1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The digital era has brought with it a shift in the field of literary editing in terms of the amount and kind of textual variation that can reasonably be annotated by editors. However, questions remain about how far readers engage with textual variants, especially minor ones such as small-scale changes to punctuation. In this study we present an eye-tracking experiment investigating reader sensitivity to variations in surface textual features of prose fiction. We monitored eye movements while participants read textual variants from Dickens and James, hypothesising that readers may pay more attention to lexical rather than punctuation changes. We found longer reading times for both types, but only lexical changes also increased reading times for the rest of the sentence. In addition, eye-movement behaviour and conscious ability to report changes were highly correlated. We discuss the implications for how such methods might be applied to questions of “literary” significance and textual processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.05con
2016-07-22
2018-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carminati, M. , Stabler, J. , Roberts, A. , & Fischer, M
    (2006) Readers’ responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry. Poetics, 34(3), 204–218. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Carrol, G. , & Conklin, K
    (2014) Eye-tracking multi-word units: Some methodological questions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 7(5), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Complete Works of Evelyn Waugh [Digital Library]
  4. Dickens, C
    (1846) The adventures of Oliver Twist. London, United Kingdom: Bradbury and Evans.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1867) The Charles Dickens edition. The adventures of Oliver Twist. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldman, J. , & Sellers, S
    (2010) General editors’ preface. In M. Herbert & S. Sellers (Eds.) (with research by Ian Blythe), The Cambridge edition of the works of Virginia Woolf, The Waves (pp.ix–xx). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guy, J. , Scott, R. , Conklin, K. , & Carrol, G
    (2016) Challenges in editing late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century prose fiction: What is editorial “completeness”?English Literature in Transition, 59(4), 435–455. doi: 10.1353/elt.2016.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/elt.2016.0041 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanauer, D
    (1996) Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 23(5), 363–380. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(95)00010‑H
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(95)00010-H [Google Scholar]
  9. (2001) What we know about reading poetry. Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp.107–128). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/upal.35.08han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.35.08han [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill, R. , & Murray, W
    (2000) Commas and spaces: Effects of punctuation on eye movements and sentence parsing. In A. Kennedy , R. Radach , D. Heller , & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp.565–590). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978‑008043642‑5/50027‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50027-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirotani, M. , Frazier, L. , & Rayner, K
    (2006) Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 425–443. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffstaedter, P
    (1987) Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics16(1), 75–91. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(87)90037‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(87)90037-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyona, J. , & Niemi, P
    (1990) Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. Acta Psychologica, 73, 259–280. doi: 10.1016/0001‑6918(90)90026‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90026-C [Google Scholar]
  14. Jakobson, R
    (1960) Linguistics and poetics. In T. Segbeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp.350–377). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. James, H
    (1881) The portrait of a lady. London, United Kingdom: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1908) The portrait of a lady, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Vol. III of The Novels and Tales of Henry James .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Just, M. , & Carpenter, P
    (1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295x.87.4.329
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.87.4.329 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaakinen, J. , & Hyönä, J
    (2010) Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1561–1566. doi: 10.1037/a0020693
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020693 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koops van’t Jagt, R. , Hoeks, J. , Dorleijn, G. , & Hendriks, P
    (2014) Look before you leap: How enjambment affects the processing of poetry. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1075/ssol.4.1.01jag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.01jag [Google Scholar]
  20. Landis, J. , & Koch, G
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, S. , Lee, M. , Park, H. , Chang, M.-S. , & Kwak, H.-W
    (2015) Effects of search intent on eye-movement patterns in a change detection task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(2), 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levy, B. , Di Persio, R. , & Hollingshead, A
    (1992) Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 951–91. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.18.5.957
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.957 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahlberg, M. , Conklin, K. , & Bisson, M.-J
    (2014) Reading Dickens’s characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts. Language and Literature, 23(4), 369–388. doi: 10.1177/0963947014543887
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014543887 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mar, R. , Oatley, K. , Djikic, M. , & Mullin, J
    (2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.515151
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151 [Google Scholar]
  25. McGann, J
    (1991) The textual condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McKenzie, D
    (1986) The Panizzi lectures 1985: Bibliography and the sociology of texts. London, United Kingdom: British Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Miall, D. , & Kuiken, D
    (1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422x(94)00011‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-5 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1998) The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25(6), 327–341. doi: 10.1016/s0304‑422x(98)90003‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-422x(98)90003-1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Niikuni, K. , & Muramoto, T
    (2014) Effects of punctuation on the processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences in Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 275–287. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12052
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12052 [Google Scholar]
  30. Niikuni, K. , Iwasaki, S. , & Muramoto, T
    (2015) The role of punctuation in processing relative-clause sentence Constructions in Japanese. In G. Airenti , B. Bara , G. Sandini , & M. Cruciani (Eds.), Proceedings of the meeting of the EAPCogSci (pp.692–697). Retrieved fromceur-ws.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Philips, N
    (2015) Literary neuroscience and history of mind: An interdisciplinary fMRI study of attention and Jane Austen. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies (pp.55–84). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pickering, M.J. , Frisson, S. , McElree, B. , & Traxler, M
    (2004) Eye movements and semantic composition. In M. Carreriras & C. Clifton (Eds.), On-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp.33–50). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pynte, J. , & Kennedy, A
    (2007) The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading. Vision Research, 47(9), 1215–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Raney, G
    (2003) A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 15–28. doi: 10.3758/bf03196466
    https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196466 [Google Scholar]
  35. Raney, G. , & Rayner, K
    (1995) Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 49(2), 151–172. doi: 10.1037/1196‑1961.49.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rayner, K
    (1978) Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 618–660. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.85.3.618
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618 [Google Scholar]
  37. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.124.3.372
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 [Google Scholar]
  38. Riese, K. , Bayer, M. , Lauer, G. , & Schacht, A
    (2014) In the eye of the recipient: Pupillary responses to suspense in literary classics. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 211–232. doi: 10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, A.M. , Stabler, J. , Fischer, M.H. , & Otty, L
    (2013) Space and pattern in linear and postlinear poetry: Empirical and theoretical approaches. European Journal of English Studies, 17(1), 23–40. doi: 10.1080/13825577.2012.754967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2012.754967 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanford, A. , & Filik, R
    (2007) ‘They’ as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eyetracking reveals a processing cost. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 171–178. doi: 10.1080/17470210600973390
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600973390 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schaffner, A. , Knowles, K. , Weger, U. , & Roberts, A
    (2012) Reading space in visual poetry: New cognitive perspectives. Writing Technologies, 4(1), 75–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schotter, E. , Bicknell, K , Howard, I. , Levy, R. , & Rayner, K
    (2014) Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading. Cognition, 131, 1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.018 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shillingsburg, P
    (1993) Polymorphic, polysemic, protean, reliable, electronic texts. In G. Bornstein & R. Williams (Eds.), Palimpsest: Editorial theory in the humanities (pp.29–44). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Siyanova-Chanturia, A. , Conklin, K. , & van Heuven, W.J.B
    (2011) Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. doi: 10.1037/a0022531
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022531 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stape, J
    (2013) Reply to rejoinder: The Cambridge Woolf. English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920, 56(2), 270.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Staub, A. , & Rayner, K
    (2007) Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In M.G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.327–342). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sturt, P. , Sanford, A. , Stewart, A. , & Dawydiak, E
    (2004) Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(5), 882–888. doi: 10.3758/bf03196716
    https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196716 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ward, P. , & Sturt, P
    (2007) Linguistic focus and memory: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 73–86. doi: 10.3758/bf03195944
    https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195944 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.5.2.05con
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error