaart. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Whalen, Z. N.
    (2008) The videogame text: Typography and textuality [University of Florida]. etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0022526/whalen_z.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J.
    (1998) Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240. doi:  10.1162/105474698565686
    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686 [Google Scholar]
  101. Yu, C.-L., & Chou, T.-L.
    (2018) A Dual Route Model of Empathy: A Neurobiological Prospective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 2012 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02212
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02212 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): empathy; fiction; narrative absorption; reading; transportation; virtual reality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error