1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Storytelling is a hallmark human activity. We use stories to make sense of the world, to explain it to our children, to create communities, and to learn about others. This article focuses on fictional stories and their impact on complex sociocognitive abilities. Correlational and experimental evidence shows that exposure to fiction recruits and hones our ability to represent others' mental states, or theory of mind (ToM). Experimental studies suggest this effect is specific to literary fiction. Using a unique set of texts, we replicate the finding that literary fiction improves ToM performance. Consistent with the expectation of greater focus on characters in literary fiction, linguistic analysis of the texts revealed that the literary texts contain more markers of reflective function, a sophisticated manifestation of ToM. Further analysis showed the prevalence of markers of reflective function partially mediated the effect of literary fiction on ToM performance.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
2016-12-14
2024-10-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acheson, D. J. , Wells, J. B. , & MacDonald, M. C.
    (2008) New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams R. B. Jr , Rule, N. O. , Franklin R. G. Jr , Wang, E. , Stevenson, M. T. , Yoshikawa, S. , … Ambady, N.
    (2010) Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 97–108. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21187
     https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21187 [Google Scholar]
  3. Apperly, I. A.
    (2012) What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, C. A. , Peterson, E. , Pulos, S. , & Kirkland, R. A.
    (2014) Eyes and IQ: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and “Reading the Mind in the Eyes”. Intelligence, 44, 78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. , Wheelwright, S. , Hill, J. , Raste, Y. , & Plumb, I.
    (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469‑7610.00715
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715 [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, J. E. , & Barnes, J. L.
    (2015a) The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 52, 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Black, J. , & Barnes, J. L.
    (2015b) Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 423–429. doi: 10.1037/aca0000031
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000031 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bormann, D. , & Greitemeyer, T.
    (2015) Immersed in virtual worlds and minds effects of in-game storytelling on immersion, need satisfaction, and affective theory of mind. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 646–652. doi: 10.1177/1948550615578177
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615578177 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouchard, M. A. , Target, M. , Lecours, S. , Fonagy, P. , Tremblay, L. M. , Schachter, A. , & Stein, H.
    (2008) Mentalization in adult attachment narratives: Reflective functioning, mental states, and affect elaboration compared. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(1), 47. doi: 10.1037/0736‑9735.25.1.47
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.25.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowes, A. , & Katz, A.
    (2015) Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 953–963. doi: 10.3758/s13421‑015‑0508‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0508-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brewer, M. B.
    (1988) A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer Jr. , (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol.1, pp.1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  12. Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E.
    (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.42.1.116
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, J.
    (2001) Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DeLillo, D.
    (1988) Libra. New York: Viking Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunbar, R. I.
    (2003) The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fertuck, E. A. , Mergenthaler, E. , Target, M. , Levy, K. N. , & Clarkin, J. F.
    (2012) Development and criterion validity of a computerized text analysis measure of reflective functioning. Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 298–305. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.650654
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.650654 [Google Scholar]
  17. Field, A.
    (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
  18. Fiske, S. T. , Lin, M. , & Neuberg, S. L.
    (1999) The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology (pp.231–254). New York, NY: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. E.
    (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.23, pp.1_74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  20. Fonagy, P. , & Target, M.
    (1997) Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 679–700. doi: 10.1017/S0954579497001399
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001399 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fonagy, P. , Target, M. , Steele, H. , & Steele, M.
    (1998) Reflective-functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. London, UK: University College London.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fong, K. , Mullin, J. B. , & Mar, R. A.
    (2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi: 10.1037/a0034084
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) How exposure to literary genres relates to attitudes toward gender roles and sexual behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 274–285. doi: 10.1037/a0038864
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038864 [Google Scholar]
  24. Forster, E.M.
    (2002) Aspects of the novel. New York: RosettaBooks. (Original work published 1927)
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Galinsky, A. D. , & Moskowitz, G. B.
    (2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.78.4.708
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerrig, R. J. , & Rapp, D. N.
    (2004) Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25(2), 265–281. doi: 10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑265
     https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-265 [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, M. C. , Kass, S. , Carrey, J. , Herzig, B. , Feeney, R. , & Sabini, J.
    (2008) Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. doi: 10.1080/15213260802492000
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802492000 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hakemulder, J.
    (2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/upal.34
     https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hayes, A. F.
    (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Heyes, C. M. , & Frith, C. D.
    (2014) The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091-1–1243091-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1243091
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243091 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirschfeld, L. A.
    (2001) On a folk theory of society: Children, evolution, and mental representations of social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 107–117. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoppenstand, G.
    (1998) Popular fiction: An anthology. London, UK: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Humphrey, N.
    (1984) Consciousness regained. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  34. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  35. Knox, J.
    (2003) Archetype, attachment, analysis: Jungian psychology and the emergent mind. London, UK: Brunner-Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203391525
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391525 [Google Scholar]
  36. Macrae, C. N. , & Bodenhausen, G. V.
    (2000) Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , Hirsh, J. , dela Paz, J. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworm versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with personality, ability, and achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mar, R. A. , & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. doi: 10.1515/COMM.2009.025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mascaro, J. S. , Rilling, J. K. , Negi, L. T. , & Raison, C.
    (2012) Compassion meditation enhances empathic accuracy and related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 48–55. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss095
     https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss095 [Google Scholar]
  41. Maskit, B. , & Murphy, S.
    (2014) The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP). RetrievedSeptember 01, 2014, fromwww.thereferentialprocess.org/the-discourseattributes-analysis-program-daap
  42. Mergenthaler, E. , & Bucci, W.
    (1999) Linking verbal and non-verbal representations: Computer analysis of referential activity. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72(3), 339–354. doi: 10.1348/000711299160040
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000711299160040 [Google Scholar]
  43. Miall, D. S. , & Kuiken, D.
    (1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. doi: 10.1080/01638539909545076
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545076 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell, R. , & Phillips, L.
    (2015) The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 70, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.018 [Google Scholar]
  45. Neuberg, S. L. , & Fiske, S. T.
    (1987) Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.53.3.431
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pennebaker, J.W. , Booth, R.J. , Boyd, R.L. , & Francis, M.E.
    (2015) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates (www.LIWC.net).
  47. Schurz, M. , & Perner, J.
    (2015) An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610 [Google Scholar]
  48. Singer, T.
    (2006) The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855–863. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Slade, A.
    (2005) Parental reflective functioning: An introduction. Attachment & Human Development, 7(3), 269–281. doi: 10.1080/14616730500245906
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500245906 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tamir, D. , Bricker, A. , Dodell-Feder, D. , & Mitchell, J.
    (2016) Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215–224. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114
     https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv114 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vellante, M. , Baron-Cohen, S. , Melis, M. , Marrone, M. , Petretto, D. R. , Masala, C. , & Preti, A.
    (2013) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326–354. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2012.721728
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2012.721728 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wheeler, M. E. , & Fiske, S. T.
    (2005) Controlling racial prejudice social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16(1), 56–63. doi: 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2005.00780.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00780.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiessner, P. W.
    (2014) Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14027–14035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404212111
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404212111 [Google Scholar]
  54. Young, S. G. , Hugenberg, K. , Bernstein, M. J. , & Sacco, D. F.
    (2012) Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418987
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418987 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zunshine, L.
    (2015) From the social to the literary: Approaching Cao Xueqin’sThe Story of the Stonefrom a cognitive perspective. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies (176–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
Loading
On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind
Scientific Study of Literature 6, 42 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): genre fiction; interpersonal perception; literary fiction; reflective function; text analysis; theory of mind

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error