1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Reading fiction has been associated with improved social and imaginative reasoning that could lead to improved critical thinking. This observational study investigated the relationship between fiction and nonfiction exposure, narrative transportation, and factors of critical thinking (critical thinking disposition, and epistemological orientation). Self-selecting participants ( = 335) completed an online survey including an author recognition test and self-report scales. Fiction scores were significantly associated with higher critical thinking disposition, while nonfiction had an inverse effect correlating with lower disposition. Fiction reading was associated with decreased absolutism, and nonfiction score conversely with higher absolutism. Total and nonfiction print exposure were associated with lower multiplism, with no significant association for fiction. Total and fiction print exposure were associated with higher evaluativism, with no significant association for nonfiction. Narrative transportation mediated some of these relationships. These findings provide a basis for further research into reading fiction and nonfiction, and critical thinking.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20014.hol
2021-12-17
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D.
    (2008) Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. doi:  10.3102/0034654308326084
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aloqaili, A. S.
    (2012) The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35–41. doi:  10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Appel, M., & Richter, T.
    (2007) Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–134. doi: 10.1080/15213260701301194
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701301194 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arslan, S., & Demirtas, Z.
    (2016) Social emotional learning and critical thinking disposition. Studia Psychologica, 58(4), 276–285. doi:  10.21909/sp.2016.04.723
    https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2016.04.723 [Google Scholar]
  5. Avin, S.
    (2019) Exploring artificial intelligence futures. Journal of AI Humanities, 2, 171–193. doi:  10.17863/CAM.35812
    https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35812 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bal, M. P., & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  7. Batchelor, O.
    (2017) Getting out the truth: The role of libraries in the fight against fake news. Reference Services Review, 45(2), 143–148. doi:  10.1108/RSR‑03‑2017‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2017-0006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Black, J. E., Capps, S. C., & Barnes, J. L.
    (2017) Fiction, genre exposure, and moral reality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi:  10.1037/aca0000116
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000116 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., & Arnau, J.
    (2017) Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?Psicothema, 29.4, 552–557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383
    https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloom, P.
    (2016) Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
    (2008) Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A Model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2008.00322.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Byrne, R. M. J.
    (2016) Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 135–157. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122414‑033249
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249 [Google Scholar]
  13. Byrnes, J. P., & Dunbar, K. N.
    (2014) The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 477–493. doi:  10.1007/s10648‑014‑9284‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E.
    (1984) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. InT. E. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol.11, pp.673–675). Association for Consumer Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chan, C.
    (2019) Using digital storytelling to facilitate critical thinking disposition in youth civic engagement: A randomized control trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104522. doi:  10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104522
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104522 [Google Scholar]
  16. Colucciello, M. L.
    (1997) Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students – A conceptual model for evaluation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13(4), 236–245. doi:  10.1016/S8755‑7223(97)80094‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80094-4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Corballis, M. C.
    (2009) Mental time travel and the shaping of language. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 553–560. doi:  10.1007/s00221‑008‑1491‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1491-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J.
    (2014) Empathy: A Review of the Concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. doi:  10.1177/1754073914558466
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T.
    (2004) Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. InE. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion. (pp.175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, M. H.
    (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.44.1.113
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 [Google Scholar]
  21. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L.
    (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. doi:  10.1177/1534582304267187
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 [Google Scholar]
  22. DioGuardi, S.
    (2016) Critical thinking in criminal justice ethics: Using the affective domain to discover gray matters. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 535–548. doi:  10.1080/10511253.2016.1145709
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1145709 [Google Scholar]
  23. Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Opening the closed mind: The effect of exposure to literature on the need for closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 149–154. doi:  10.1080/10400419.2013.783735
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.783735 [Google Scholar]
  24. Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Defenseless against art? Impact of reading fiction on emotion in avoidantly attached individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 14–17. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dugdale, J.
    (2019, December31). Bestselling books of 2019. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/dec/31/bestselling-books-2019
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dumitru, D.
    (2019) Creating meaning: The importance of arts, humanities and culture for critical thinking development. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 870–879. doi:  10.1080/03075079.2019.1586345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586345 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ekinci, Ö., & Aybek, B.
