1887
Volume 12, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Do narratives about suffering enhance empathy? Readers experience empathy for story characters, but does that empathy spill over into the “real” world? We investigated whether a narrative in the form of a memoir by an undocumented immigrant in the United States (compared to an expository account about undocumented immigrants) softens attitudes towards this group. Across three studies, the narrative yielded greater attitude change in the direction of empathy than did the expository reading, with this effect in some cases still visible one month later. We conclude that, compared to an expository account, a narrative about the suffering of an individual in a marginalized group renders attitudes towards members of this group more positive for those already sympathetic (Study 1) and for those initially unsympathetic (Studies 2 and 3). Study 3 demonstrated that this effect generalized to attitudes about Black Americans despite no mention of race relations in the narrative.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.21013.zen
2022-11-25
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLOS ONE. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsky, R. F.
    (2021) Clamouring for legal protection: What the great books teach us about people fleeing from persecution. UK Hart Publishing. 10.5040/9781509943180
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509943180 [Google Scholar]
  3. Currie, G. P. [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniller, A.
    (2019) American’s immigration policy priorities: Divisions between – and within – the two parties. Pew Research Center, Nov.12, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/12/americans-immigration-policy-priorities-divisions-between-and-within-the-two-parties/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis, M.
    (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 101, 85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 441, 113–126. 10.1037/0022‑3514.44.1.113
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 [Google Scholar]
  7. Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. 10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  8. Hakemulder, F.
    (2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, D. R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S.
    (2013) Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 306. 10.1037/a0033261
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033261 [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson, D. R., Huffman, B. L., & Jasper, D. M.
    (2014) Changing race boundary perception by reading narrative fiction. Basic and Applied Psychology, 361, 83–90. 10.1080/01973533.2013.856791
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856791 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufman, G., & Libby, L.
    (2012) Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. 10.1037/a0027525
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. 10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, N., Kim, H., Wojcieszak, M. K., Igartua, J-J., & Lim, M.
    (2020) The presence of the protagonist: Explaining narrative perspective effects through social presence. Media Psychology, 23: 6,891–914. 10.1080/15213269.2019.1665548
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1665548 [Google Scholar]
  15. Klein, E.
    (2021) Why we’re polarized. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Koopman, E. M.
    (2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 501, 62–79. 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Langkau, L.
    (2020) The empathic skill fiction can’t teach us. Philosophical Psychology, 33(3), 313–331, 10.1080/09515089.2020.1731446
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1731446 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lenhart, J., Dangel, J., & Richter, T.
    (2020) The relationship between lifetime book reading and empathy in adolescents: examining transportability as a moderator. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, Online First Publication, August 13, 2020. 10.1037/aca0000341
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000341 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., Dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 401, 694–712. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mar, R. A.
    (2011) The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. The Annual Review of Psychology, 621:103–34. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑120709‑145406
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2018) Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55:5–6, 454–479, 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martinez, J. E., Feldman, L. A., Feldman, M. J., & Cikara, M.
    (2021) Narratives shape cognitive representations of immigrants and immigration-policy preferences. Psychological Science, 32(2), 135–152. 10.1177/0956797620963610
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620963610 [Google Scholar]
  23. McConahay, J. B.
    (1986) Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. InJ. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp.91–125). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. 10.1037/aca0000089
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  25. Nussbaum, M.
    (1997) Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Oatley, K.
    (2016) Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5): 46–54. 10.1037/pspa0000064
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O.
    (2011) Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 351, 31, 271–280. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M.
    (2016) The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLOS ONE, 11(8), 1–14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rorty, R.
    (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804397
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397 [Google Scholar]
  31. Samur, D., Tops, M. & Koole, S. L.
    (2018) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhance mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 130–144. 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stiles, S.
    (2014) Redemption, Rorty, and Nathanael West’s Miss Lonelyhearts. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 16(2), 239–264. 10.5325/intelitestud.16.2.0239
    https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.16.2.0239 [Google Scholar]
  33. Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. M.
    (2009) Children of immigration. Harvard University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvjz82j9
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz82j9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Vargas, J. A.
    (2018) Dear America: Notes of an undocumented citizen. New York: Dey Street Books (imprint of HarperCollins).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, E., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E.
    (2015) The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105–121. 10.1111/jasp.12279
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12279 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., & Ferguson, H.
    (2021) The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition. Scientific Study of Literature, 11(2), 223–265. 10.1075/ssol.21010.wim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21010.wim [Google Scholar]
  37. Winner, E.
    (2019) How art works: A psychological exploration. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zunshine, L.
    (2012) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.21013.zen
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.21013.zen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attitude; empathy; immigrant; moral; narrative; story
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error