1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Many studies have claimed to find that reading fiction leads to improvements in social cognition. But this work has left open the critical question of whether any type of narrative, fictional or nonfictional, might have similar effects. To address this question, as well as to test whether framing a narrative as fiction matters, the current studies presented participants ( = 268 in Study 1;  = 362 in Study 2) with literary fiction texts, narrative nonfiction texts, expository nonfiction texts, or no texts. We tested their theory-of-mind abilities using the picture-based Reading the Mind in the Eyes task and a text-based test of higher-order social cognition. Reading anything was associated with higher scores compared to reading nothing, but the effects of framing and text type were inconsistent. These results suggest that prior claims regarding positive effects of reading fiction on mentalizing should be seen as tenuous; other mechanisms may be driving previously published effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20007.chl
2021-03-19
2025-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altmann, U. , Bohrn, I. C. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Fact vs fiction – How paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. doi:  10.1093/scan/nss098
    https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098 [Google Scholar]
  2. Appel, M. , Gnambs, T. , Richter, T. , & Green, M. C.
    (2015) The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. doi:  10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.987400 [Google Scholar]
  3. Argo, J. J. , Zhu, R. , & Dahl, D. W.
    (2008) Fact or fiction: An investigation of empathy differences in response to emotional melodramatic entertainment. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 614–623. doi:  10.1086/521907
    https://doi.org/10.1086/521907 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bal, P. M. , & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e55341. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. , Wheelwright, S. J. , Hill, J. , Raste, Y. , & Plumb, I.
    (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. doi:  10.1111/1469‑7610.00715
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715 [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, J. B. , Turner, T. J. , & Bower, G. H.
    (1979) Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(2), 187–198. doi:  10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90118‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90118-X [Google Scholar]
  7. Black, J. , & Barnes, J. L.
    (2015) Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 423–429. doi:  10.1037/aca0000031
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000031 [Google Scholar]
  8. Camerer, C. F. , Dreber, A. , Holzmeister, F. , Ho, T.-H. , Huber, J. , Johannesson, M. , … Wu, H.
    (2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour. doi:  10.1038/s41562‑018‑0399‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z [Google Scholar]
  9. Converse, B. A. , Lin, S. , Keysar, B. , & Epley, N.
    (2008) In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 8, 725–730. doi:  10.1037/a0013283
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013283 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coplan, A.
    (2004) Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62, 141–152. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑594X.2004.00147.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.x [Google Scholar]
  11. (2006) Caring about characters: Three determinants of emotional engagement. Film and Philosophy, 10, 1–19. 10.5840/filmphil2006102
    https://doi.org/10.5840/filmphil2006102 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Mulder, H. N. M. , Hakemulder, F. , van den Berghe, R. , Klaassen, F. , & van Berkum, J. J. A.
    (2017) Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 129–169. doi:  10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem [Google Scholar]
  13. Djikic, M. , & Oatley, K.
    (2014) The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498–505. doi:  10.1037/a0037999
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037999 [Google Scholar]
  14. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. , & Carland, M.
    (2012) Genre or artistic merit?: The effect of literature on personality. Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 25–36. doi:  10.1075/ssol.2.1.02dji
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.02dji [Google Scholar]
  15. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. , & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3, 28–47. doi:  10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  16. Dodell-Feder, D. , & Tamir, D. I.
    (2018) Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. doi:  10.1037/xge0000395
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395 [Google Scholar]
  17. Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. , Owen, P. D. , & Coté, N. C.
    (1990) Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(5), 566–581. doi:  10.1016/0749‑596X(90)90052‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90052-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fong, K. , Mullin, J. B. , & Mar, R. A.
    (2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi:  10.1037/a0034084
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gabriel, S. , & Young, A. F.
    (2011) Becoming a vampire without being bitten: The narrative collective-assimilation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 22, 990–994. doi:  10.1177/0956797611415541
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611415541 [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldstein, T. R.
    (2009) The pleasure of unadulterated sadness: Experiencing sorrow in fiction, nonfiction, and “in person.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(4), 232–237. doi:  10.1037/a0015343
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015343 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldstein, T. R. , & Winner, E.