    (2010) Analysis of the empathy and the critical thinking disposition of the teacher candidates. Ilkogretim Online, 9(2), 816–816.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Elvik, S.
    (2018) The orbits of Seveneves: A book review with a touch of orbital dynamics. Principium, 20(February), 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ennis, R. H. [Google Scholar]
  30. Escalas, J. E.
    (2004) Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48. doi:  10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163 [Google Scholar]
  31. Facione, P. A.
    (1990) Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A.
    (2015) How exposure to literary genres relates to attitudes toward gender roles and sexual behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 274–285. doi:  10.1037/a0038864
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038864 [Google Scholar]
  33. Friend, S.
    (2008) Imagining fact and fiction. InK. Stock & K. Thomson-Jones (Eds.), New waves in aesthetics (pp.150–169). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230227453_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227453_8 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gerrig, R. J.
    (1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1dr37cb
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1dr37cb [Google Scholar]
  35. Greco, J.
    (2000) Two kinds of intellectual virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(1), 179–184. doi:  10.2307/2653438
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2653438 [Google Scholar]
  36. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
    (2013) In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. InM. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp.287–313). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hakemulder, J.
    (2001) How to make alle menschen bruder: Literature in a multicultural and multiform society. InG. Steen, D. H. Schram, & E. Ibsch (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp.225–242). John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.35.14hak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35.14hak [Google Scholar]
  38. (2008) Imagining what could happen: Effects of taking on the role of a character on social cognition. InS. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: In honor of Willie van Peer (pp.139–153). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.5.13hak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.5.13hak [Google Scholar]
  39. Hamby, A., Brinberg, D., & Daniloski, K.
    (2017) Reflecting on the journey: Mechanisms in narrative persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 11–22. doi:  10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hampson Lundh, A., Dolatkhah, M., & Limberg, L.
    (2018) From informational reading to information literacy. Journal of Documentation, 74(5), 1042–1052. doi:  10.1108/JD‑11‑2017‑0156
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2017-0156 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hawkins, K.
    (2012) Thinking and reading among college undergraduates: An examination of the relationship between critical thinking skills and voluntary reading [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee]. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1302
  42. Heyne, E.
    (1987) Toward a theory of literary nonfiction. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 33(3), 479–490. doi:  10.1353/mfs.0.1150
    https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.0.1150 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoeken, H., & Fikkers, K. M.
    (2014) Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Poetics, 44, 84–99. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R.
    (1997) The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. doi:  10.3102/00346543067001088
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088 [Google Scholar]
  45. Holma, K.
    (2015) The critical spirit: Emotional and moral dimensions of critical thinking. Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi, 4(1), 17–28. doi:  10.7146/spf.v4i1.18280
    https://doi.org/10.7146/spf.v4i1.18280 [Google Scholar]
  46. hooks, b.
    (1994) Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hyytinen, H., Holma, K., Toom, A., Shavelson, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S.
    (2014) The complex relationship between students’ critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in the context of problem solving. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5), 1–25. doi:  10.14786/flr.v2i4.124
    https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.124 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jeong, H. S.
    (2015) Critical thinking disposition, problem solving process, and empathy among nursing students. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 103, 44–48. doi:  10.14257/astl.2015.103.10
    https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.103.10 [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  51. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S.
    (2004) Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18. doi:  10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2 [Google Scholar]
  52. Koek, M., Janssen, T., Hakemulder, F., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
    (2016) Literary reading and critical thinking: Measuring students’ critical literary understanding in secondary education. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 243–277. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuhn, D.
    (1991) The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2019) Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. doi:  10.1159/000500171
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M.
    (2000) The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. doi:  10.1016/S0885‑2014(00)00030‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7 [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, S.-Y., Lin, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C.
    (2011) College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517. doi:  10.1002/sce.20422
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lutzke, L., Drummond, C., Slovic, P., & Árvai, J.
    (2019) Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101964. doi:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mar, R. A., & Rain, M.
    (2015) Narrative fiction and expository nonfiction differentially predict verbal ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(6), 1–15. doi:  10.1080/10888438.2015.1069296
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1069296 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mason, L., Krutka, D., & Stoddard, J.
    (2018) Media literacy, democracy, and the challenge of fake news. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(2), 1–10. doi:  10.23860/JMLE‑2018‑10‑2‑1
    https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-2-1 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W.
