The implicit erasure of “literary experience” in empirical studies of literature

References

1. Bornstein, R.F
   (2011) Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: Improving psychological assessment in science and practice. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 532–544. doi: 10.1037/a0022402
   https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022402 [Google Scholar]
2. Campbell, D.T. , & Fiske, D.W
   (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 [Google Scholar]
3. Dennett, D.C
   (1991) Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hutzler, F
   (2014) Reverse inference is not a fallacy per se: Cognitive processes can be inferred from functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 84, 1061–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.075
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.075 [Google Scholar]
5. Jacobs, A
   . (in press 2016) The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kane, M.T
   (2001) Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 319–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑3984.2001.tb01130.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x [Google Scholar]
7. Kuiken, D. , & Douglas, S
   . (in press 2016) Identifying aspects of absorption that facilitate aesthetic response. In F. Hakemulder , M. Kuijpers , E. Tan , M. Doicaru , & K. Balin (Eds.), The handbook of narrative absorption. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kuiken, D. , & Miall, D.S
   (2001) Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2(1). Retrieved fromwww.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/976
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kuperberg, G.R
   (2007) Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146(5), 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 [Google Scholar]
10. Lutz, A. , & Thompson, E
    (2003) Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies10(9-10), 31–52.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pedhazur, E.J. , & Schmelkin, L.P
    (2013) Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Poldrack, R.A
    (2011) Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: From reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72(5), 692–697. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Sikora, S. , Kuiken, D. , & Miall, D.S
    (2011) Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s “The rime of the ancient mariner.”Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258–268. doi: 10.1037/a0021999
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021999 [Google Scholar]
14. Zahavi, D
    (2007) Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1-2), 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s11097‑006‑9038‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7 [Google Scholar]