1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Jacobs (2016) raises a number of insightful and provocative points about the study of literary experience, including the importance of development, the promise of process models, and the role of quantitative methods. In the present comment, we first elaborate on one aspect of the literary experience that seems to be neglected by his introductory comments, namely, that that experience is not limited to the act of reading but can easily extend to long after the reading is completed. Based on this insight, we then offer an analysis of the types of measurements that might be used in the empirical study of literary processing. While this analysis is not necessarily incompatible with Jacob’s discussion, we believe that it offers several new insights that are not readily apparent.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.03dix
2016-07-22
2018-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dixon, P. , & Bortolussi, M
    (2012) The puzzle of memory for literary text. Fictions, 11, 25–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Green, M.C. , & Brock, T.C
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacobs, A
    (2016) The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuiken, D. , Phillips, L. , Gregus, M. , Miall, D.S. , Verbitsky, M. , & Tonkonogy, A
    (2004) Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 267–286. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Postman, L. , & Senders, V.L
    (1946) Incidental learning and generality of set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 153–165. doi: 10.1037/h0061788
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061788 [Google Scholar]
  6. Reichle, E.D. , Pollatsek, A. , Fisher, D.L. , & Rayner, K
    (1998) Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.105.1.125
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125 [Google Scholar]
  7. Silverberg, L.I
    (2003) Bibliotherapy: The therapeutic use of didactic and literary texts in treatment, diagnosis, prevention, and training. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 103(3), 131–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verleger, R
    (1988) Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 343–356. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Wheeler, S.P
    (2007) So who is the little lady who started this great war. [Web page] Retrieved from: www.lincolnstudies.com/?p=338.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.03dix
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error