1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Digital reading has established its position, and thus research on how reading mode affects reading experience and enjoyment is needed. This study is based on a reading experiment with 89 14–15-year-olds who read or listened to an entire book in four different reading modes: paperbook, ebook, audiobook, and via a commercial subscription service. Using quantitative methods, we examine whether reading mode affects story world absorption as well as seek connections between gender, motivation, absorption and reading mode preferences. Based on the study, reading mode has no statistical impact on narrative absorption experience, measured by the Story World Absorption Scale. Instead, the experience correlates with reading motivation; an adolescent with higher motivation is more likely to feel absorbed while reading, regardless of reading mode. On average, girls experience higher reading motivation and absorption than boys. Less motivated seem to prefer audiobook whereas more motivated choose reading over listening.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
2021-12-17
2023-05-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aaltonen, L.-S.
    (2019) ”Miks mä lukisin kirjaa?” Digitaalinen lukeminen nuoren lukumotivaation herättäjänä. Nuorisotutkimus, 37(3/4), 69–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. (2020) Lukuklaani-tutkimus. Ala- ja yläkoulujen alkukartoitusten koosteet, analyysi ja tiedottaminen. Tutkimusraportti 2017–2019 https://blogs.helsinki.fi/lukuklaani/files/2020/01/Lukuklaani-tutkimusraportti-2017%E2%80%932019-1.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M.
    (2011) Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32. doi:  10.1037/a0022086
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086 [Google Scholar]
  4. Afflerbach, P., & Harrison, C.
    (2017) What Is Engagement, How Is It Different From Motivation, and How Can I Promote It?Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 217–220. doi:  10.1002/jaal.679
     https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.679 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E.
    (2011) Adolescents as Readers. InM. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, volume IV (pp.157–176). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexander, J., & Jarman, R.
    (2018) The pleasures of reading non-fiction. Literacy, 52(2), 78–85. doi:  10.1111/lit.12152
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12152 [Google Scholar]
  7. Appleyard, J. A. k.
    (1990) Becoming a reader: The experience of fiction from childhood to adulthood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baron, N. S.
    (2013) Redefining reading: The impact of digital communication media. PMLA, 128(1), 193–200. doi:  10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.193
     https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2015) Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R.
    (2008) Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2008.00397.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Brozo, W. G., Sulkunen, S., Shiel, G., Garbe, C., Pandian, A., & Valtin, R.
    (2014) Reading, Gender, and Engagement: LESSONS FROM FIVE PISA COUNTRIES. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(7), 584–593. doi:  10.1002/jaal.291
     https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.291 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burnett, C., & Merchant, G.
    (2018) Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69. doi:  10.1111/lit.12144
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12144 [Google Scholar]
  13. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
    (2008) Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2008.00322.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x [Google Scholar]
  14. (2009) Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. doi:  10.1080/15213260903287259
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheema, J. R.
    (2018) Adolescents’ enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: New evidence from a cross-country survey. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(S1), S149–S162. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9817.12257
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12257 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark, C., Osborne, S., & Garland, R.
    (2008) Young People’s Self-Perceptions as Readers: An Investigation Including Family, Peer and School Influences. National Literacy Trust.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Clinton, V.
    (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9817.12269
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269 [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins, J.
    (2013) Reading, in a digital archive of one’s own.(Critical essay). PMLA, 128(1), 207–212. doi:  10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.207
     https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.207 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cremin, T., & Moss, G.
    (2018) Reading for pleasure: supporting reader engagement. Literacy, 52, 59–61. doi:  10.1111/lit.12156
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12156 [Google Scholar]
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, M.
    (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L.
    (2013) Love That Book: Multimodal Response to Literature. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 220–226. 10.1002/TRTR.1206
     https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1206 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davidovitch, N., Yavich, R., & Druckman, E.
    (2016) Don’t Throw out Paper and Pens Yet: On the Reading Habits of Students. Journal of international education research, 12(4), 129–144. doi:  10.19030/jier.v12i4.9799
     https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v12i4.9799 [Google Scholar]
  23. Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L.
    (2018) Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. doi:  10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R.
    (2007) Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2007.00509.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C.
    (1983) Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. InJ. T. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp.75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldman, S. R.
    (2012) Adolescent Literacy: Learning and Understanding Content. The Future of Children, 22(2), 89–116. doi:  10.1353/foc.2012.0011
     https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2012.0011 [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  28. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F.
    (2004) Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2004.tb00317.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Guthrie, J., & Klauda, S.
    (2016) Engagement and Motivational Processes in Reading. InP. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: reader, text, and context (pp.41–53). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E.
    (1999) Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256. doi:  10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hakemulder, J., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Bálint, K., & Doicaru, M. M.
    (2017) Narrative absorption. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lal.27
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hedemark, Å
    (2012) A Study of Swedish Children’s Attitudes to Reading and Public Library Activities. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 18(2), 116–127. doi:  10.1080/13614541.2012.716693
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2012.716693 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, T., & Brown, C.
    (2011) Reading Engagement: A Comparison between E-Books and Traditional Print Books in an Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F.
