1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The process of reading and writing poetry is increasingly conducted by non-professionals. The current study utilized a series of regression models to explore the mechanism through which beauty judgements of non-professional poetry are made. The analysis addressed the relationships among the decision that a poem was written by a published poet (authorial attribution), a perception of the quality of the writing, the emotional response to the poem and a beauty judgement of the poem. 54 participants from two graduate applied linguistics programs rated 5 non-professional poems for their beauty, emotive response, quality of writing and semi-professional status of the writer. Analyses were conducted on averaged ratings across all five poems. The results indicate the beauty judgements, emotive response and quality of writing judgements were closely related. The decision that a poem is written by a published poet predicted the quality of writing and emotional response to the poem. An inconsistent mediation model was determined, in which increases in the semi-professional status of the writer increased the self-reported emotive response and quality of writing which in turn increased the beauty judgement of the poem. The results suggest a mechanism by which convergence of aesthetic judgement with novice reviewers is directed by the social sanctioning of the authority and quality of the writer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.04han
2016-07-22
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blythe, H. , & Sweet, C
    (2008) The writing community: A new model for the creative writing classroom. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture, 8, 305–325. doi: 10.1215/15314200‑2007‑042
    https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2007-042 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohrn, I.C. , Altmann, U. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A.M
    (2013) When we like what we know - A paramertic fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 124, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  3. Broad, B. , & Theune, M
    (2010) How we value comtemporary poetry: An empirical inquiry. College English, 73(2), 113–137. doi: 10.2307/25790465
    https://doi.org/10.2307/25790465 [Google Scholar]
  4. Donnelly, D. , & Harper, G
    (2013) Introduction: Key issues and global perspectives in creative writing. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp.xiii–xxxi). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gatti, A
    (2011) Hume’s taste for standards: Experience and aestehtic judgment reconsidered. Castelli di Yale, XI(11), 134–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanauer, D.I
    (2010) Poetry as research: Exploring second language poetry writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lal.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Healey, S
    (2013) Beyond the literary: Why creative literacy matters. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp.61–78). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leahy, A
    (2012) Undergraduate creative writing in the United States: Buying in isn’t selling out. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching creative writing (pp.73–79). Houndmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137284464_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284464_9 [Google Scholar]
  9. MacKinnon, D.P. , Fairchild, A.J. , & Fritz, M.S
    (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 583–615. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 [Google Scholar]
  10. MacKinnon, D. , Lockwood, C.M. , & Williams, J
    (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resamplin methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 99–128. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Obermeier, C. , Menninghaus, W. , von Koppenfels, M. , Raettig, T. , Schmidt-Kassow, M. , Otterbein, S. , & Kotz, S
    (2013) Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00010
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Preacher, K. , & Hayes, A.F
    (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 [Google Scholar]
  13. Reber, R. , Schwarz, N. , & Winkielman, P
    (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. van Peer, W
    (1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investiagtions of foregrounding. London, United Kingdomk: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2008) The quality of literature: Linguistic studies in literary evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lal.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4 [Google Scholar]
  16. Wandor, M
    (2012) The creative writing workshop: A survival kit. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching creative writing (pp.51–59). Houndmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137284464_7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284464_7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilbers, S
    (1999) The Iowa writer’s workshop. New York, NY: Hyperion.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.04han
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aesthetic judgments , creative writing and poetry
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error