    (2010) This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 361–368. doi:  10.1177/1948550610376600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600 [Google Scholar]
  63. McGinnis, D.
    (2016) Epistemological orientations and evidence evaluation in undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 279–289. doi:  10.1016/j.tsc.2016.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  64. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S.
    (2017) The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e347. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X17000309
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000309 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D.
    (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X10000968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
  66. Mulnix, J. W.
    (2012) Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464–479. doi:  10.1111/j.1469‑5812.2010.00673.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  68. Oatley, K.
    (2011) Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119970910
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119970910 [Google Scholar]
  69. Özyürek, A., & Trabasso, T.
    (1997) Evaluation during the understanding of narratives. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 305–335. doi:  10.1080/01638539709544995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544995 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pardede, P.
    (2019) Using fiction to promote students’ critical thinking. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 166–178. doi:  10.33541/jet.v5i3.1309
    https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i3.1309 [Google Scholar]
  71. Paul, R.
    (1987) Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. InJ. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp.127–148). W. H. Freeman and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Pu, D., Ni, J., Song, D., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Wu, L., Wang, X., & Wang, Y.
    (2019) Influence of critical thinking disposition on the learning efficiency of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1. doi:  10.1186/s12909‑018‑1418‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1418-5 [Google Scholar]
  73. Richmond, S.
    (2004) Being in others: Empathy from a psychoanalytical perspective. European Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), 244–264. doi:  10.1111/j.0966‑8373.2004.00209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2004.00209.x [Google Scholar]
  74. Searle, J. R.
    (1975) The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. doi:  10.2307/468422
    https://doi.org/10.2307/468422 [Google Scholar]
  75. Serpell, C. N.
    (2010) Repetition and the ethics of suspended reading in American Psycho. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 51(1), 47–73. doi:  10.1080/00111610903249864
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00111610903249864 [Google Scholar]
  76. Shihab, I. A.
    (2011) Reading as critical thinking. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 209–218. doi:  10.5539/ass.v7n8p209
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n8p209 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sosu, E. M.
    (2013) The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. doi:  10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sparkles, A.
    (2019, December9). Bestselling books of 2019. Booknet Canada. https://www.booknetcanada.ca/blog/2019/12/9/2019-bestsellers
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Stansfield, J., & Bunce, L.
    (2014) The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: Separate roles for cognitive and affective components. Journal of European Psychology Students, 5, 9–18. 10.5334/jeps.ca
    https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.ca [Google Scholar]
  80. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S.
    (2008) Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513–527. doi:  10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  81. Tabačková, Z.
    (2015) Outside the classroom thinking inside the classroom walls: Enhancing students’ critical thinking through reading literary texts. The Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, 186, 726–731. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.042
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.042 [Google Scholar]
  82. Tabak, I., & Weinstock, M.
    (2008) A sociocultural exploration of epistemological beliefs. InM. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures (pp.177–195). Springer Netherlands. doi:  10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6596‑5_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_8 [Google Scholar]
  83. Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P.
    (2016) Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215–224. doi:  10.1093/scan/nsv114
    https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv114 [Google Scholar]
  84. Thayer-Bacon, B. J.
    (1992) A feminine reconceptualization of critical thinking theory. Journal of Thought, 27(1/2), 4–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. (2000) Transforming critical thinking: Thinking constructively. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K.
    (2014) mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5). doi:  10.18637/jss.v059.i05
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tsui, L.
    (2000) Effects of campus culture on students’ critical thinking. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 421–441. doi:  10.1353/rhe.2000.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0020 [Google Scholar]
  88. van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M.
    (2013) The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. doi:  10.1086/673383
    https://doi.org/10.1086/673383 [Google Scholar]
  89. Weinstock, M., Kienhues, D., Feucht, F. C., & Ryan, M.
    (2017) Informed reflexivity: Enacting epistemic virtue. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 284–298. doi:  10.1080/00461520.2017.1349662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1349662 [Google Scholar]
  90. Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S.-S.
    (2013) Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. doi:  10.1002/tea.21077
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077 [Google Scholar]
  91. Zunshine, L.
    (2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20014.hol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.20014.hol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error