Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This study focused on the role that empathy played in the knowledge building of 7 eighth grade readers. Participants met for twenty sessions over the course of a school year to reflect on their experiences empathizing with characters in their favorite works of literature. These reflections led to the generation of social themes. The girls worked to advance these themes by extending, contesting, and evaluating ideas presented.

In this community, the girls' attempts to empathize with characters were foundational for analyzing actions and intentions of people. Empathy was also used as a tool in their talk as the girls imagined perspectives very different from their own. This resulted in new self knowledge because hearing different perspectives led them to expand their thinking. Results suggest a role for the sociocognitive benefits of engaging in literature and developing students' capacity for empathy in Language Arts instruction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Almasi, J. F. , & Gambrell, L. B.
    (1994) Sociocognitive Conflict in Peer-Led and Teacher-Led Discussions of Literature. Reading Research Report No. 12. Retrieved fromwww.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED369069
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, R. C. , Nguyen-Jahiel, K. , McNurlen, B. , Archodidou, A. , Kim, S. , Reznitskaya, A. , … Gilbert, L.
    (2001) The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition & Instruction, 19(1), 1–46. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bal, M. P. , & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. POS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bereiter, C.
    (2002a) Design research for sustained innovation. Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2002b) Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, A.-M. , Anderson, R. C. , Kuo, L. , Kim, I.-H. , Archodidou, A. , & Nguyen-Jahiel, K.
    (2003) Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181. doi: 10.1023/A:1023429215151
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023429215151 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobb, P. , Confrey, J. , diSessa, A. , Lehrer, R. , & Schauble, L.
    (2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001009
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coplan, A.
    (2004) Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 62(2), 141–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑594X.2004.00147.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong, T. , Anderson, R. C. , Kim, I. H. , & Li, Y.
    (2008) Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 400–424. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. , & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. doi: 10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans, K. S.
    (2002) Fifth-grade students’ perceptions of how they experience literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(1), 46. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.37.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, K. S. , Anders, P. L. , & Alvermann, D. E.
    (1998) Literature discussion groups: An examination of gender roles. Reading Research & Instruction, 37, 107–122. doi: 10.1080/19388079809558258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079809558258 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivey, G. , & Johnston, P. H.
    (2013) Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1002/rrq.46
    https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.46 [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, D.R.
    (2012) Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2013) Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92. doi: 10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaufman, G. F. , & Libby, L. K.
    (2012, March 26) Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0027525
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lysaker, J. T.
    (2006) Young children’s reading of wordless picture books: What’s self got to do with it?Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6(1), 35–55. doi: 10.1177/1468798406062174
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798406062174 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lysaker, J. T. , & Miller, A.
    (2013) Engaging social imagination: The developmental work of wordless book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 147–174. doi: 10.1177/1468798411430425
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411430425 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , Hirsh, J. , dela Paz, J. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. doi: 10.1515/COMM.2009.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mercer, N. , & Littleton, K.
    (2007) Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Markus, H. , & Nurius, P.
    (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nachowitz, M.
    (2012) Reading for deep understanding: Knowledge building and conceptual artifacts in secondary English (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromState University of New York at Albany, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (Accession No. 3517110).
  24. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers
    National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical subject. Washington, DC: Authors
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Oatley, K.
    (1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117. doi: 10.1037/1089‑2680.3.2.101
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 [Google Scholar]
  26. Park, J.
    (2012) Re-imaging reader-response in middle and secondary schools: Early adolescent girls’ critical and communal reader responses to the young adult novel Speak. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(3), 191–212. doi: 10.1007/s10583‑012‑9164‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-012-9164-5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Polleck, J. N.
    (2011) Using book clubs to enhance social – emotional and academic learning with urban adolescent females of color. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(1–2), 101–128. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2011.532717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2011.532717 [Google Scholar]
  28. Reninger, K. B. , & Rehark, L.
    (2009) Discussions in a fourth-grade classroom: Using exploratory talk to promote children’s dialogic identities. Language Arts, 86(4), 268.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Reznitskaya, A. , Kuo, L.-J. , Clark, A.-M. , Miller, B. , Jadallah, M. , Anderson, R. C. , & Nguyen-Jahiel, K.
    (2009) Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48. doi: 10.1080/03057640802701952
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701952 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rosenblatt, L. M.
    (1982) The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277. doi: 10.1080/00405848209543018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848209543018 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sandoval, W.
    (2014) Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204 [Google Scholar]
  32. Scardamalia
    (2002) Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith & Henderson (Eds.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp.67–118). Chicago, IL: [Berkeley, CA.]: Open Court ; Distributed by Publishers Group West.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Scardamalia, M. , & Bereiter, C.
    (2006) Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Smit, J.
    (2015) Eighth grade girls’ knowledge building with narrative texts (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis (UMI no. 3704067).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, S., A.
    (2000) Talking about “real stuff”: Explorations of agency and romance in an all-girls’ book club. Language Arts, 78(1), 30–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Strommen, L.T. , & Mates, B.F.
    (2004) Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188–200. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.48.3.1
    https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.3.1 [Google Scholar]
  37. The Design Based Research Collective
    The Design Based Research Collective (2003) Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, J. , Scardamalia, M. , Lamon, M. , Messina, R. , & Reeve, R.
    (2007) Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145. doi: 10.1007/s11423‑006‑9019‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0 [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, J. , Scardamalia, M. , Reeve, R. , & Messina, R.
    (2009) Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7–44. doi: 10.1080/10508400802581676
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581676 [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, J. , & Sun, Y.
    (2011) Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 38(2), 147–171.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collaboration; discussion; empathy; knowledge building; literature; perspective
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error