    (2012) Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(1), 19–37. doi:  10.1080/15248372.2011.573514
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.573514 [Google Scholar]
  22. Green, M. C. , Chatham, C. , & Sestir, M. A.
    (2012) Emotion and transportation into fact and fiction. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 37–59. doi:  10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre [Google Scholar]
  23. Green, M. C. , Garst, J. , Brock, T. C. , & Chung, S.
    (2006) Fact versus fiction labeling: Persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychology, 8, 267–285. doi:  10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Greene, J. P. , Hitt, C. , Kraybill, A. , & Bogulski, C. A.
    (2015) Learning from live theater: Students realize gains in knowledge, tolerance, and more. Education Next, 15(1), 55–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hendersen, D. J. O. , & Clark, H. H.
    (2007) Retelling narratives as fiction or nonfiction. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp.353–358).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 150–155. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Keen, S.
    (2007) Empathy and the novel. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2019) Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. doi:  10.1177/1948550618775410
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775410 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kidd, D. C. , Ongis, M. , & Castano, E.
    (2016) On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 42–58. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid [Google Scholar]
  31. Kinderman, P. , Dunbar, R. , & Bentall, R. P.
    (1998) Theory-of-mind deficits and causal attributions. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 191–204. doi:  10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1998.tb02680.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02680.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Koopman, E. M. E.
    (2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 82–98. doi:  10.1037/aca0000041
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mar, R. A.
    (2011) The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103–134. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑psych‑120709‑145406
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2018) Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. doi:  10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mar, R. A. , & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , Hirsh, J. , dela Paz, J. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mar, R. A. , Tackett, J. L. , & Moore, C.
    (2010) Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 25, 69–78. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mumper, M. L. , & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  40. Murphy, S. T.
    (1998) The impact of factual versus fictional media portrayals on cultural stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560, 165–178. Retrieved fromwww.jstor.org/stable/1048984
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nussbaum, M.
    (2003) Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Oatley, K.
    (1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117. doi:  10.1037/1089‑2680.3.2.101
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2012) The cognitive science of fiction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 425–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Panero, M. E. , Weisberg, D. S. , Black, J. , Goldstein, T. R. , Barnes, J. L. , Brownell, H. , & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000064
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2017) No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano’s Commentary on Panero et al. (2016). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), e5–e8. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000079
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000079 [Google Scholar]
  46. Peterson, E. , & Miller, S. F.
    (2012) The eyes test as a measure of individual differences: How much of the variance reflects verbal IQ?Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 220. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00220
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00220 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pino, M. C. , & Mazza, M.
    (2016) The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLOS ONE, 11(8), e0160254. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0160254
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254 [Google Scholar]
  48. Samur, D. , Tops, M. , & Koole, S. L.
    (2018) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 130–144. doi:  10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. , & Aharon-Peretz, J.
    (2007) Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3054–3067. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  50. Stanovich, K. E. , & West, R. F.
    (1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. 10.2307/747605
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747605 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tager-Flusberg, H. , & Sullivan, K.
    (2000) A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 76(1), 59–90. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(00)00069‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00069-X [Google Scholar]
  52. Vezzali, L. , Stathi, S. , & Giovannini, D.
    (2012) Indirect contact through book reading: Improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants. Psychology in the Schools, 49(2), 148–162. doi:  10.1002/pits.20621
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20621 [Google Scholar]
  53. Vezzali, L. , Stathi, S. , Giovannini, D. , Capozza, D. , & Trifiletti, E.
    (2015) The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105–121. doi:  10.1111/jasp.12279
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12279 [Google Scholar]
  54. Weisberg, D. S. , Hirsh-Pasek, K. , Golinkoff, R. M. , & McCandliss, B. D.
    (2014) Mise en place: Setting the stage for thought and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 276–278. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zunshine, L.
    (2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zwaan, R. A.
    (1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.20.4.920
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20007.chl
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20007.chl
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): empathy; fiction; framing; narrative; reading; theory of mind
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error