    (1984) Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 911–924. doi:  10.1037/0012‑1649.20.5.911
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.5.911 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kajander, A.
    (2020) Kirja ja lukija digitalisoituvassa arjessa. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Helda. urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-5839-0. 10.37449/ennenjanyt.90686
     https://doi.org/10.37449/ennenjanyt.90686
  36. Keller, J., & Bless, H.
    (2008) Flow and Regulatory Compatibility: An Experimental Approach to the Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 196–209. doi:  10.1177/0146167207310026
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310026 [Google Scholar]
  37. Koepnick, L.
    (2013) Reading on the move. PMLA, 128(1), 232–237. doi:  10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.232
     https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.232 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Cremin, T.
    (2017) Young children’s reading for pleasure with digital books: Six key facets of engagement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 67–84. doi:  10.1080/0305764X.2015.1118441
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1118441 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuijpers, M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D.
    (2019) Personality Traits and Reading Habits That Predict Absorbed Narrative Fiction Reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 74–88. doi:  10.1037/aca0000168
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000168 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M.
    (2014) Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakka, L.
    (in press). Lukutaito ja osallisuus – onko toista ilman toista?InJ. Paananen, M. Luodonpää-Manni, M. Lindeman, & C. Lindholm Eds. Kieli, hyvinvointi ja sosiaalinen osallisuus. Helsinki: Vastapaino.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Larson, L.
    (2015) E-books and Audiobooks. Reading Teacher, 69(2), 169–177. 10.1002/trtr.1371
     https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1371 [Google Scholar]
  43. Leino, K., Ahonen, A. K., Hienonen, N., Hiltunen, J., Lintuvuori, M., Lähteinen, S., Lämsä, J., Nissinen, K., Nissinen, V., Puhakka, E., Pulkkinen, J., Rautopuro, J., Siren, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Vettenranta, J.
    (2019) PISA 2018 ensituloksia – Suomi parhaiden joukossa. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2019:40.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D.
    (2004) Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. InR. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp.1570–1613). Newark: International Reading Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Linnakylä, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K.
    (2004) Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 231–249. doi:  10.1080/00313830410001695718
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830410001695718 [Google Scholar]
  46. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Vincent, J., Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K.
    (2014) Net children go mobile: The UK report. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Malloy, J. A., Marinak, B. A., Gambrell, L. B., & Mazzoni, S. A.
    (2013) Assessing Motivation to Read. Reading Teacher, 67(4), 273–282. doi:  10.1002/trtr.1215
     https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1215 [Google Scholar]
  48. Malloy, J. A., Parsons, A. W., Marinak, B. A., Applegate, A. J., Applegate, M. D., Ray Reutzel, D., & Gambrell, L. B.
    (2017) Assessing (and Addressing!) Motivation to Read Fiction and Nonfiction. Reading Teacher, 71(3), 309–325. doi:  10.1002/trtr.1633
     https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1633 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D.
    (2014) Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. doi:  10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man [Google Scholar]
  50. Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.
    (2019) Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?Frontiers in psychology, 10(38), 1–11. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mangen, A., & Weel, A.
    (2016) The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50(3), 116–124. doi:  10.1111/lit.12086
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12086 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K.
    (2013) Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(C), 61–68. doi:  10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  53. Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L.
    (2013) E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 512–519. doi:  10.1002/acp.2930
     https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2930 [Google Scholar]
  54. Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B.
    (2008) Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards: What Sustains Young Children’s Engagement with Text?Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(1), 9–26. doi:  10.1080/19388070701749546
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070701749546 [Google Scholar]
  55. Merga, M. K.
    (2014a) Are Teenagers “Really” Keen Digital Readers? Adolescent Engagement in Ebook Reading and the Relevance of Paper Books Today. English in Australia, 49(1), 27–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. (2014b) Peer Group and Friend Influences on the Social Acceptability of Adolescent Book Reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 472–482. doi:  10.1002/jaal.273
     https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.273 [Google Scholar]
  57. Merga, M. K., & Saiyidi, M. R.
    (2018) Parents as Social Influences Encouraging Book Reading: Research Directions for Librarians’ Literacy Advocacy. Journal of Library Administration, 58(7), 674–697. doi:  10.1080/01930826.2018.1514841
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1514841 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nell, V.
    (1988) Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New York: Yale University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1ww3vk3
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3vk3 [Google Scholar]
  59. OECD
    OECD (2019) PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. 10.1787/b5fd1b8f‑en
     https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en [Google Scholar]
  60. Parsons, A. W., Parsons, S. A., Malloy, J. A., Gambrell, L. B., Marinak, B. A., Reutzel, D. R., & Fawson, P. C.
    (2018) Upper Elementary Students’ Motivation to Read Fiction and Nonfiction. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 505–523. doi:  10.1086/696022
     https://doi.org/10.1086/696022 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., Delaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., & Dunston, P. J.
    (2007) Assessing Adolescents’ Motivation to Read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 378–396. doi:  10.1598/JAAL.50.5.5
     https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.5.5 [Google Scholar]
  62. Prensky, M.
    (2001a) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi:  10.1108/10748120110424816
     https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2001b) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. doi:  10.1108/10748120110424843
     https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2013) Our Brains Extended. Educational leadership, 70(6), 22–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rideout, V.
    (2016) Measuring time spent with media: The Common Sense census of media use by US 8- to 18-year-olds. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 138–144. doi:  10.1080/17482798.2016.1129808
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1129808 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ruddel, R., & Unrau, N.
    (2013) Reading as a Motivated Meaning-Construction Process: The Reader, the Text, and the Teacher. InD. Alvermann, R. Ruddel, & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 6th edition (pp.1015–1068). Newark: International Reading Association. 10.1598/0710.38
     https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.38 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rutherford, L., Merga, M. K., & Singleton, A.
    (2018a) Influences on Australian adolescents’ recreational reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 44–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rutherford, L., Singleton, A., Derr, L. A., & Merga, M. K.
    (2018b) Do digital devices enhance teenagers’ recreational reading engagement? Issues for library policy from a recent study in two Australian states. Public Library Quarterly, 37(3), 318–340. doi:  10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214 [Google Scholar]
  69. Simukka, S.
    (2013a) Punainen kuin veri. Helsinki: Tammi.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. (2013b) Punainen kuin veri (ebook, ePub 2). Helsinki: Tammi.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. (2014) Punainen kuin veri (audiobook). Helsinki: Tammi.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A.
    (2017a) Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. doi:  10.3102/0034654317722961
     https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2017b) Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. doi:  10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794 [Google Scholar]
  74. Støle, H., Mangen, A., & Schwippert, K.
    (2020) Assessing children’s reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode-effect study. Computers & Education, 151. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J.
    (2013) Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits. New Library World, 114(7/8), 284–300. doi:  10.1108/NLW‑01‑2013‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-01-2013-0012 [Google Scholar]
  76. Strommen, L. T., & Mates, B. F.
    (2004) Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens: students in sixth and ninth grades were surveyed to determine attitudes toward reading and identify factors associated with the development of a love of reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188–200. doi:  10.1598/JAAL.48.3.1
     https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.3.1 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sulkunen, S.
    (2013) Adolescent Literacy in Europe – An Urgent Call for Action. European Journal of Education, 48(4), 528–542. doi:  10.1111/ejed.12052
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12052 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sulkunen, S., Välijärvi, J., Arffman, I., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Kupari, P., Nissinen, K., Puhakka, E., & Reinikainen, P.
    (2010) Pisa 2009. Ensituloksia. Helsinki: Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2010:21.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sullivan, A., & Brown, M.
    (2015) Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 971–991. doi:  10.1002/berj.3180
     https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3180 [Google Scholar]
  80. Tainio, L., Grünthal, S., Routarinne, S., Satokangas, H., & Hiidenmaa, P.
    (2019) Primary school pupils’ literary landscapes: What do Finnish- and Swedish-speaking pupils read at school?InH. Höglund, S. Jusslin, M. Ståhl, & A. Westerlund (Eds.), Genom texter och världar (pp.217–233). Åbo Akademi University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Tainio, L., Aaltonen, L., & Leksis, S.
    (2021) Harry Potter vai Anna Liisa? Sukupuoli ja opettajien lukusuositukset perusopetuksen äidinkieli ja kirjallisuus -oppiaineessa. InJ. Hanska, E. Luukka, A. Palomäki, & L. Pihkala-Posti (Eds.), Ainedidaktiikan ytimessä: Mitä, miksi ja miten opetan?Suomen ainedidaktisen seuran julkaisuja 19.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Tamborini, R., Bowman, N., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A.
    (2010) Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2010.01513.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x [Google Scholar]
  83. Thissen, B. A. K., Menninghaus, W., & Schlotz, W.
    (2018) Measuring Optimal Reading Experiences: The Reading Flow Short Scale.(Report). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–12. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02542
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02542 [Google Scholar]
  84. Tveit, Å. K., & Mangen, A.
    (2014) A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library and Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179–184. doi:  10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  85. Vettenranta, J., Välijärvi, J., Ahonen, A., Hautamäki, J., Hiltunen, J., Leino, K., Lähteinen, S., Nissinen, K., Nissinen, V., Puhakka, E., Rautopuro, J., & Vainikainen, M.-P.
    (2016) PISA 15. Ensituloksia. Huipulla pudotuksesta huolimatta. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2016(41).
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.
    (2002) The Development of Competence Beliefs, Expectancies for Success, and Achievement Values from Childhood through Adolescence. InA. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.9–119). San Diego: Elsevier Science & Technology. 10.1016/B978‑012750053‑9/50006‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1 [Google Scholar]
  87. Zwaan, R. A.
    (1993) Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamin. 10.1075/upal.29
     https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.29 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
Loading
Absorbing narratives and Motivation to Read
Scientific Study of Literature 11, 74 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20009.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adolescents; audiobook; ebook; media effects; narrative absorption; reading motivation

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error